Bassett David R, Troiano Richard P, McClain James J, Wolff Dana L
1Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN; and 2Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Apr;47(4):833-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000468.
The use of accelerometers in physical activity (PA) research has increased exponentially over the past 20 yr. The first commercially available accelerometer for assessing PA, the Caltrac, was worn on the waist and estimated PA energy expenditure in kilocalories. Around 1995, the emphasis shifted to measuring minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), especially for bouts of 10 min or longer. Recent studies, however, show that light-intensity PA and intermittent (nonbout) MVPA also have important health benefits. The total volume of PA performed is an important variable because it takes the frequency, intensity, and duration of activity bouts and condenses them down into a single metric. The total volume of PA is appropriate for many research applications and can enhance comparisons between studies. In the future, machine learning algorithms will provide improved accuracy for activity type recognition and estimation of PA energy expenditure. However, in the current landscape of objectively measured PA, total activity counts per day (TAC/d) is a proxy for the total volume of PA. TAC/d percentiles for age- and gender-specific groups have been developed from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey ActiGraph data (2003-2006), providing a novel way to assess PA. The use of TAC/d or standardized units of acceleration could harmonize PA across studies. TAC/d should be viewed as an additional metric, not intended to replace other metrics (e.g., sedentary time, light-intensity PA, moderate PA, and vigorous PA) that may also be related to health. As future refinements to wearable monitors occur, researchers should continue to consider metrics that reflect the total volume of PA in addition to existing PA metrics.
在过去20年里,加速度计在体力活动(PA)研究中的应用呈指数级增长。首款用于评估PA的商用加速度计Caltrac,需佩戴在腰部,并以千卡为单位估算PA能量消耗。大约在1995年,重点转向测量中度至剧烈PA(MVPA)的分钟数,尤其是持续10分钟或更长时间的运动。然而,最近的研究表明,轻度PA和间歇性(非连续)MVPA也具有重要的健康益处。进行的PA总量是一个重要变量,因为它综合了活动时段的频率、强度和持续时间,并将它们浓缩为一个单一指标。PA总量适用于许多研究应用,并且可以增强不同研究之间的比较。未来,机器学习算法将提高活动类型识别和PA能量消耗估算的准确性。然而,在当前客观测量PA的情况下,每天的总活动计数(TAC/d)是PA总量的一个替代指标。根据美国国家健康与营养检查调查的ActiGraph数据(2003 - 2006年),已制定了特定年龄和性别人群组的TAC/d百分位数,为评估PA提供了一种新方法。使用TAC/d或标准化加速度单位可以使不同研究中的PA测量更加统一。TAC/d应被视为一个额外的指标,并非旨在取代其他可能也与健康相关的指标(例如久坐时间、轻度PA、中度PA和剧烈PA)。随着可穿戴监测器未来的改进,研究人员除了现有的PA指标外,还应继续考虑反映PA总量的指标。