Zhen Chen, Xia Zhang, Ya Jun Zhou, Long Li, Jian Shuai, Gui Ju Cai, Long Li
Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, People's Republic of China Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Feb;54(2):114-26. doi: 10.1177/0009922814545492. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
Accurate determination and detection of fever is essential in the appropriate treatment of pediatric population. It is widely known that improper definitions of fever can cause grave and dangerous consequences in medical procedures. Infrared tympanic thermometry seems a relatively new and popular alternative for traditional measurement in the diagnosis of pediatric fever. However, its accuracy in the diagnosis of fever remains a major concern.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medline, Ovid, Elsevier, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library.
Cross-sectional, prospective design.
Two investigators independently assessed selected studies and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with other reviewers.
A total of 25 articles were included in our meta-analysis. The summary estimates revealed that the pooled sensitivity was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68-0.72), pooled specificity was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.85-0.88), and pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 47.3 (95% CI = 29.76-75.18), for the diagnosis of fever using infrared tympanic thermometry. Additionally, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94, and Q* value was 0.87.
A total of 25 articles that encompassing 31 studies were analyzed. Based on our meta-analysis, accuracy of infrared tympanic thermometry in diagnosing fever is high. We can cautiously make conclusion that infrared tympanic thermometry should be widely used as fever of thermometer.
准确测定和检测发热对于儿科患者的恰当治疗至关重要。众所周知,发热定义不当会在医疗程序中导致严重且危险的后果。红外鼓膜测温法似乎是儿科发热诊断中传统测量方法的一种相对新颖且流行的替代方法。然而,其在发热诊断中的准确性仍是一个主要关注点。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medline、Ovid、爱思唯尔、谷歌学术和考科蓝图书馆。
横断面、前瞻性设计。
两名研究者独立评估所选研究并提取数据。分歧通过与其他评审员讨论解决。
我们的荟萃分析共纳入25篇文章。汇总估计显示,使用红外鼓膜测温法诊断发热时,汇总灵敏度为0.70(95%置信区间[CI]=0.68 - 0.72),汇总特异性为0.86(95%CI = 0.85 - 0.88),汇总诊断比值比为47.3(95%CI = 29.76 - 75.18)。此外,汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.94,Q*值为0.87。
共分析了包含31项研究的25篇文章。基于我们的荟萃分析,红外鼓膜测温法诊断发热的准确性较高。我们可以谨慎地得出结论,红外鼓膜测温法应作为发热测量仪被广泛使用。