Kaya Derya Ozer, Baltaci Gul, Toprak Ugur, Atay Ahmet Ozgur
Assistant Professor, School of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, Turkey.
Professor, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jul-Aug;37(6):422-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of manual therapy with exercise to kinesiotaping with exercise for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.
Randomized clinical before and after trial was used. Fifty-four patients diagnosed as having subacromial impingement syndrome who were referred for outpatient treatment were included. Eligible patients (between 30 and 60 years old, with unilateral shoulder pain) were randomly allocated to 2 study groups: kinesiotaping with exercise (n = 28) or manual therapy with exercise (n = 26). In addition, patients were advised to use cold packs 5 times per day to control for pain. Visual analog scale for pain, Disability of Arm and Shoulder Questionnaire for function, and diagnostic ultrasound assessment for supraspinatus tendon thickness were used as main outcome measures. Assessments were applied at the baseline and after completing 6 weeks of related interventions.
At the baseline, there was no difference between the 2 group characteristics (P > .05). There were significant differences in both groups before and after treatment in terms of pain decrease and improvement of Disability of Arm and Shoulder Questionnaire scores (P < .05). No difference was observed on ultrasound for tendon thickness after treatment in both groups (P > .05). The only difference between the groups was at night pain, resulting in favor of the kinesiotaping with exercise group (P < .05).
For the group of subjects studied, no differences were found between kinesiotaping with exercise and manual therapy with exercise. Both treatments may have similar results in reducing pain and disability in subacromial impingement in 6 weeks.
本研究旨在比较手法治疗结合运动与肌内效贴布结合运动对肩峰下撞击综合征患者的疗效。
采用随机临床前后试验。纳入54例被诊断为肩峰下撞击综合征并转诊至门诊治疗的患者。符合条件的患者(年龄在30至60岁之间,单侧肩部疼痛)被随机分配到2个研究组:肌内效贴布结合运动组(n = 28)或手法治疗结合运动组(n = 26)。此外,建议患者每天使用冷敷袋5次以控制疼痛。疼痛视觉模拟量表、手臂与肩部功能障碍问卷以及肩袖肌腱厚度的诊断性超声评估用作主要结局指标。在基线时以及完成6周相关干预后进行评估。
在基线时,两组特征之间无差异(P > .05)。两组在治疗前后的疼痛减轻以及手臂与肩部功能障碍问卷评分改善方面均存在显著差异(P < .05)。两组治疗后在超声检查的肌腱厚度方面未观察到差异(P > .05)。两组之间的唯一差异在于夜间疼痛,肌内效贴布结合运动组更具优势(P < .05)。
对于所研究的受试者群体,肌内效贴布结合运动与手法治疗结合运动之间未发现差异。两种治疗方法在6周内减轻肩峰下撞击的疼痛和功能障碍方面可能具有相似的效果。