Suppr超能文献

超声引导下经皮电解治疗作为肩峰下疼痛综合征运动和手法治疗的辅助手段:一项随机临床试验。

Ultrasound-Guided Application of Percutaneous Electrolysis as an Adjunct to Exercise and Manual Therapy for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.

Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.; Cátedra de Investigación y Docencia en Fisioterapia: Terapia Manual y Punción Seca, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.

出版信息

J Pain. 2018 Oct;19(10):1201-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 May 16.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This randomized clinical trial compared the effects of adding ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneouselectrolysis into a program consisting of manual therapy and exercise on pain, shoulder-related disability, function, and pressure sensitivity in subacromial pain syndrome. Fifty patients with subacromial pain syndrome were randomized into manual therapy and exercise or percutaneous electrolysis group. All patients received the same manual therapy and exercise program, 1 session per week for 5 consecutive weeks. Patients assigned to the electrolysis group also received the application of percutaneous electrolysis at each session. The primary outcome was assessed using the Disabilitiesof the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included pain, function (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [SPADI]) pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and Global Ratingof Change (GROC). They were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Both groups showed similar improvements in the primary outcome (DASH) at all follow-ups (P = .051). Subjects receiving manual therapy, exercise, and percutaneous electrolysis showed significantlygreater changes in shoulder pain (P < .001) and SPADI (P < .001) than did those receiving manual therapy and exercise alone at all follow-ups. Effect sizes were large (standardized mean difference >.91) for shoulder pain and function at 3 and 6 months in favor of the percutaneous electrolysis group. No between-group differences in PPT were found. The current clinical trial found that the inclusion of US-guided percutaneous electrolysis in combination with manual therapy and exercise resulted in no significant differences for related disability (DASH) compared with the application of manual therapy and exercise alone in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Nevertheless, differences were reported for some secondary outcomes such as shoulder pain and function (SPADI). Whether these effects are reliable should be addressed in future studies.

PERSPECTIVE

This study found that the inclusion of US-guided percutaneous electrolysis into a manual therapy and exercise program resulted in no significant differences for disability and pressure pain sensitivity compared with the application of manual therapy and exercise alone in patients with subacromial pain syndrome.

摘要

本随机临床试验比较了在包含手动治疗和运动的方案中加入超声引导下经皮电解对肩峰下疼痛综合征的疼痛、与肩部相关的残疾、功能和压力敏感性的影响。50 名肩峰下疼痛综合征患者被随机分为手动治疗和运动组或经皮电解组。所有患者均接受相同的手动治疗和运动方案,每周 1 次,连续 5 周。接受电解治疗的患者在每次治疗时还接受经皮电解的应用。主要结果采用手臂、肩部和手残疾问卷(DASH)评估。次要结果包括疼痛、功能(肩痛和残疾指数 [SPADI])、压力疼痛阈值(PPT)和整体变化评级(GROC)。它们在基线、治疗后以及治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月时进行评估。两组在所有随访中均表现出主要结局(DASH)的相似改善(P=.051)。接受手动治疗、运动和经皮电解治疗的受试者在所有随访中在肩部疼痛(P <.001)和 SPADI(P <.001)方面的变化明显大于仅接受手动治疗和运动的受试者。在 3 个月和 6 个月时,肩部疼痛和功能的效应大小较大(标准化均数差>.91),有利于经皮电解组。未发现 PPT 存在组间差异。目前的临床试验发现,与单独应用手动治疗和运动相比,在超声引导下经皮电解的加入并没有使肩峰下疼痛综合征患者的相关残疾(DASH)产生显著差异。然而,在一些次要结局方面,如肩部疼痛和功能(SPADI),报告了一些差异。这些影响是否可靠,应该在未来的研究中解决。

观点

本研究发现,与单独应用手动治疗和运动相比,在包含手动治疗和运动的方案中加入超声引导下经皮电解对肩峰下疼痛综合征患者的残疾和压力疼痛敏感性没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验