Suppr超能文献

一种评估异菌脲、腐霉利、乙烯菌核利及其代谢物雄激素亲和力的计算方法。

A computational approach to evaluate the androgenic affinity of iprodione, procymidone, vinclozolin and their metabolites.

作者信息

Galli Corrado Lodovico, Sensi Cristina, Fumagalli Amos, Parravicini Chiara, Marinovich Marina, Eberini Ivano

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 11;9(8):e104822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104822. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Our research is aimed at devising and assessing a computational approach to evaluate the affinity of endocrine active substances (EASs) and their metabolites towards the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the androgen receptor (AR) in three distantly related species: human, rat, and zebrafish. We computed the affinity for all the selected molecules following a computational approach based on molecular modelling and docking. Three different classes of molecules with well-known endocrine activity (iprodione, procymidone, vinclozolin, and a selection of their metabolites) were evaluated. Our approach was demonstrated useful as the first step of chemical safety evaluation since ligand-target interaction is a necessary condition for exerting any biological effect. Moreover, a different sensitivity concerning AR LBD was computed for the tested species (rat being the least sensitive of the three). This evidence suggests that, in order not to over-/under-estimate the risks connected with the use of a chemical entity, further in vitro and/or in vivo tests should be carried out only after an accurate evaluation of the most suitable cellular system or animal species. The introduction of in silico approaches to evaluate hazard can accelerate discovery and innovation with a lower economic effort than with a fully wet strategy.

摘要

我们的研究旨在设计并评估一种计算方法,以评估内分泌活性物质(EASs)及其代谢物对人类、大鼠和斑马鱼这三种远缘物种雄激素受体(AR)配体结合域(LBD)的亲和力。我们基于分子建模和对接的计算方法,计算了所有选定分子的亲和力。评估了具有已知内分泌活性的三类不同分子(异菌脲、腐霉利、乙烯菌核利及其一系列代谢物)。由于配体与靶点的相互作用是发挥任何生物学效应的必要条件,我们的方法被证明是化学安全性评估的第一步。此外,计算得出受试物种对AR LBD的敏感性不同(大鼠是三者中最不敏感的)。这一证据表明,为了不过高/过低估计与使用化学物质相关的风险,只有在准确评估最合适的细胞系统或动物物种后,才应进一步进行体外和/或体内试验。引入计算机模拟方法来评估危害,可以比完全采用湿实验策略以更低的经济成本加速发现和创新。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验