Lawrence V A, Gafni A, Gross M
Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7879.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(12):1185-92. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90117-0.
The clinical effectiveness of the preoperative urinalysis is unproven, yet it is routinely obtained before surgery. To determine if the routine urinalysis might be economically beneficial, we evaluated its cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit. In the setting of elective clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee procedures, we estimated that: (1) nearly U.S. $7,000,000 is spent annually on preoperative urinalyses and associated costs; (2) given the best estimate of the increase in risk of wound infection attributable to urinary tract infection, 4.58 wound infections may be prevented annually, at a cost of $1,500,000 per wound infection prevented; (3) the cost of treating additional cases of wound infection, given no preoperative urinalysis, is approximately five hundred-fold less than the cost of screening with routine urinalyses. We conclude that the routine preoperative urinalysis is clinically and economically unsound before clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee surgery and probably before other types of clean-wound surgery. For this relatively inexpensive test, aggregate costs are disproportionately high and appear to outweight clinical benefits.
术前尿液分析的临床有效性尚未得到证实,但在手术前仍常规进行此项检查。为了确定常规尿液分析是否具有经济效益,我们评估了其成本效益和成本收益。在择期清洁伤口、非人工关节置换的膝关节手术中,我们估计:(1)每年在术前尿液分析及相关费用上花费近700万美元;(2)鉴于对因尿路感染导致伤口感染风险增加的最佳估计,每年可预防4.58例伤口感染,每预防一例伤口感染的成本为150万美元;(3)在不进行术前尿液分析的情况下,治疗额外伤口感染病例的成本比常规尿液分析筛查的成本低约500倍。我们得出结论,在清洁伤口、非人工关节置换的膝关节手术前,以及可能在其他类型的清洁伤口手术前,常规术前尿液分析在临床和经济上是不合理的。对于这项相对便宜的检查,总成本过高,且似乎超过了临床益处。