Suppr超能文献

术前尿液分析的未经证实的效用:经济评估

The unproven utility of the preoperative urinalysis: economic evaluation.

作者信息

Lawrence V A, Gafni A, Gross M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7879.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(12):1185-92. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90117-0.

Abstract

The clinical effectiveness of the preoperative urinalysis is unproven, yet it is routinely obtained before surgery. To determine if the routine urinalysis might be economically beneficial, we evaluated its cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit. In the setting of elective clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee procedures, we estimated that: (1) nearly U.S. $7,000,000 is spent annually on preoperative urinalyses and associated costs; (2) given the best estimate of the increase in risk of wound infection attributable to urinary tract infection, 4.58 wound infections may be prevented annually, at a cost of $1,500,000 per wound infection prevented; (3) the cost of treating additional cases of wound infection, given no preoperative urinalysis, is approximately five hundred-fold less than the cost of screening with routine urinalyses. We conclude that the routine preoperative urinalysis is clinically and economically unsound before clean-wound, non-prosthetic knee surgery and probably before other types of clean-wound surgery. For this relatively inexpensive test, aggregate costs are disproportionately high and appear to outweight clinical benefits.

摘要

术前尿液分析的临床有效性尚未得到证实,但在手术前仍常规进行此项检查。为了确定常规尿液分析是否具有经济效益,我们评估了其成本效益和成本收益。在择期清洁伤口、非人工关节置换的膝关节手术中,我们估计:(1)每年在术前尿液分析及相关费用上花费近700万美元;(2)鉴于对因尿路感染导致伤口感染风险增加的最佳估计,每年可预防4.58例伤口感染,每预防一例伤口感染的成本为150万美元;(3)在不进行术前尿液分析的情况下,治疗额外伤口感染病例的成本比常规尿液分析筛查的成本低约500倍。我们得出结论,在清洁伤口、非人工关节置换的膝关节手术前,以及可能在其他类型的清洁伤口手术前,常规术前尿液分析在临床和经济上是不合理的。对于这项相对便宜的检查,总成本过高,且似乎超过了临床益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验