Suppr超能文献

松果体肿瘤的发病率。文献综述。

Incidence of pineal tumours. A review of the literature.

作者信息

Mottolese C, Szathmari A, Beuriat P-A

机构信息

Neurological and Neurosurgical Hospital « P. Wertheimer », Pediatric Neurosurgery E, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69677 Bron, France.

Neurological and Neurosurgical Hospital « P. Wertheimer », Pediatric Neurosurgery E, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69677 Bron, France.

出版信息

Neurochirurgie. 2015 Apr-Jun;61(2-3):65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Aug 10.

Abstract

The knowledge of the incidence of pineal tumours is important not only for diagnostic care but also for its therapeutic programme. We reviewed the incidence of pineal tumours reported in literature in an attempt to establish if a difference existed between pineal gland tumours and the pineal region tumours as different authors use both expressions to indicate the same thing. The rate of frequency of these tumours is useful to guide the therapeutic choice for patients as the decisional tree is completely different for either germ cell tumours, pineal gland tumours or pineal gliomas and eventually papillary tumours of the pineal region. According to the French Register of pineal tumours, true pineal tumours represent: 27% pineal parenchymal tumours (PPT), 27% germ cell tumours, 17% gliomas, 8% papillary tumours. True pineal gland tumours are represented by: pineocytomas - (13%), pineal parenchymal tumours with intermediary differentiation PTT-ID - (66%) and pinealoblastomas - (21%). There was no statistical difference found between the French register and the Lyon series concerning histological diagnosis. It seemed to us important to discover its true incidence by comparing the data published in the literature and to stress the utility of the French Register for these uncommon tumours not only for recording new histological cases but also to document clinical symptomatology, therapeutic programmes, length of follow-up and clinical results for each patient treated. A better understanding of their natural history and improved evaluation of different treatments and their complications should contribute to improve clinical results.

摘要

了解松果体肿瘤的发病率不仅对诊断治疗很重要,对其治疗方案也很重要。我们回顾了文献中报道的松果体肿瘤的发病率,试图确定松果体肿瘤和松果体区域肿瘤之间是否存在差异,因为不同作者使用这两种表述来指代同一事物。这些肿瘤的发生率有助于指导对患者的治疗选择,因为对于生殖细胞肿瘤、松果体肿瘤、松果体胶质瘤以及最终的松果体区域乳头状肿瘤,决策树完全不同。根据法国松果体肿瘤登记处的数据,真正的松果体肿瘤包括:27%的松果体实质肿瘤(PPT)、27%的生殖细胞肿瘤、17%的胶质瘤、8%的乳头状肿瘤。真正的松果体肿瘤包括:松果细胞瘤 - (13%)、具有中间分化的松果体实质肿瘤PTT-ID - (66%)和松果体母细胞瘤 - (21%)。在组织学诊断方面,法国登记处和里昂系列之间未发现统计学差异。在我们看来,通过比较文献中发表的数据来发现其真实发病率很重要,并强调法国登记处对于这些罕见肿瘤的实用性,不仅用于记录新的组织学病例,还用于记录每位接受治疗患者的临床症状、治疗方案、随访时间和临床结果。更好地了解它们的自然史以及改进对不同治疗方法及其并发症的评估,应该有助于改善临床结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验