Department of Public Health and Policy, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK
Department of Geography, Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University, Stockton on Tees, UK.
BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3231. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3231.
To investigate whether the policy of increasing National Health Service funding to a greater extent in deprived areas in England compared with more affluent areas led to a reduction in geographical inequalities in mortality amenable to healthcare.
Longitudinal ecological study.
324 lower tier local authorities in England, classified by their baseline level of deprivation.
Differential trends in NHS funds allocated to local areas resulting from the NHS resource allocation policy in England between 2001 and 2011.
Trends in mortality from causes considered amenable to healthcare in local authority areas in England. Using multivariate regression, we estimated the reduction in mortality that was associated with the allocation of additional NHS resources in these areas.
Between 2001 and 2011 the increase in NHS resources to deprived areas accounted for a reduction in the gap between deprived and affluent areas in male mortality amenable to healthcare of 35 deaths per 100,000 population (95% confidence interval 27 to 42) and female mortality of 16 deaths per 100,000 (10 to 21). This explained 85% of the total reduction of absolute inequality in mortality amenable to healthcare during this time. Each additional £10 m of resources allocated to deprived areas was associated with a reduction in 4 deaths in males per 100,000 (3.1 to 4.9) and 1.8 deaths in females per 100,000 (1.1 to 2.4). The association between absolute increases in NHS resources and improvements in mortality amenable to healthcare in more affluent areas was not significant.
Between 2001 and 2011, the NHS health inequalities policy of increasing the proportion of resources allocated to deprived areas compared with more affluent areas was associated with a reduction in absolute health inequalities from causes amenable to healthcare. Dropping this policy may widen inequalities.
研究英格兰在贫困地区增加国民保健服务(NHS)资金投入的力度大于富裕地区的政策是否导致可通过医疗保健改善的死亡率的地域不平等现象有所减少。
纵向生态研究。
英格兰 324 个下层地方当局,按其基线贫困程度分类。
英格兰 NHS 资源分配政策在 2001 年至 2011 年期间导致地方地区 NHS 资金分配的差异趋势。
英格兰地方当局医疗保健可改善的死亡率趋势。使用多元回归,我们估计了在这些地区分配额外 NHS 资源与死亡率降低之间的关联。
在 2001 年至 2011 年期间,向贫困地区增加 NHS 资源使医疗保健可改善的男性死亡率在贫困地区和富裕地区之间的差距缩小了 35 例/每 10 万人(95%置信区间 27 至 42),女性死亡率缩小了 16 例/每 10 万人(10 至 21)。这解释了这段时间内医疗保健可改善的死亡率绝对不平等总减少量的 85%。每向贫困地区额外分配 1000 万英镑的资源,与男性每 10 万人减少 4 例死亡(3.1 至 4.9)和女性每 10 万人减少 1.8 例死亡(1.1 至 2.4)相关。与 NHS 资源绝对增加与更富裕地区医疗保健可改善的死亡率之间的关联不显著。
在 2001 年至 2011 年期间,与将资源分配给较富裕地区相比,NHS 卫生不平等政策增加贫困地区的资源分配比例与可通过医疗保健改善的疾病导致的绝对健康不平等减少有关。放弃这项政策可能会扩大不平等。