Suppr超能文献

水球运动功能性灵敏测试的可靠性。

The reliability of a functional agility test for water polo.

机构信息

University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2014 Jul 8;41:181-90. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0046. eCollection 2014 Jun 28.

Abstract

Few functional agility tests for water polo take into consideration its specific characteristics. The preliminary objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of an agility test for water polo players. Fifteen players (16.3 ± 1.8 years old) with a minimum of two years of competitive experience were evaluated. A Functional Test for Agility Performance (FTAP) was designed to represent the context of this sport. Several trials were performed to familiarize the athlete with the movement. Two experienced coaches measured three repetitions of the FTAP. Descriptive statistics, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), 95% limit of agreement (LOA), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM) were used for data analysis. It was considered that certain criteria of reliability measures were met. There was no significant difference between the repetitions, which may be explained by an effect of the evaluator, the ability of the players or fatigue (p > 0.05). The ICC average from evaluators was high (0.88). The SEM varied between 0.13 s and 0.49 s. The CV average considering each individual was near 6-7%. These values depended on the condition of measurement. As the FTAP contains some characteristics that create a degree of unpredictability, the same athlete may reach different performance results, increasing variability. An adjustment in the sample, familiarization and careful selection of subjects help to improve this situation and enhance the reliability of the indicators.

摘要

很少有针对水球的功能性敏捷测试考虑到其特定的特点。本研究的初步目的是评估水球运动员敏捷测试的可靠性。评估了 15 名(16.3±1.8 岁)具有至少两年竞技经验的球员。设计了一项功能性敏捷表现测试(FTAP)来代表该运动的背景。进行了多次试验以使运动员熟悉动作。两名经验丰富的教练测量了 FTAP 的三个重复。采用描述性统计、重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)、95%一致性界限(LOA)、组内相关系数(ICC)和测量标准误差(SEM)进行数据分析。认为满足了某些可靠性度量标准。重复之间没有显著差异,这可能是由于评估者的影响、运动员的能力或疲劳造成的(p>0.05)。评估者的 ICC 平均值较高(0.88)。SEM 介于 0.13 秒和 0.49 秒之间。考虑到每个个体的 CV 平均值接近 6-7%。这些值取决于测量条件。由于 FTAP 包含一些造成一定不可预测性的特征,同一运动员可能会达到不同的表现结果,从而增加了变异性。对样本进行调整、使运动员熟悉和仔细选择受试者有助于改善这种情况并提高指标的可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b82b/4120452/ede58ed36f6d/jhk-41-181f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验