Exercise and Sport Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle , Australia.
J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Mar 1;12(1):88-96. eCollection 2013.
Field sport coaches must use reliable and valid tests to assess change-of-direction speed in their athletes. Few tests feature linear sprinting with acute change- of-direction maneuvers. The Change-of-Direction and Acceleration Test (CODAT) was designed to assess field sport change-of-direction speed, and includes a linear 5-meter (m) sprint, 45° and 90° cuts, 3- m sprints to the left and right, and a linear 10-m sprint. This study analyzed the reliability and validity of this test, through comparisons to 20-m sprint (0-5, 0-10, 0-20 m intervals) and Illinois agility run (IAR) performance. Eighteen Australian footballers (age = 23.83 ± 7.04 yrs; height = 1.79 ± 0.06 m; mass = 85.36 ± 13.21 kg) were recruited. Following familiarization, subjects completed the 20-m sprint, CODAT, and IAR in 2 sessions, 48 hours apart. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed relative reliability. Absolute reliability was analyzed through paired samples t-tests (p ≤ 0.05) determining between-session differences. Typical error (TE), coefficient of variation (CV), and differences between the TE and smallest worthwhile change (SWC), also assessed absolute reliability and test usefulness. For the validity analysis, Pearson's correlations (p ≤ 0.05) analyzed between-test relationships. Results showed no between-session differences for any test (p = 0.19-0.86). CODAT time averaged 6 s, and the ICC and CV equaled 0.84 and 3.0%, respectively. The homogeneous sample of Australian footballers meant that the CODAT's TE (0.19 s) exceeded the usual 0.2 x standard deviation (SD) SWC (0.10 s). However, the CODAT is capable of detecting moderate performance changes (SWC calculated as 0.5 x SD = 0.25 s). There was a near perfect correlation between the CODAT and IAR (r = 0.92), and very large correlations with the 20-m sprint (r = 0.75-0.76), suggesting that the CODAT was a valid change-of-direction speed test. Due to movement specificity, the CODAT has value for field sport assessment. Key pointsThe change-of-direction and acceleration test (CODAT) was designed specifically for field sport athletes from specific speed research, and data derived from time-motion analyses of sports such as rugby union, soccer, and Australian football. The CODAT features a linear 5-meter (m) sprint, 45° and 90° cuts and 3-m sprints to the left and right, and a linear 10-m sprint.The CODAT was found to be a reliable change-of-direction speed assessment when considering intra-class correlations between two testing sessions, and the coefficient of variation between trials. A homogeneous sample of Australian footballers resulted in absolute reliability limitations when considering differences between the typical error and smallest worthwhile change. However, the CODAT will detect moderate (0.5 times the test's standard deviation) changes in performance.The CODAT correlated with the Illinois agility run, highlighting that it does assess change-of-direction speed. There were also significant relationships with short sprint performance (i.e. 0-5 m and 0-10 m), demonstrating that linear acceleration is assessed within the CODAT, without the extended duration and therefore metabolic limitations of the IAR. Indeed, the average duration of the test (6 seconds) is field sport-specific. Therefore, the CODAT could be used as an assessment of change-of-direction speed in field sport athletes.
场地运动教练必须使用可靠和有效的测试来评估运动员的变向速度。很少有测试具有带有急剧变向动作的直线冲刺。变向和加速测试(CODAT)旨在评估场地运动的变向速度,包括 5 米(m)直线冲刺、45°和 90°变向、左右 3 米冲刺和 10 米直线冲刺。本研究通过与 20 米冲刺(0-5、0-10、0-20 米区间)和伊利诺伊州敏捷跑(IAR)性能的比较,分析了该测试的可靠性和有效性。18 名澳大利亚足球运动员(年龄=23.83±7.04 岁;身高=1.79±0.06 米;体重=85.36±13.21 千克)被招募。在熟悉测试后,受试者在 2 次会话中完成了 20 米冲刺、CODAT 和 IAR,两次会话间隔 48 小时。组内相关系数(ICC)评估相对可靠性。通过配对样本 t 检验(p≤0.05)确定两次测试之间的差异,分析绝对可靠性。典型误差(TE)、变异系数(CV)和 TE 与最小有意义变化(SWC)之间的差异也评估了绝对可靠性和测试有用性。对于有效性分析,Pearson 相关系数(p≤0.05)分析了测试之间的关系。结果表明,任何测试都没有两次测试之间的差异(p=0.19-0.86)。CODAT 的平均用时约为 6 秒,ICC 和 CV 分别为 0.84 和 3.0%。同质的澳大利亚足球运动员样本意味着 CODAT 的 TE(0.19 秒)超过了通常的 0.2 x 标准差(SD)SWC(0.10 秒)。然而,CODAT 能够检测到中等的性能变化(SWC 计算为 0.5 x SD=0.25 秒)。CODAT 与 IAR 之间存在近乎完美的相关性(r=0.92),与 20 米冲刺之间存在非常大的相关性(r=0.75-0.76),这表明 CODAT 是一种有效的变向速度测试。由于运动的特异性,CODAT 对场地运动评估具有价值。关键点变向和加速测试(CODAT)是专为特定速度研究的场地运动运动员设计的,其数据源自橄榄球、足球和澳大利亚足球等运动的运动学分析。CODAT 具有 5 米(m)直线冲刺、45°和 90°变向和左右 3 米冲刺以及 10 米直线冲刺。考虑到两次测试之间的组内相关性和试验之间的变异系数,发现 CODAT 是一种可靠的变向速度评估方法。由于澳大利亚足球运动员的样本同质性,考虑到典型误差和最小有意义变化之间的差异,存在绝对可靠性限制。然而,CODAT 将检测到中等(测试标准差的 0.5 倍)的性能变化。CODAT 与伊利诺伊州敏捷跑相关,突出表明它确实评估了变向速度。与短冲刺表现(即 0-5 m 和 0-10 m)也存在显著关系,这表明 CODAT 评估了直线加速度,而无需进行 IAR 那样的延长时间和代谢限制。事实上,测试的平均持续时间(约 6 秒)是特定于场地运动的。因此,CODAT 可用于评估场地运动运动员的变向速度。