Suppr超能文献

头部和颈部区域减少失真读出分段回波平面成像的临床应用:初步经验

The clinical utility of reduced-distortion readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the head and neck region: initial experience.

作者信息

Koyasu Sho, Iima Mami, Umeoka Shigeaki, Morisawa Nobuko, Porter David A, Ito Juichi, Le Bihan Denis, Togashi Kaori

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2014 Dec;24(12):3088-96. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3369-5. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RS-EPI) diffusion weighted image (DWI) can diminish image distortion in the head and neck area, compared with single-shot (SS)-EPI DWI.

METHODS

We conducted phantom and patient studies using 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a 16-channel coil. For the phantom study, we evaluated distortion and signal homogeneity in gel phantoms. For the patient study, 29 consecutive patients with clinically suspicious parotid lesions were prospectively enrolled. RS-EPI and SS-EPI DWI were evaluated by two independent readers for identification of organ/lesion and distortion, using semiquantitative scales and quantitative scores. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and contrast-noise ratios of parotid tumours (if present; n = 15) were also compared.

RESULTS

The phantom experiments showed that RS-EPI provided less distorted and more homogeneous ADC maps than SS-EPI. In the patient study, RS-EPI was found to provide significantly less distortion in almost all organs/lesions (p < 0.05), according to both semiquantitative scales and quantitative scores. There was no significant difference in ADC values and contrast-noise ratios between the two DWI techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The distortion in DWI was significantly reduced with RS-EPI in both phantom and patient studies. The RS-EPI technique provided more homogenous images than SS-EPI, and can potentially offer higher image quality in the head and neck area.

KEY POINTS

The distortion in DWI is significantly reduced with RS-EPI compared with SS-EPI. Structures in the head and neck were identified more clearly using RS-EPI. No significant difference in ADC values was found between the techniques.

摘要

目的

与单次激发(SS)-回波平面成像扩散加权成像(DWI)相比,评估读出分割回波平面成像(RS-EPI)DWI能否减少头颈部区域的图像失真。

方法

我们使用16通道线圈通过3T磁共振成像(MRI)进行了体模和患者研究。对于体模研究,我们评估了凝胶体模中的失真和信号均匀性。对于患者研究,前瞻性纳入了29例临床怀疑腮腺病变的连续患者。由两名独立的阅片者使用半定量量表和定量评分评估RS-EPI和SS-EPI DWI用于识别器官/病变和失真的情况。还比较了腮腺肿瘤(如果存在;n = 15)的表观扩散系数(ADC)值和对比噪声比。

结果

体模实验表明,与SS-EPI相比,RS-EPI提供的ADC图失真更小且更均匀。在患者研究中,根据半定量量表和定量评分,发现RS-EPI在几乎所有器官/病变中的失真均明显更小(p <0.05)。两种DWI技术之间的ADC值和对比噪声比没有显著差异。

结论

在体模和患者研究中,RS-EPI均显著降低了DWI中的失真。RS-EPI技术比SS-EPI提供了更均匀的图像,并有可能在头颈部区域提供更高的图像质量。

关键点

与SS-EPI相比,RS-EPI显著降低了DWI中的失真。使用RS-EPI能更清晰地识别头颈部结构。两种技术之间的ADC值没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验