• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3.0特斯拉磁共振成像的表观扩散系数与乳腺癌的预后因素

Apparent diffusion coefficient on 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors in breast cancer.

作者信息

De Felice C, Cipolla V, Guerrieri D, Santucci D, Musella A, Porfiri L M, Meggiorini M L

出版信息

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35(4):408-14.

PMID:25118482
Abstract

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) provided by 3.0 Tesla diffusion-weighted imaging (3T DWI) varies with the prognostic factors Ki67 and grading in invasive breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with 75 invasive breast cancer lesions who had undergone 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local staging were enrolled. All lesions were confirmed by histologic and immunohistochemical analysis. MRI included both dynamic contrast-enhanced and DWI sequences. ADC value was obtained for each lesion. Histologic tumor grade was established according to the Nottingham Grading System (NGS), while Ki67 expression was evaluated by MM1 clone IgG1 mouse anti-human monoclonal antibody. Patients were divided into the following groups: grade 1 (G1), grade 2 (G2), grade 1 plus grade 2 (G1+G2) and grade 3 (G3), and low Ki67 (< or = 14%), intermediate Ki67 (15%-30%), and high Ki67 (> or = 30%). ADC values were compared with the G and Ki67 groups. Statistical comparison was carried out using the Mann-Whitney U and the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

RESULTS

ADC values were significantly higher in G3 than in G1+G2 tumors; no significant difference was observed when G1, G2, and G3 were compared. There was no statistically significant correlation between ADC values and Ki67 percentage (p > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

ADC values obtained on 3T DWI correlate with low (G1+G2) and high-grade (G3) invasive breast carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

ADC may be a helpful tool for identifying high-grade invasive breast carcinoma.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估3.0特斯拉扩散加权成像(3T DWI)所提供的表观扩散系数(ADC)是否随浸润性乳腺癌的预后因素Ki67和分级而变化。

材料与方法

纳入73例患有75个浸润性乳腺癌病灶且已接受3.0特斯拉磁共振成像(MRI)进行局部分期的患者。所有病灶均经组织学和免疫组化分析确诊。MRI包括动态对比增强和DWI序列。获取每个病灶的ADC值。根据诺丁汉分级系统(NGS)确定组织学肿瘤分级,而通过MM1克隆IgG1小鼠抗人单克隆抗体评估Ki67表达。患者分为以下几组:1级(G1)、2级(G2)、1级加2级(G1+G2)和3级(G3),以及低Ki67(≤14%)、中等Ki67(15%-30%)和高Ki67(≥30%)。将ADC值与G组和Ki67组进行比较。使用曼-惠特尼U检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯H检验进行统计学比较。

结果

G3肿瘤的ADC值显著高于G1+G2肿瘤;比较G1、G2和G3时未观察到显著差异。ADC值与Ki67百分比之间无统计学显著相关性(p>0.05)。

讨论

3T DWI获得的ADC值与低级别(G1+G2)和高级别(G3)浸润性乳腺癌相关。

结论

ADC可能是识别高级别浸润性乳腺癌的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Apparent diffusion coefficient on 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors in breast cancer.3.0特斯拉磁共振成像的表观扩散系数与乳腺癌的预后因素
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35(4):408-14.
2
Correlation between 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values and grading of invasive breast carcinoma.3T 表观扩散系数值与浸润性乳腺癌分级之间的相关性
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Dec;83(12):2144-2150. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
3
Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade.弥散加权成像与 T2WI 联合应用,包括表观扩散系数在乳腺病变中的诊断价值:对组织学分级的评估。
Acad Radiol. 2018 May;25(5):643-652. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.011. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
4
ADC at 3.0 T as a noninvasive biomarker for preoperative prediction of Ki67 expression in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast.3.0特斯拉磁共振成像的表观扩散系数作为乳腺浸润性导管癌术前预测Ki67表达的非侵入性生物标志物。
Clin Imaging. 2018 Nov-Dec;52:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
5
MR mammography using diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating breast cancer: a correlation with proliferation index.使用扩散加权成像的磁共振乳腺造影在评估乳腺癌中的应用:与增殖指数的相关性
Radiol Med. 2015 Oct;120(10):911-8. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0527-z. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
6
Role of perfusion parameters on DCE-MRI and ADC values on DWMRI for invasive ductal carcinoma at 3.0 Tesla.在 3.0T 磁共振弥散加权成像(DWMRI)上,灌注参数对浸润性导管癌的 DCE-MRI 和 ADC 值的作用。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec 21;16(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1538-8.
7
The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?扩散加权成像作为动态对比增强乳腺 MRI 的补充:它能帮助预测恶性肿瘤、组织学分级和复发吗?
Acad Radiol. 2019 Jul;26(7):923-929. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
8
Is there any relationship between adc values of diffusion-weighted imaging and the histopathological prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma?扩散加权成像的表观扩散系数值与浸润性导管癌的组织病理学预后因素之间是否存在关联?
Br J Radiol. 2018 Apr;91(1084):20170705. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170705. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors.扩散磁共振成像在乳腺癌特征描述中的应用:表观扩散系数与主要预后因素的相关性。
Radiol Med. 2015 Mar;120(3):268-76. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0442-8. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
10
On the Additional Information Provided by 3T-MRI ADC in Predicting Tumor Cellularity and Microscopic Behavior.3T-MRI表观扩散系数在预测肿瘤细胞密度及微观行为方面提供的额外信息
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;13(20):5167. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205167.

引用本文的文献

1
Promising Results About the Possibility to Identify Prostate Cancer Patients Employing a Random Forest Classifier: A Preliminary Study Preoperative Patients Selection.关于使用随机森林分类器识别前列腺癌患者可能性的有前景结果:一项术前患者选择的初步研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 10;15(4):421. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040421.
2
Multimodal apparent diffusion MRI model in noninvasive evaluation of breast cancer and Ki-67 expression.多模态表观扩散 MRI 模型在无创评估乳腺癌及 Ki-67 表达中的应用。
Cancer Imaging. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00780-x.
3
CNN-Based Approaches with Different Tumor Bounding Options for Lymph Node Status Prediction in Breast DCE-MRI.
基于卷积神经网络的不同肿瘤边界选项用于乳腺动态对比增强磁共振成像中淋巴结状态预测的方法
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;14(19):4574. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194574.
4
Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.乳腺癌亚型与定量磁共振成像:一项系统综述
Life (Basel). 2022 Mar 28;12(4):490. doi: 10.3390/life12040490.
5
3T MRI-Radiomic Approach to Predict for Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients.采用3T磁共振成像-影像组学方法预测乳腺癌患者的淋巴结状态
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 6;13(9):2228. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092228.
6
Three-dimensional pulsed continuous arterial spin labeling and intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: correlations with Ki-67 proliferation status.鼻咽癌的三维脉冲连续动脉自旋标记和体素内不相干运动成像:与Ki-67增殖状态的相关性
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Apr;11(4):1394-1405. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-349.
7
Can diffusion-weighted imaging predict tumor grade and expression of Ki-67 in breast cancer? A multicenter analysis.弥散加权成像能否预测乳腺癌的肿瘤分级和 Ki-67 表达?一项多中心分析。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Jun 19;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-0991-1.
8
Is there any relationship between adc values of diffusion-weighted imaging and the histopathological prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma?扩散加权成像的表观扩散系数值与浸润性导管癌的组织病理学预后因素之间是否存在关联?
Br J Radiol. 2018 Apr;91(1084):20170705. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170705. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers at 3.0T DW-MRI: A potential predictor for an oncotype Dx test recurrence score.在 3.0T 弥散加权磁共振成像中,雌激素受体阳性且淋巴结阴性的浸润性乳腺癌的表观扩散系数:一种用于预测 Oncotype DX 试验复发评分的潜在指标。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb;47(2):401-409. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25796. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Differentiation of Breast Lesions, Histpathologic Subgroups and Correlatıon with Prognostıc Factors using 3.0 Tesla MR.使用3.0特斯拉磁共振成像评估扩散加权成像及表观扩散系数值在乳腺病变鉴别、组织病理学亚组分析以及与预后因素相关性中的诊断价值
J Breast Health. 2016 Jul 1;12(3):123-132. doi: 10.5152/tjbh.2016.2897. eCollection 2016 Jul.