Suppr超能文献

原发性胃肠吻合术后早期的内镜检查

Endoscopy in the early postoperative setting after primary gastrointestinal anastomosis.

作者信息

Amr Mahmoud A, Alzghari Mohammad J, Polites Stephanie F, Khasawneh Mohammad A, Morris David S, Baron Todd H, Zielinski Martin D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery, Mary Brigh 2-810, St. Mary's Hospital, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Nov;18(11):1911-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2625-y. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal anastomoses may require early evaluation and treatment via flexible endoscopic techniques when complications arise. There is reticence, however, to perform endoscopy given the applied mechanical forces. We aimed to identify the incidence of gastrointestinal anastomotic perforation or disruption resulting from endoscopy performed ≤6 weeks of anastomoses.

METHODS

Review of patients from 2002 to 2013 who underwent flexible endoscopy within 6 weeks of creation of gastrointestinal anastomosis. Exclusion criteria included intraoperative endoscopy, anastomotic perforation prior to endoscopy, and endoscopy remote from the anastomotic site. Data are presented as median (interquartile range; IQR) or percentages as appropriate.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients met our criteria (age 69 years [IQR 54-77], 54% men]). Endoscopy was performed at a median postoperative time of 18 days (IQR 8-30). Indications for endoscopy included bleeding (66%), obstruction (13%), pain (13%), concern for pancreatic duct leak (4%), and concern for ischemia (4%). Six patients underwent therapeutic endoscopic procedures including coagulation (8%), balloon dilation (8%), tube decompression (8%), and stent placement (4%). There were no anastomotic perforations or disruptions as a result of endoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Despite theoretical risks of adverse events of flexible endoscopy in the early postoperative period, no endoscopic perforations or disruptions occurred in recently created surgical anastomoses.

摘要

引言

当出现并发症时,胃肠道吻合口可能需要通过灵活的内镜技术进行早期评估和治疗。然而,鉴于所施加的机械力,人们对于进行内镜检查有所顾虑。我们旨在确定在吻合术后≤6周进行内镜检查导致胃肠道吻合口穿孔或破裂的发生率。

方法

回顾2002年至2013年在胃肠道吻合术后6周内接受灵活内镜检查的患者。排除标准包括术中内镜检查、内镜检查前的吻合口穿孔以及远离吻合口部位的内镜检查。数据以中位数(四分位间距;IQR)或适当的百分比表示。

结果

24名患者符合我们的标准(年龄69岁[IQR 54 - 77],54%为男性)。内镜检查在术后中位时间18天(IQR 8 - 30)进行。内镜检查的指征包括出血(66%)、梗阻(13%)、疼痛(13%)、担心胰管漏(4%)和担心缺血(4%)。6名患者接受了治疗性内镜操作,包括凝血(8%)、球囊扩张(8%)、置管减压(8%)和支架置入(4%)。内镜检查未导致吻合口穿孔或破裂。

结论

尽管术后早期灵活内镜检查存在不良事件的理论风险,但近期创建的手术吻合口中未发生内镜穿孔或破裂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验