Suppr超能文献

全科医疗中衣原体检测的障碍与促进因素的叙述性综述。

Narrative review of the barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice.

作者信息

Yeung Anna, Temple-Smith Meredith, Fairley Christopher, Hocking Jane

出版信息

Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(2):139-47. doi: 10.1071/PY13158.

Abstract

As the cornerstone of Australian primary health care, general practice is a setting well suited for regular chlamydia testing but testing rates remain low. This review examines the barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice. Six databases--Medline, PubMed, Meditext, PsycInfo, Scopus and Web of Science--were used to identify peer-reviewed publications that addressed barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice using the following terms: 'chlamydia test*', 'STI test*' 'general practice', 'primary care', 'family medicine', 'barriers', 'facilitators' and 'enablers' from 1997 until November 2013. Data about the study design and key findings were extracted from the publications. A framework method was used to manage the data and organise publications into three categories -patient, general practitioner, and general practice. Key findings were then classified as a barrier or facilitator. Sixty-nine publications were included, with 41 quantitative studies, 17 qualitative studies, and 11 using mixed methods. Common barriers identified in all three groups included a lack of knowledge, awareness or training, demands on time and workload, and the social context of testing. Facilitators included the normalisation of testing, the use of nurses and other practice staff, education and incentives. Numerous barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice have been identified. While the barriers are well studied, many of the facilitators are not as well researched, and highlight areas for further study.

摘要

作为澳大利亚初级卫生保健的基石,全科医疗是一个非常适合定期进行衣原体检测的环境,但检测率仍然很低。本综述探讨了全科医疗中衣原体检测的障碍和促进因素。使用六个数据库——医学在线数据库(Medline)、医学期刊数据库(PubMed)、医学文本数据库(Meditext)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycInfo)、Scopus数据库和科学网(Web of Science)——来识别同行评审的出版物,这些出版物使用以下术语探讨了全科医疗中衣原体检测的障碍和促进因素:“衣原体检测*”、“性传播感染检测*”、“全科医疗”、“初级保健”、“家庭医学”、“障碍”、“促进因素”和“推动因素”,时间跨度为1997年至2013年11月。从这些出版物中提取了有关研究设计和主要发现的数据。采用框架法来管理数据,并将出版物分为三类——患者、全科医生和全科医疗。然后将主要发现归类为障碍或促进因素。共纳入69篇出版物,其中41篇为定量研究,17篇为定性研究,11篇为混合方法研究。在所有三组中确定的常见障碍包括知识、意识或培训的缺乏、时间和工作量的要求以及检测的社会背景。促进因素包括检测的常态化、护士和其他医护人员的使用、教育和激励措施。已确定了全科医疗中衣原体检测的众多障碍和促进因素。虽然对障碍进行了充分研究,但许多促进因素的研究并不充分,这突出了需要进一步研究的领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验