Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Nov;40(11):1718-26. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3431-4. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
Diaphragm function should be monitored in critically ill patients, as full ventilatory support rapidly induces diaphragm atrophy. Monitoring the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) may help assess the level of diaphragm activity, but such monitoring results are difficult to interpret because reference values are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe EAdi values in critically ill children during a stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), from the acute to recovery phases, and to assess the impact of ventilatory support on EAdi.
This was a prospective longitudinal observational study of children requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h. EAdi was recorded using a validated method in the acute phase, before extubation, after extubation, and before PICU discharge.
Fifty-five critically ill children were enrolled in the study. Median maximum inspiratory EAdi (EAdimax) during mechanical ventilation was 3.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.2-7.6] μV in the acute phase and 4.8 (IQR 2.0-10.7) μV in the pre-extubation phase. Periods of diaphragm inactivity (with no detectable inspiratory EAdi) were frequent during conventional ventilation, even with a low level of support. EAdimax in spontaneous ventilation was 15.4 (IQR 7.4-20.7) μV shortly after extubation and 12.6 (IQR 8.1-21.3) μV before PICU discharge. The difference in EAdimax between mechanical ventilation and post-extubation periods was significant (p < 0.001). Patients intubated mainly because of a lung pathology exhibited higher EAdi (p < 0.01), with a similar temporal increase.
This is the first systematic description of EAdi evolution in children during their stay in the PICU. In our patient cohort, diaphragm activity was frequently low in conventional ventilation, suggesting that overassistance or oversedation is common in clinical practice. EAdi monitoring appears to be a helpful tool to detect such situations.
在危重症患者中应监测膈肌功能,因为完全通气支持会迅速导致膈肌萎缩。监测膈肌的电活动(EAdi)可能有助于评估膈肌活动水平,但由于缺乏参考值,这种监测结果难以解释。本研究的目的是描述危重症儿童在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)入住期间,从急性期到恢复期的 EAdi 值,并评估通气支持对 EAdi 的影响。
这是一项对需要机械通气≥24 小时的儿童进行的前瞻性纵向观察研究。使用经过验证的方法在急性期、拔管前、拔管后和 PICU 出院前记录 EAdi。
本研究共纳入 55 例危重症患儿。机械通气时最大吸气 EAdi(EAdimax)中位数在急性期为 3.6[四分位距(IQR)1.2-7.6]μV,在拔管前阶段为 4.8(IQR 2.0-10.7)μV。即使支持水平较低,常规通气时也经常出现膈肌无活动期(无可检测到的吸气 EAdi)。拔管后不久,自主通气时 EAdimax 为 15.4(IQR 7.4-20.7)μV,在 PICU 出院前为 12.6(IQR 8.1-21.3)μV。机械通气与拔管后期间 EAdimax 的差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。因肺部疾病而插管的患者 EAdi 较高(p < 0.01),且 EAdi 呈相似的时间性增加。
这是首次系统描述 PICU 入住期间儿童 EAdi 的演变。在我们的患者队列中,常规通气时膈肌活动度经常较低,这表明在临床实践中过度辅助或过度镇静很常见。EAdi 监测似乎是一种有用的工具,可以发现这种情况。