• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家八哥的栖息地并非招募中心。

Common myna roosts are not recruitment centres.

作者信息

Sarangi Manaswini, Ganguly Payel, Arvind Chiti, Lakshman Abhilash, Vidya T N C

机构信息

Evolutionary and Organismal Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 14;9(8):e103406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103406. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0103406
PMID:25122467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4133212/
Abstract

We studied communal roosting in the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) in the light of the recruitment centre hypothesis and predation at the roost. The number and sizes of flocks departing from and arriving at focal roosts were recorded over a two year period. We also recorded the sizes and behaviour of foraging flocks. We found that flock sizes of birds departing from roosts at sunrise were larger than those at the feeding site, suggesting that there was no recruitment from the roosts. Flocks entering the roosts during sunset were larger on average than those leaving the following sunrise, suggesting no consolidation of flocks in the morning. Flocks entering the roosts at sunset were also larger on average than those that had left that sunrise, although there was no recruitment at the feeding site. There was no effect of group size on the proportion of time spent feeding. Contrary to expectation, single birds showed lower apparent vigilance than birds that foraged in pairs or groups, possibly due to scrounging tactics being used in the presence of feeding companions. Thus, the recruitment centre hypothesis did not hold in our study population of mynas. Predation at dawn and dusk were also not important to communal roosting: predators near the roosts did not result in larger flocks, and resulted in larger durations of arrival/departure contrary to expectation. Since flock sizes were smallest at the feeding site and larger in the evening than in the morning, but did not coincide with predator activity, information transfer unrelated to food (such as breeding opportunities) may possibly give rise to the evening aggregations.

摘要

我们根据招募中心假说和栖息地的捕食情况,对家八哥(Acridotheres tristis)的群居栖息行为进行了研究。在两年时间里,记录了离开和到达焦点栖息地的鸟群数量及规模。我们还记录了觅食鸟群的规模和行为。我们发现,日出时离开栖息地的鸟群规模比在觅食地的鸟群规模大,这表明栖息地没有新加入的鸟。日落时进入栖息地的鸟群平均规模比次日日出时离开的鸟群大,这表明早晨鸟群没有合并。日落时进入栖息地的鸟群平均规模也比当日日出时离开的鸟群大,尽管觅食地没有新加入的鸟。群体规模对取食时间比例没有影响。与预期相反,单独的鸟比成对或成群觅食的鸟表现出更低的明显警惕性,这可能是因为在有取食同伴在场时采用了偷窃策略。因此,招募中心假说在我们研究的家八哥种群中不成立。黎明和黄昏时的捕食对群居栖息也不重要:栖息地附近的捕食者并没有导致更大的鸟群,而且与预期相反,导致了更长的到达/离开持续时间。由于觅食地的鸟群规模最小,且晚上比早上大,但与捕食者活动不一致,与食物无关的信息传递(如繁殖机会)可能会导致晚上的聚集。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/20da1c0f57af/pone.0103406.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/8ab4cf26ec38/pone.0103406.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/1309fc878a74/pone.0103406.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/0545ab656cfd/pone.0103406.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/d5ee23c6255d/pone.0103406.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/92fcb55a50f0/pone.0103406.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/afdc23744c45/pone.0103406.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/20da1c0f57af/pone.0103406.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/8ab4cf26ec38/pone.0103406.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/1309fc878a74/pone.0103406.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/0545ab656cfd/pone.0103406.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/d5ee23c6255d/pone.0103406.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/92fcb55a50f0/pone.0103406.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/afdc23744c45/pone.0103406.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4133212/20da1c0f57af/pone.0103406.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Common myna roosts are not recruitment centres.家八哥的栖息地并非招募中心。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 14;9(8):e103406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103406. eCollection 2014.
2
Use of dairies by postreproductive flocks of European starlings.繁殖后期欧洲椋鸟群对奶制品的利用。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jul;96(7):4487-93. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6712. Epub 2013 May 16.
3
The benefit of being a social butterfly: communal roosting deters predation.作为一只社交蝴蝶的好处:群居栖息可以防止捕食。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 22;279(1739):2769-76. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0203. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
4
Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science.物以类聚:利用公民科学揭示椋鸟集群行为的奥秘
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 19;12(6):e0179277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179277. eCollection 2017.
5
Behavioural response of European starlings exposed to video playback of conspecific flocks: effect of social context and predator threat.欧洲椋鸟对同种鸟群视频回放的行为反应:社会环境和捕食者威胁的影响。
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
6
Communal roosts of the Blue-fronted Amazons (Amazona aestiva) in a large tropical wetland: Are they of different types?大型热带湿地中蓝额亚马逊鹦鹉(Amazona aestiva)的群居栖息地:它们属于不同类型吗?
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 17;13(10):e0204824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204824. eCollection 2018.
7
Some causes of the variable shape of flocks of birds.鸟类群体形状多变的一些原因。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022479. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
8
Differential fitness returns in relation to spatial position in groups.与群体中空间位置相关的差异化适应度回报。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994 May;69(2):187-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1994.tb01505.x.
9
Rich pickings near large communal roosts favor 'gang' foraging by juvenile common ravens, Corvus corax.大型群居栖息地附近丰富的食物资源有利于幼年普通渡鸦(Corvus corax)进行“群体”觅食。
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004530. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
10
Odour cues influence predation risk at artificial bat roosts in urban bushland.气味线索会影响城市林地中人工蝙蝠栖息地的捕食风险。
Biol Lett. 2013 May 1;9(3):20121144. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1144. Print 2013 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology.反正弦法很愚蠢:生态学中的比例分析。
Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10. doi: 10.1890/10-0340.1.
2
Cliff swallow colonies as information centers.崖燕群体作为信息中心。
Science. 1986 Oct 3;234(4772):83-5. doi: 10.1126/science.234.4772.83.
3
Social and sexual behaviours aid transmission of bacteria in birds.社交和性行为有助于鸟类体内细菌的传播。
Behav Processes. 2007 Jan 10;74(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
4
Ignorant hooded crows follow knowledgeable roost-mates to food: support for the information centre hypothesis.无知的寒鸦跟随有经验的同伴前往觅食地:对信息中心假说的支持。
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 22;268(1469):827-31. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1586.