• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物以类聚:利用公民科学揭示椋鸟集群行为的奥秘

Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science.

作者信息

Goodenough Anne E, Little Natasha, Carpenter William S, Hart Adam G

机构信息

School of Natural & Social Sciences, Francis Close Hall, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.

Royal Society of Biology, Charles Darwin House, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 19;12(6):e0179277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179277. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0179277
PMID:28628640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5476259/
Abstract

Pre-roost murmuration displays by European starlings Sturnus vulgaris are a spectacular example of collective animal behaviour. To date, empirical research has focussed largely on flock movement and biomechanics whereas research on possible causal mechanisms that affect flock size and murmuration duration has been limited and restricted to a small number of sites. Possible explanations for this behaviour include reducing predation through the dilution, detection or predator confusion effects (the "safer together" hypotheses) or recruiting more birds to create larger (warmer) roosts (the "warmer together" hypothesis). We collected data on size, duration, habitat, temperature and predators from >3,000 murmurations using citizen science. Sightings were submitted from 23 countries but UK records predominated. Murmurations occurred across a range of habitats but there was no association between habitat and size/duration. Size increased significantly from October to early February, followed by a decrease until the end of the season in March (overall mean 30,082 birds; maximum 750,000 birds). Mean duration was 26 minutes (± 44 seconds SEM). Displays were longest at the start/end of the season, probably due to a significant positive relationship with day length. Birds of prey were recorded at 29.6% of murmurations. The presence of predators including harrier Circus, peregrine Falco peregrinus, and sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus was positively correlated with murmuration size (R2 = 0.401) and duration (R2 = 0.258), especially when these species were flying near to, or actively engaging with, starlings. Temperature was negatively correlated with duration but the effect was much weaker than that of day length. When predators were present, murmurations were statistically more likely to end with all birds going down en masse to roost rather than dispersing from the site. Our findings suggest that starling murmurations are primarily an anti-predator adaptation rather than being undertaken to attract larger numbers of individuals to increase roost warmth.

摘要

欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)归巢前的集群飞行展示是动物集体行为的一个壮观例子。迄今为止,实证研究主要集中在鸟群运动和生物力学方面,而对影响鸟群规模和集群飞行持续时间的可能因果机制的研究一直有限,且仅限于少数地点。这种行为的可能解释包括通过稀释、探测或迷惑捕食者效应来减少捕食(“一起更安全”假说),或者吸引更多鸟类以形成更大(更温暖)的栖息地(“一起更温暖”假说)。我们通过公民科学收集了来自3000多次集群飞行的规模、持续时间、栖息地、温度和捕食者的数据。目击记录来自23个国家,但英国的记录占主导地位。集群飞行发生在一系列栖息地中,但栖息地与规模/持续时间之间没有关联。规模从10月到2月初显著增加,随后减少直至3月底季节结束(总体平均为30,082只鸟;最多750,000只鸟)。平均持续时间为26分钟(±44秒标准误)。展示在季节开始/结束时最长,可能是由于与白昼长度存在显著的正相关关系。在29.6%的集群飞行中记录到了猛禽。包括鹞(Circus)、游隼(Falco peregrinus)和雀鹰(Accipiter nisus)在内的捕食者的存在与集群飞行的规模(R2 = 0.401)和持续时间(R2 = 0.258)呈正相关,尤其是当这些物种靠近椋鸟飞行或与椋鸟积极互动时。温度与持续时间呈负相关,但影响远弱于白昼长度。当有捕食者存在时,从统计学上看,集群飞行更有可能以所有鸟类集体归巢而不是从该地点分散结束。我们的研究结果表明,椋鸟的集群飞行主要是一种反捕食适应,而不是为了吸引更多个体以增加栖息地的温暖程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/da1a4160f445/pone.0179277.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/9b412c3fc2da/pone.0179277.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/d02d00607aa8/pone.0179277.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/8e7c9dacfdc2/pone.0179277.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/b1c2703a4abf/pone.0179277.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/da1a4160f445/pone.0179277.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/9b412c3fc2da/pone.0179277.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/d02d00607aa8/pone.0179277.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/8e7c9dacfdc2/pone.0179277.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/b1c2703a4abf/pone.0179277.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/5476259/da1a4160f445/pone.0179277.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science.物以类聚:利用公民科学揭示椋鸟集群行为的奥秘
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 19;12(6):e0179277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179277. eCollection 2017.
2
Behavioural response of European starlings exposed to video playback of conspecific flocks: effect of social context and predator threat.欧洲椋鸟对同种鸟群视频回放的行为反应:社会环境和捕食者威胁的影响。
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
3
Common myna roosts are not recruitment centres.家八哥的栖息地并非招募中心。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 14;9(8):e103406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103406. eCollection 2014.
4
Influence of habitat and season on foraging flock composition in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris).栖息地和季节对欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)觅食鸟群组成的影响。
Oecologia. 1985 Dec;67(4):532-539. doi: 10.1007/BF00790025.
5
Complex patterns of collective escape in starling flocks under predation.椋鸟群在捕食情况下的复杂集体逃逸模式。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2019;73(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s00265-018-2609-0. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
6
Use of dairies by postreproductive flocks of European starlings.繁殖后期欧洲椋鸟群对奶制品的利用。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jul;96(7):4487-93. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6712. Epub 2013 May 16.
7
Flock2: A model for orientation-based social flocking. flock2:一种基于方向的群体聚集模型。
J Theor Biol. 2024 Oct 7;593:111880. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111880. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
8
Some causes of the variable shape of flocks of birds.鸟类群体形状多变的一些原因。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022479. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
9
A behavioral analysis of prey detection lateralization and unilateral transfer in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)猎物检测侧化和单侧转移的行为分析。
Behav Processes. 2008 Nov;79(3):125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
10
Vigilance and fitness in grey partridges Perdix perdix: the effects of group size and foraging-vigilance trade-offs on predation mortality.灰山鹑(灰山鹑)的警惕性与适应性:群体规模及觅食 - 警惕性权衡对捕食死亡率的影响
J Anim Ecol. 2007 Mar;76(2):211-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01194.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A robotic falcon induces similar collective escape responses in different bird species.机器隼在不同鸟类中诱导出相似的集体逃避反应。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 May;21(214):20230737. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0737. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Neutrophil swarming: Is a good offense the best defense?中性粒细胞聚集:主动出击是否就是最佳防御?
iScience. 2023 Aug 17;26(9):107655. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107655. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
3
Grand Challenge in Veterinary Imaging: Nothing Is More Constant Than Change.兽医影像学的重大挑战:变化是唯一不变的。

本文引用的文献

1
The confusion effect when attacking simulated three-dimensional starling flocks.攻击模拟三维椋鸟群时的混淆效应。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 18;4(1):160564. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160564. eCollection 2017 Jan.
2
Evolution of Swarming Behavior Is Shaped by How Predators Attack.群体行为的进化受捕食者攻击方式的影响。
Artif Life. 2016 Summer;22(3):299-318. doi: 10.1162/ARTL_a_00206. Epub 2016 May 3.
3
What underlies waves of agitation in starling flocks.椋鸟群中躁动浪潮的背后原因是什么。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jun 24;9:936754. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.936754. eCollection 2022.
4
Spatial dynamics of pathogen transmission in communally roosting species: Impacts of changing habitats on bat-virus dynamics.群居鸟类中病原体传播的空间动态:栖息地变化对蝙蝠-病毒动态的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Nov;90(11):2609-2622. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13566. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
5
European Starlings () as Vectors and Reservoirs of Pathogens Affecting Humans and Domestic Livestock.欧洲椋鸟作为影响人类和家畜的病原体的载体和宿主。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 10;11(2):466. doi: 10.3390/ani11020466.
6
Distressed in the queue? Psychophysiological and behavioral evidence for two alternative car-following techniques.在队列中感到苦恼?两种替代跟车技术的心理生理和行为证据。
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2020 Oct;74:418-432. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Complex patterns of collective escape in starling flocks under predation.椋鸟群在捕食情况下的复杂集体逃逸模式。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2019;73(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s00265-018-2609-0. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
8
Nonapeptide Receptor Distributions in Promising Avian Models for the Neuroecology of Flocking.用于集群行为神经生态学研究的有前景的鸟类模型中的九肽受体分布
Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 16;12:713. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00713. eCollection 2018.
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69(5):755-764. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-1891-3. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
4
Diffusion and topological neighbours in flocks of starlings: relating a model to empirical data.椋鸟群中的扩散与拓扑邻域:将模型与实证数据相关联
PLoS One. 2015 May 18;10(5):e0126913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126913. eCollection 2015.
5
Information transfer and behavioural inertia in starling flocks.椋鸟群中的信息传递与行为惯性
Nat Phys. 2014 Sep 1;10(9):615-698. doi: 10.1038/nphys3035.
6
Role of projection in the control of bird flocks.投影在鸟群控制中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111(29):10422-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402202111. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
7
Schools of fish and flocks of birds: their shape and internal structure by self-organization.鱼群和鸟群:通过自组织形成的形状和内部结构。
Interface Focus. 2012 Dec 6;2(6):726-37. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2012.0025. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
8
Predator confusion is sufficient to evolve swarming behaviour.捕食者混淆足以促使群体行为进化。
J R Soc Interface. 2013 Jun 5;10(85):20130305. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0305. Print 2013 Aug 6.
9
Regression with empirical variable selection: description of a new method and application to ecological datasets.基于经验变量选择的回归:一种新方法的描述及其在生态数据集上的应用。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034338. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
10
Murmurations.鸟群的迁徙
Curr Biol. 2012 Feb 21;22(4):R112-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.033.