Suppr超能文献

垂直纵跳中两种摆臂方式的分析

An analysis of two styles of arm action in the vertical countermovement jump.

作者信息

Gutiérrez-Dávila Marcos, Amaro Francisco J, Garrido Juan M, Javier Rojas F

出版信息

Sports Biomech. 2014 Jun;13(2):135-43. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2014.910832.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of two arm swing techniques, the simultaneous arm swing and the early arm swing, on vertical countermovement jump performance and on the contribution of the arms to vertical movement at the centre of mass (CM) during the propulsion phase. Participants were 28 athletes practicing sports in which the vertical jump constitutes a basic ability. Ground reaction forces were recorded by a force platform and the sagittal plane motion was recorded by a video camera. Although at take-off the vertical velocity (2.7 +/- 0.2m/s for simultaneous technique vs. 2.8 +/- 0.2m/s for early technique; p = 0.040) and position (1.18 +/- 0.06m for simultaneous vs. 1.17 +/- 0.05m for early; p = 0.033) of the CM were significantly different, no difference was observed in jump height (1.56 +/- 0.01m in both techniques). The arm action differed during the initial and final propulsion phases in both styles but the accumulated vertical contribution was similar. The practical implication in sports is that the use of the arm-swing technique to reach the maximum jump height should be determined by tactical demands instead of the technical execution of the arms.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定两种摆臂技术,即同步摆臂和提前摆臂,对垂直反向跳性能以及在蹬伸阶段手臂对质心(CM)垂直运动的贡献的影响。参与者为28名从事垂直跳是一项基本能力的运动项目的运动员。通过测力平台记录地面反作用力,并用摄像机记录矢状面运动。尽管在起跳时,质心的垂直速度(同步技术为2.7±0.2m/s,提前技术为2.8±0.2m/s;p = 0.040)和位置(同步为1.18±0.06m,提前为1.17±0.05m;p = 0.033)存在显著差异,但跳跃高度在两种技术中均无差异(均为1.56±0.01m)。两种方式在初始和最终蹬伸阶段的手臂动作不同,但累积的垂直贡献相似。在体育运动中的实际意义是,使用摆臂技术达到最大跳跃高度应根据战术需求而非手臂的技术执行来决定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验