Jacobson Gary P, Piker Erin G, Watford Kenneth E, Gruenwald Jill, Wanna George B, Rivas Alejandro
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):779-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 14.
The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether there are significant differences in patient/healthcare provider perceptions of patient's dizziness severity, dizziness disability/handicap, anxiety, and signs of autonomic system activation.
This was a prospective investigation of 30 patient-provider dyads drawn as a sample of convenience from an otology clinic in a large, tertiary care, medical center. Patients completed both the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and the Vestibular Symptom Scale (VSS) prior to vestibular function testing. Providers were instructed to complete the same measures following the patient's clinic visit from what they estimated was the patient's point of view. The two measures were analyzed for concordance and discordance.
Patient/provider differences in DHI and VSS vertigo subscale scores were not significantly different. However, difference scores on the VSS anxiety/autonomic subscale indicated that providers significantly under-estimated patient anxiety and symptoms of autonomic system activation.
The results suggest that providers may be missing information pertinent to the role anxiety and autonomic system activation may play in patient visits for complaints of dizziness. We suggest that this problem can be mitigated by administrating to patients prior to their clinic visit a standardized measure that quantifies patient self-report dizziness, vertigo, anxiety and autonomic system arousal. Patterns of response by patients on these measures can enable providers to diagnose correctly dizziness disorders that are rooted in clinically significant anxiety either related to, or unrelated to, a history of vestibular system impairment.
本研究的目的是确定患者/医疗服务提供者在对患者头晕严重程度、头晕残疾/障碍、焦虑以及自主神经系统激活体征的认知上是否存在显著差异。
这是一项前瞻性研究,从一家大型三级医疗中心的耳科诊所中方便抽样选取了30对患者-提供者。患者在进行前庭功能测试前完成了头晕残障量表(DHI)和前庭症状量表(VSS)。要求提供者在患者门诊就诊后,从他们估计的患者角度完成相同的测量。对这两项测量进行一致性和不一致性分析。
患者/提供者在DHI和VSS眩晕子量表得分上的差异无显著统计学意义。然而,VSS焦虑/自主子量表的差异得分表明,提供者显著低估了患者的焦虑和自主神经系统激活症状。
结果表明,提供者可能遗漏了与焦虑和自主神经系统激活在头晕患者就诊中可能发挥的作用相关的信息。我们建议,通过在患者门诊就诊前给予患者一项标准化测量来量化患者自我报告的头晕、眩晕、焦虑和自主神经系统唤醒,这个问题可以得到缓解。患者在这些测量上的反应模式能够使提供者正确诊断出源于与前庭系统损伤病史相关或无关的具有临床意义的焦虑的头晕障碍。