Patiño Daniel, Lavis John N, Moat Kaelan
McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada,
Department of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada,
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2013 Sep-Oct;15(5):684-93.
Different models may be used for explaining how research-based evidence is used in healthcare system policy-making. It is argued that models arising from a clinical setting (i.e. evidence-based policy-making model) could be useful regarding some types of healthcare system decision-making. However, such models are "silent" concerning the influence of political contextual factors on healthcare policy-making and are thus inconsistent with decision-making regarding the modification of healthcare system arrangements. Other political science-based models would seem to be more useful for understanding that research is just one factor affecting decision-making and that different types of research-based evidence can be used instrumentally, conceptual or strategically during different policy-making stages.
可以使用不同的模型来解释基于研究的证据如何在医疗保健系统决策中得到应用。有人认为,源自临床环境的模型(即循证决策模型)对于某些类型的医疗保健系统决策可能是有用的。然而,这类模型对于政治背景因素对医疗保健决策的影响“保持沉默”,因此与医疗保健系统安排调整的决策不一致。其他基于政治学的模型似乎对于理解研究只是影响决策的一个因素,以及在不同的决策阶段可以工具性、概念性或战略性地使用不同类型的基于研究的证据更为有用。