Urbanus Brittany L, Cox Ginnefer O, Eklund Emily J, Ickes Chelsea M, Schmidt Shelly J, Lee Soo-Yeun
Univ. of Illinois, 905 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
J Food Sci. 2014 Sep;79(9):S1763-8. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12558. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
Research concerning the sensory properties of beet and cane sugars is lacking in the scientific literature. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to determine whether a sensory difference was perceivable between beet and cane sugar sources in regard to their (1) aroma-only, (2) aroma and taste without nose clips, and (3) taste-only with nose clips, and to characterize the difference between the sugar sources using descriptive analysis. One hundred panelists evaluated sugar samples using a tetrad test. A significant difference (P < 0.05) was identified between beet and cane sugar sources when evaluated by aroma-only and taste and aroma without nose clips. However, there was no difference when tasted with nose clips. To characterize the observed differences, ten trained panelists identified and quantified key sensory attributes of beet and cane sugars using descriptive analysis. Analysis of variance indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) between sugar samples for 8 of the 10 attributes including: off-dairy, oxidized, earthy, and barnyard aroma, fruity and burnt sugar aroma-by-mouth, sweet aftertaste, and burnt sugar aftertaste. The sensory profile of beet sugar was characterized by off-dairy, oxidized, earthy, and barnyard aromas and by a burnt sugar aroma-by-mouth and aftertaste, whereas cane sugar was characterized by a fruity aroma-by-mouth and sweet aftertaste. This study shows that beet and cane sugar sources can be differentiated by their aroma and provides a sensory profile characterizing the differences. As sugar is used extensively as a food ingredient, sensory differences between beet and cane sugar sources once incorporated into different product matrices should be studied as a next step.
科学文献中缺乏关于甜菜糖和蔗糖感官特性的研究。因此,本研究的目的是确定在以下方面甜菜糖源和蔗糖源之间是否存在可察觉的感官差异:(1)仅香气方面;(2)不使用鼻夹时的香气和味道;(3)使用鼻夹时仅味道方面,并通过描述性分析来表征糖源之间的差异。100名品评员使用四点检验法对糖样品进行评估。在仅通过香气以及不使用鼻夹时评估香气和味道时,甜菜糖源和蔗糖源之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。然而,使用鼻夹品尝时没有差异。为了表征观察到的差异,10名经过训练的品评员使用描述性分析确定并量化了甜菜糖和蔗糖的关键感官属性。方差分析表明,在10种属性中的8种属性上,糖样品之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05),这些属性包括:乳香异味、氧化味、土腥味、谷仓味香气、口中果味和焦糖味香气、甜味余味以及焦糖味余味。甜菜糖的感官特征表现为乳香异味、氧化味、土腥味、谷仓味香气以及口中焦糖味香气和余味,而蔗糖的特征是口中果味香气和甜味余味。本研究表明,甜菜糖源和蔗糖源可以通过其香气进行区分,并提供了表征差异的感官特征描述。由于糖作为食品配料被广泛使用,下一步应研究甜菜糖源和蔗糖源一旦融入不同产品基质后的感官差异。