Mulheron Hannah, DuBois Aubrey, Mayhew Emily J
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
J Food Sci. 2024 Dec;89(12):9732-9741. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17461. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
Unlike many commercial sweeteners for which sweetness dose-response curves have been constructed, honey's sweetness has yet to be quantified. Honey differs from most commercial sweeteners in that it has a robust aroma; this aroma may impact its perceived sweetness. This study quantified the sweetness intensity and the impact of aroma on the perceived sweetness of four different honey varieties (clover, wildflower, alfalfa, and orange) compared to sucrose. Each sweetener evaluated was diluted to six concentrations in water ranging from 12.5 g/L to 125 g/L. Panelists (n = 55) rated the sweetness intensities with and without aroma, in replicate, on the Global Sensory Intensity Scale. Additionally, the volatile organic compounds in the honey samples were profiled using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis. Honey and sugar were equivalently sweet at a given concentration (g/L), with aroma present (p = 0.251). Additionally, honey and sugar were not equivalently sweet without aroma; aroma significantly increased sweetness intensities for all sweeteners (p = 0.042) and especially honeys. In a 100 g/L solution, the aromas in honey increased its sweetness by 23%-43%, depending on the floral source. Compounds with sweet aroma characteristics were identified at high concentrations in all honey samples using GC/MS analysis, including furfural, benzaldehyde, benzene acetaldehyde, and dimethyl sulfide. Additionally, (S)-limonene and toluene were present in high quantities in the orange and alfalfa samples. This study can inform appropriate honey usage levels and identify major volatiles that may enhance sweetness. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Honey sweetness has not been determined quantitatively, despite the widespread use of honey among consumers and product formulators. Sweetness enhancement by honey aroma volatiles may support a reduction in added sugars while maintaining sweetness intensity.
与许多已构建甜度剂量反应曲线的商业甜味剂不同,蜂蜜的甜度尚未被量化。蜂蜜与大多数商业甜味剂的不同之处在于它具有浓郁的香气;这种香气可能会影响其甜度感知。本研究量化了四种不同蜂蜜品种(三叶草、野花、苜蓿和橙子)与蔗糖相比的甜度强度以及香气对甜度感知的影响。将每种评估的甜味剂在水中稀释至六种浓度,范围从12.5克/升至125克/升。评估小组成员(n = 55)在有香气和无香气的情况下,重复使用全球感官强度量表对甜度强度进行评分。此外,使用气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC/MS)分析对蜂蜜样品中的挥发性有机化合物进行了分析。在给定浓度(克/升)且有香气存在的情况下,蜂蜜和糖的甜度相当(p = 0.251)。此外,在无香气时,蜂蜜和糖的甜度并不相当;香气显著提高了所有甜味剂的甜度强度(p = 0.042),尤其是蜂蜜。在100克/升的溶液中,蜂蜜中的香气使其甜度提高了23% - 43%,这取决于花源。使用GC/MS分析在所有蜂蜜样品中均鉴定出了具有甜香特征的化合物,包括糠醛、苯甲醛、苯乙醛和二甲基硫醚。此外,(S)-柠檬烯和甲苯在橙子和苜蓿样品中含量较高。本研究可为适当的蜂蜜使用水平提供参考,并识别出可能增强甜度的主要挥发性物质。实际应用:尽管蜂蜜在消费者和产品配方师中广泛使用,但其甜度尚未进行定量测定。蜂蜜香气挥发性物质增强甜度可能有助于在保持甜度强度的同时减少添加糖的使用。