• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化四种花蜜来源蜂蜜的甜度强度和香气影响。

Quantifying the sweetness intensity and impact of aroma in honey from four floral sources.

作者信息

Mulheron Hannah, DuBois Aubrey, Mayhew Emily J

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Food Sci. 2024 Dec;89(12):9732-9741. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17461. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1111/1750-3841.17461
PMID:39437307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11673473/
Abstract

Unlike many commercial sweeteners for which sweetness dose-response curves have been constructed, honey's sweetness has yet to be quantified. Honey differs from most commercial sweeteners in that it has a robust aroma; this aroma may impact its perceived sweetness. This study quantified the sweetness intensity and the impact of aroma on the perceived sweetness of four different honey varieties (clover, wildflower, alfalfa, and orange) compared to sucrose. Each sweetener evaluated was diluted to six concentrations in water ranging from 12.5 g/L to 125 g/L. Panelists (n = 55) rated the sweetness intensities with and without aroma, in replicate, on the Global Sensory Intensity Scale. Additionally, the volatile organic compounds in the honey samples were profiled using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis. Honey and sugar were equivalently sweet at a given concentration (g/L), with aroma present (p = 0.251). Additionally, honey and sugar were not equivalently sweet without aroma; aroma significantly increased sweetness intensities for all sweeteners (p = 0.042) and especially honeys. In a 100 g/L solution, the aromas in honey increased its sweetness by 23%-43%, depending on the floral source. Compounds with sweet aroma characteristics were identified at high concentrations in all honey samples using GC/MS analysis, including furfural, benzaldehyde, benzene acetaldehyde, and dimethyl sulfide. Additionally, (S)-limonene and toluene were present in high quantities in the orange and alfalfa samples. This study can inform appropriate honey usage levels and identify major volatiles that may enhance sweetness. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Honey sweetness has not been determined quantitatively, despite the widespread use of honey among consumers and product formulators. Sweetness enhancement by honey aroma volatiles may support a reduction in added sugars while maintaining sweetness intensity.

摘要

与许多已构建甜度剂量反应曲线的商业甜味剂不同,蜂蜜的甜度尚未被量化。蜂蜜与大多数商业甜味剂的不同之处在于它具有浓郁的香气;这种香气可能会影响其甜度感知。本研究量化了四种不同蜂蜜品种(三叶草、野花、苜蓿和橙子)与蔗糖相比的甜度强度以及香气对甜度感知的影响。将每种评估的甜味剂在水中稀释至六种浓度,范围从12.5克/升至125克/升。评估小组成员(n = 55)在有香气和无香气的情况下,重复使用全球感官强度量表对甜度强度进行评分。此外,使用气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC/MS)分析对蜂蜜样品中的挥发性有机化合物进行了分析。在给定浓度(克/升)且有香气存在的情况下,蜂蜜和糖的甜度相当(p = 0.251)。此外,在无香气时,蜂蜜和糖的甜度并不相当;香气显著提高了所有甜味剂的甜度强度(p = 0.042),尤其是蜂蜜。在100克/升的溶液中,蜂蜜中的香气使其甜度提高了23% - 43%,这取决于花源。使用GC/MS分析在所有蜂蜜样品中均鉴定出了具有甜香特征的化合物,包括糠醛、苯甲醛、苯乙醛和二甲基硫醚。此外,(S)-柠檬烯和甲苯在橙子和苜蓿样品中含量较高。本研究可为适当的蜂蜜使用水平提供参考,并识别出可能增强甜度的主要挥发性物质。实际应用:尽管蜂蜜在消费者和产品配方师中广泛使用,但其甜度尚未进行定量测定。蜂蜜香气挥发性物质增强甜度可能有助于在保持甜度强度的同时减少添加糖的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e45/11673473/6dd8489d94ed/JFDS-89-9732-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e45/11673473/10cd63658581/JFDS-89-9732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e45/11673473/6dd8489d94ed/JFDS-89-9732-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e45/11673473/10cd63658581/JFDS-89-9732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e45/11673473/6dd8489d94ed/JFDS-89-9732-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the sweetness intensity and impact of aroma in honey from four floral sources.量化四种花蜜来源蜂蜜的甜度强度和香气影响。
J Food Sci. 2024 Dec;89(12):9732-9741. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17461. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
Key aroma-active compounds in brown sugar and their influence on sweetness.红糖中的关键香气活性化合物及其对甜度的影响。
Food Chem. 2021 May 30;345:128826. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128826. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
3
Study on the mechanism of glucose-lowering and sweetening of key sweet aroma compounds in sweet orange.研究甜橙中关键甜味香气化合物的降血糖和增甜机制。
Food Res Int. 2024 Nov;196:114874. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114874. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
4
Sweetness Enhancement by Aromas: Measured by Descriptive Sensory Analysis and Relative to Reference Scaling.香气增强甜味:通过描述性感官分析测量,并与参考标度相关。
Chem Senses. 2020 May 21;45(4):293-301. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa012.
5
Volatile compounds of five types of unifloral honey in Northwest China: Correlation with aroma and floral origin based on HS-SPME/GC-MS combined with chemometrics.中国西北地区 5 种单花蜜的挥发性成分:基于 HS-SPME/GC-MS 结合化学计量学与香气和花香来源的相关性。
Food Chem. 2022 Aug 1;384:132461. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132461. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Characterization of the Aroma-Active Compounds in Banana () and Their Contributions to the Enhancement of Sweetness Perception.香蕉()中香气活性化合物的特征及其对增强甜味感知的贡献。
J Agric Food Chem. 2021 Dec 22;69(50):15301-15313. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c06434. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
7
The effect of mango aroma in low-sugar beverage: A sensory study on odor induced sweetness enhancement.低糖饮料中芒果香气的影响:气味诱导甜味增强的感官研究。
Food Res Int. 2024 Jul;188:114451. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114451. Epub 2024 May 4.
8
"More than Honey": Investigation on Volatiles from Monovarietal Honeys Using New Analytical and Sensory Approaches.《超越蜂蜜》:采用新型分析和感官方法对单花蜜挥发物的研究。
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Mar 14;66(10):2432-2442. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05009. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).使用时间性全选(TCATA)评估 16 种甜味剂的时间甜味和副味特征。
Food Res Int. 2019 Jul;121:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
Characterisation of the aroma profiles of different honeys and corresponding flowers using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry/olfactometry.使用固相微萃取和气相色谱-质谱联用/嗅觉测量法对不同蜂蜜及其相应花朵的香气特征进行表征。
Food Chem. 2015 Feb 15;169:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.125. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of Aroma, Sensory Properties, and Consumer Acceptability of Honey from L.来自L.的蜂蜜的香气、感官特性及消费者接受度的表征
Foods. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):1978. doi: 10.3390/foods14111978.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancement effect of odor and multi-sensory superposition on sweetness.气味和多感官叠加对甜味的增强作用。
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2023 Nov;22(6):4871-4889. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13245. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
2
Floral Markers in Honey of Various Botanical and Geographic Origins: A Review.不同植物和地理来源蜂蜜中的花源标记物:综述
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2010 Nov;9(6):620-634. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00130.x.
3
Functionality of Sugars in Foods and Health.食品与健康中糖类的功能
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016 May;15(3):433-470. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12194.
4
Identification of sugars and phenolic compounds in honey powders with the use of GC-MS, FTIR spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction.利用 GC-MS、傅里叶变换红外光谱和 X 射线衍射法鉴定蜂蜜粉中的糖和酚类化合物。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73306-7.
5
A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.16 种甜味剂的心理物理剂量反应行为比较。
Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11):1632. doi: 10.3390/nu10111632.
6
Flavor Alterations Associated with Miracle Fruit and Gymnema sylvestre.与奇迹果和匙羹藤相关的味道变化。
Chem Senses. 2018 Aug 24;43(7):481-488. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjy032.
7
"More than Honey": Investigation on Volatiles from Monovarietal Honeys Using New Analytical and Sensory Approaches.《超越蜂蜜》:采用新型分析和感官方法对单花蜜挥发物的研究。
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Mar 14;66(10):2432-2442. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05009. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
8
Dose-Response Analysis Using R.使用R进行剂量反应分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0146021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146021. eCollection 2015.
9
Honey: Chemical composition, stability and authenticity.蜂蜜:化学成分、稳定性与真实性。
Food Chem. 2016 Apr 1;196:309-23. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.051. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
10
Sensory differences between beet and cane sugar sources.甜菜和甘蔗糖源之间的感官差异。
J Food Sci. 2014 Sep;79(9):S1763-8. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12558. Epub 2014 Aug 14.