Mjoli Monde, Oosthuizen George, Clarke Damian, Madiba Thandinkosi
Department of Surgery, Pietermaritzburg Hospital Complex, University of KwaZulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa,
Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):747-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3710-8. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
Diaphragmatic injuries from penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma are notoriously difficult to detect with clinical and radiological evaluation. The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of diaphragmatic injury from penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma, clinical and radiological features predictive of a diaphragmatic injury and the feasibility of laparoscopic repair.
This is a prospective consecutive case series conducted in a metropolitan hospital complex. Fifty five patients were enrolled into the study and underwent a standardized laparoscopic procedure. Only stable patients were selected and right-sided penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries were excluded. The patients' clinical details, radiological findings, operative procedure, treatment of the diaphragmatic injury and complications were collected and analysed.
There were a total of 55 patients, of whom, 22 (40 %) had diaphragmatic injuries. The mean age was 26.3 ± 7.8 years (range 15-44) with a male:female ratio of 10:1. The causes of injury were stab in 54 (98.2 %) patients and firearm in one (1.8 %). Twenty six (47.3 %) patients had positive radiological findings, of which 10 (38.5 %) had a diaphragmatic injury. There were 6 (27.3 %) associated intra-abdominal injuries. Twenty one (95.5 %) of 22 patients with diaphragmatic injuries were successfully repaired laparoscopically. Mean duration of procedure with diaphragmatic repair was 74.9 ± 22.5 min compared to 38.3 ± 16.9 min without diaphragmatic repair. Six patients (10.9 %) had minor intra-operative complications. There were no deaths. Hospital stay was 2.9 ± 3.4 days.
Diaphragmatic injury was present in 40 % of patients with left-sided thoracoabdominal injury. Radiological findings were not reliable in predicting diaphragmatic injury. The majority of these injuries can be safely repaired laparoscopically.
穿透性胸腹联合伤所致膈肌损伤通过临床及影像学评估很难被发现。本研究旨在确定穿透性胸腹联合伤所致膈肌损伤的发生率、预测膈肌损伤的临床及影像学特征以及腹腔镜修补术的可行性。
这是在一家大都市医院综合院区进行的前瞻性连续病例系列研究。55例患者纳入本研究并接受标准化腹腔镜手术。仅选择病情稳定的患者,排除右侧穿透性胸腹联合伤患者。收集并分析患者的临床资料、影像学检查结果、手术过程、膈肌损伤的治疗及并发症情况。
共有55例患者,其中22例(40%)存在膈肌损伤。平均年龄为26.3±7.8岁(范围15 - 44岁),男女比例为10:1。致伤原因中,54例(98.2%)为刺伤,1例(1.8%)为火器伤。26例(47.3%)患者影像学检查结果为阳性,其中10例(38.5%)存在膈肌损伤。有6例(27.3%)合并腹腔内损伤。22例膈肌损伤患者中有21例(95.5%)成功接受了腹腔镜修补术。膈肌修补术的平均手术时长为74.9±22.5分钟,未进行膈肌修补术的平均手术时长为38.3±16.9分钟。6例患者(10.9%)出现轻微术中并发症。无死亡病例。住院时间为2.9±3.4天。
左侧胸腹联合伤患者中40%存在膈肌损伤。影像学检查结果在预测膈肌损伤方面不可靠。这些损伤中的大多数可通过腹腔镜安全修补。