Department of Surgery, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU), Pretoria, South Africa.
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Jun 14;12:27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0137-2. eCollection 2017.
The use of laparoscopy in managing haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries in developed countries is wildly practiced, but in Africa, the use of laparoscopy is still in its infancy stage. We reviewed a single centre experience in using laparoscopy in Africa for management of patients with both isolated diaphragmatic injuries as well as diaphragmatic injuries associated with intra-abdominal injuries requiring intervention.
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients presenting with penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries was done. All patients offered laparoscopic exploration and repair from January 2012 to December 2015 at Dr. George Mukhari Academic Hospital were analysed. Means (±SD) were presented for continuous variables, and frequencies (%) were presented for categorical variables. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
A total of 83 stable patients with penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries managed with laparoscopy met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The Injury Severity Score ranged from 8 to 24, with a median of 18. The incidence of diaphragmatic injuries was 54%. Majority (46.8%) of patients had Grade 3 (2-10 cm defect) diaphragmatic injury. Associated intra-abdominal injuries requiring intervention were encountered in 28 (62%) patients. At least 93.3% of the patients were treated exclusively with laparoscopy. The morbidity was encountered in 7 (16%) patients; the most common cause was a clotted haemothorax Clavien-Dindo III-b, but only 1 patient required a decortication. There was one non-procedure-related mortality.
A success rate of 93% in using laparoscopy exclusively was documented, with an overall 82% uneventful outcome. The positive outcomes found in this study when laparoscopy was used in stable patients with thoracoabdominal injuries support similar work done in other trauma centres. However, in addition, this study seem to suggest that the presence of peritonitis in stable patient is not a contra-indication to laparoscopy and thoracoscopy may be useful especially in right side diaphragmatic injury where the liver can preclude adequate visualization of the entire diaphragm and to thoroughly clean the chest cavity and prevent future complication such as residual clotted haemothorax. : The presence of peritonitis in stable patients with penetrating thoracoabdominal injury is not a contra-indication to laparoscopy provided the operating surgeon has adequate laparoscopic skills.
在发达国家,腹腔镜已广泛应用于治疗血流动力学稳定的穿透性胸腹损伤患者,但在非洲,腹腔镜的应用仍处于起步阶段。我们回顾了一家非洲中心在使用腹腔镜治疗单纯膈肌损伤和合并需要干预的腹腔内损伤的膈肌损伤患者方面的经验。
对 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间在乔治·穆卡里学术医院就诊的穿透性胸腹损伤患者前瞻性收集的数据进行了回顾性分析。所有患者均接受了腹腔镜探查和修复,对符合条件的患者进行了分析。连续变量用均数(±标准差)表示,分类变量用频率(%)表示。所有分析均使用 SAS 版本 9.3(SAS 研究所,卡里,NC)进行。
共纳入 83 例符合条件的稳定型穿透性胸腹损伤患者接受腹腔镜治疗,纳入本研究。损伤严重程度评分 8 至 24 分,中位数 18 分。膈肌损伤发生率为 54%。大多数(46.8%)患者膈肌损伤程度为 3 级(2-10 cm 缺损)。28 例(62%)患者合并需要干预的腹腔内损伤。至少 93.3%的患者仅接受腹腔镜治疗。7 例(16%)患者发生并发症;最常见的原因是血凝块性血胸 Clavien-Dindo III-b,但仅 1 例患者需要行开胸术。无 1 例非手术相关死亡。
本研究中,单纯使用腹腔镜的成功率为 93%,总体无并发症发生率为 82%。本研究中在稳定型胸腹损伤患者中使用腹腔镜取得了良好的效果,与其他创伤中心的类似工作结果一致。然而,本研究还表明,在稳定型患者中即使存在腹膜炎也不是腹腔镜的禁忌症,胸腔镜可能特别有用,尤其是在右侧膈肌损伤中,肝脏可能会妨碍对整个膈肌的充分观察,并彻底清理胸腔,防止将来出现残余血凝块性血胸等并发症。因此,在具备足够腹腔镜技能的情况下,稳定型穿透性胸腹损伤患者存在腹膜炎并不是腹腔镜的禁忌症。