• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多排螺旋 CT 扫描对穿透性膈肌损伤的诊断价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic utility of multidetector CT scan in penetrating diaphragmatic injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), 1441 Eastlake Ave Ste 2315, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Emerg Radiol. 2023 Dec;30(6):765-776. doi: 10.1007/s10140-023-02174-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10140-023-02174-1
PMID:37792116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10695863/
Abstract

Penetrating diaphragmatic injuries pose diagnostic and management challenges. Computed tomography (CT) scans are valuable for stable patients, but concern exists for missed injuries and complications in nonoperatively managed cases. The objective of this study was to explore the diagnostic utility of multidetector CT scan (MDCT) in identifying diaphragmatic injuries resulting from penetrating trauma. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, following established guidelines, by searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases up to July 6, 2023. Eligible studies reporting MDCT's diagnostic accuracy in detecting penetrating diaphragmatic injuries were included. Relevant data elements were extracted and analyzed using STATA software. The study included 9 articles comprising 294 patients with confirmed penetrating diaphragmatic injuries through surgical procedures. MDCT's diagnostic performance revealed a pooled sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 56%-87%) and a pooled specificity of 92% (95% CI: 79%-97%) (Fig. two), with significant heterogeneity in both sensitivity and specificity across the studies. The Fagan plot demonstrated that higher pre-test probabilities correlated with higher positive post-test probabilities for penetrating diaphragmatic injury diagnosis using MDCT, but even with negative results, there remained a small chance of having the injury, especially in cases with higher pre-test probabilities. This study highlights MDCT's effectiveness in detecting diaphragmatic injury from penetrating trauma, with moderate to high diagnostic accuracy. However, larger sample sizes, multicenter collaborations, and prospective designs are needed to address observed heterogeneity, enhancing understanding and consistency in MDCT's diagnostic capabilities in this context.

摘要

穿透性膈肌损伤具有诊断和处理上的挑战性。计算机断层扫描(CT)对稳定的患者具有重要价值,但在非手术治疗的病例中,存在对遗漏损伤和并发症的担忧。本研究的目的是探讨多排 CT 扫描(MDCT)在识别穿透性创伤引起的膈肌损伤中的诊断效用。按照既定指南,通过搜索 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Embase 数据库,对截至 2023 年 7 月 6 日的文献进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入了报告 MDCT 在检测穿透性膈肌损伤方面的诊断准确性的研究。使用 STATA 软件提取和分析相关数据元素。研究纳入了 9 项研究,共 294 例通过手术证实的穿透性膈肌损伤患者。MDCT 的诊断性能显示,敏感性的合并值为 74%(95%可信区间:56%-87%),特异性的合并值为 92%(95%可信区间:79%-97%)(图 2),各研究之间的敏感性和特异性均存在显著异质性。Fagan 图表明,较高的术前概率与使用 MDCT 对穿透性膈肌损伤诊断的较高阳性后验概率相关,但即使结果为阴性,仍有较小的损伤发生的可能性,尤其是在术前概率较高的情况下。本研究强调了 MDCT 在检测穿透性创伤引起的膈肌损伤方面的有效性,具有中等至高的诊断准确性。然而,需要更大的样本量、多中心合作和前瞻性设计,以解决观察到的异质性,提高对 MDCT 在这种情况下的诊断能力的理解和一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/83dc863c6332/10140_2023_2174_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/16183b813cad/10140_2023_2174_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/dcd78b6bb04a/10140_2023_2174_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/eafd75ea5922/10140_2023_2174_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/6239161fabbc/10140_2023_2174_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/83dc863c6332/10140_2023_2174_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/16183b813cad/10140_2023_2174_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/dcd78b6bb04a/10140_2023_2174_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/eafd75ea5922/10140_2023_2174_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/6239161fabbc/10140_2023_2174_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58ca/10695863/83dc863c6332/10140_2023_2174_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic utility of multidetector CT scan in penetrating diaphragmatic injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.多排螺旋 CT 扫描对穿透性膈肌损伤的诊断价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Emerg Radiol. 2023 Dec;30(6):765-776. doi: 10.1007/s10140-023-02174-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
Current trends in the diagnosis and management of traumatic diaphragmatic injuries: A systematic review and a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of blunt trauma.外伤性横膈膜损伤的诊断和处理的当前趋势:钝性创伤的系统评价和诊断准确性荟萃分析。
Injury. 2022 Nov;53(11):3586-3595. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
3
The incidence of thromboembolism formation following the use of recombinant factor VIIa in patients suffering from blunt force trauma compared with penetrating trauma: a systematic review.钝性创伤患者与穿透性创伤患者使用重组凝血因子VIIa后血栓栓塞形成的发生率:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):116-38. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2063.
4
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于 COVID-19 诊断的胸部影像学检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 16;5(5):CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub5.
5
What is the utility of the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) exam in penetrating torso trauma?经胸穿透性创伤中 Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma(FAST)检查的应用价值是什么?
Injury. 2011 May;42(5):482-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.249.
6
Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation.成人和儿童轻微头部损伤的诊断管理策略:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Aug;15(27):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta15270.
7
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
8
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
9
Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.子宫内膜异位症非侵入性诊断的成像方式
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2(2):CD009591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2.
10
The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)在结直肠癌术前分期中的价值:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(35):1-192, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15350.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in imaging techniques for monitoring the respiratory muscles.用于监测呼吸肌的成像技术进展。
Crit Care. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05339-1.
2
The Perception of the Diaphragm with Ultrasound: Always There Yet Overlooked?超声对膈肌的认识:一直存在却被忽视了?
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;15(2):239. doi: 10.3390/life15020239.
3
Comparative outcomes of blunt and penetrating diaphragmatic ruptures: A single trauma center study.钝性与穿透性膈肌破裂的比较结果:一项单创伤中心研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Usefulness of CT-scan in the management of chest stab trauma: a prospective observational study.CT扫描在胸部刺伤处理中的应用价值:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Dec;46(6):1385-1391. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01203-4. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Diagnosis of diaphragm injuries using modern 256-slice CT scanners: too early to abandon operative exploration.使用现代256层CT扫描仪诊断膈肌损伤:现在放弃手术探查还为时过早。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Nov 26;3(1):e000251. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000251. eCollection 2018.
3
Is non-operative approach applicable for penetrating injuries of the left thoraco-abdominal region?
Turk J Surg. 2024 Dec 27;40(4):312-319. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6514. eCollection 2024 Dec.
非手术方法适用于左胸腹区域穿透伤吗?
Turk J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 10;16(1):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2016.02.005. eCollection 2016 Mar.
4
Multi-slice computed tomography for diagnosis of combined thoracoabdominal injury.多层螺旋计算机断层扫描在诊断胸腹联合伤中的应用
Chin J Traumatol. 2015;18(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2014.11.002.
5
Evaluation of diaphragm in penetrating left thoracoabdominal stab injuries: The role of multislice computed tomography.穿透性左胸腹刺伤中膈肌的评估:多层螺旋计算机断层扫描的作用
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1734-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
6
Imaging of Traumatic Diaphragmatic Rupture: Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.创伤性膈肌破裂的影像学检查:一级创伤中心的诊断准确性评估
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2015 Nov;66(4):310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
7
Laparoscopy in the diagnosis and repair of diaphragmatic injuries in left-sided penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma: laparoscopy in trauma.腹腔镜检查在左侧穿透性胸腹联合伤膈肌损伤诊断与修复中的应用:创伤中的腹腔镜检查
Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):747-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3710-8. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
8
Computed tomography of blunt and penetrating diaphragmatic injury: sensitivity and inter-observer agreement of CT Signs.钝性和穿透性膈肌损伤的计算机断层扫描:CT征象的敏感性及观察者间一致性
Emerg Radiol. 2014 Apr;21(2):143-9. doi: 10.1007/s10140-013-1166-0. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
9
Penetrating diaphragmatic injury: accuracy of 64-section multidetector CT with trajectography.穿透性膈肌损伤:轨迹法 64 层多排 CT 的准确性。
Radiology. 2013 Sep;268(3):729-37. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121260. Epub 2013 May 14.
10
Imaging of the diaphragm: anatomy and function.膈肌的影像学表现:解剖与功能。
Radiographics. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):E51-70. doi: 10.1148/rg.322115127.