Caglayan E Kıyak, Caglayan K, Erdogan N, Cinar H, Güngör B
Bozok University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Adnan Menderes Bulvarı No:190, Yozgat, Turkey.
Bozok University, Medical Faculty, Department of Surgery, Yozgat, Turkey.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Oct;181:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
To compare the effectiveness of ethyl pyruvate (EP) with that of hyaluronic acid+carboxymethyl cellulose (Seprafilm) for the prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions. Seprafilm has been shown to be effective in many experimental and clinical studies.
Thirty rats were divided into three groups at random, and uterine horn abrasion was performed by laparotomy. One group received no treatment (control group), one group received a single intraperitoneal dose of EP 50mg/kg (EP group), and a 2×1-cm patch of Seprafilm was applied in the third group (Seprafilm group). All rats were killed 14 days after surgery. Macroscopic and histopathological evaluation were performed by a surgeon and a pathologist who were blinded to group allocation. Histopathologically, inflammation, fibroblastic activity, foreign body reaction, collagen proliferation, vascular proliferation, Masson-Trichrome score, matrix metalloproteinase-2 score and vascular endothelial growth factor score were studied.
Median macroscopic intraperitoneal adhesion scores for the control, EP and Seprafilm groups were 2.8, 1.2 and 1.1, respectively. Multiple comparisons between groups showed a significant difference (p<0.05). In binary comparisons, significant differences were found between the control group and the EP group, and between the control group and the Seprafilm group (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the adhesion scores for the EP group and the Seprafilm group (p>0.05). After histopathological evaluation, significant differences in all parameters were found between the groups (p<0.05). In the paired comparison, significant differences were found between the control group and the EP group, and between the control group and the Seprafilm group (p<0.0167), but no significant difference was found between the EP group and the Seprafilm group (p>0.0167).
In comparison with the untreated control group, EP and Seprafilm were found to reduce the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions. No significant difference was found between EP and Seprafilm.
比较丙酮酸乙酯(EP)与透明质酸+羧甲基纤维素(Seprafilm)预防腹腔粘连的效果。在许多实验和临床研究中,Seprafilm已被证明是有效的。
将30只大鼠随机分为三组,通过剖腹术进行子宫角擦伤。一组不接受治疗(对照组),一组腹腔内单次注射50mg/kg的EP(EP组),第三组应用一片2×1厘米的Seprafilm(Seprafilm组)。所有大鼠在手术后14天处死。由对分组情况不知情的外科医生和病理学家进行宏观和组织病理学评估。在组织病理学方面,研究了炎症、成纤维细胞活性、异物反应、胶原增殖、血管增殖、Masson三色评分、基质金属蛋白酶-2评分和血管内皮生长因子评分。
对照组、EP组和Seprafilm组的腹腔粘连宏观中位数评分分别为2.8、1.2和1.1。组间多重比较显示有显著差异(p<0.05)。在二元比较中,对照组与EP组之间以及对照组与Seprafilm组之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。EP组和Seprafilm组的粘连评分之间未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。经过组织病理学评估,各组之间在所有参数上均存在显著差异(p<0.05)。在配对比较中,对照组与EP组之间以及对照组与Seprafilm组之间存在显著差异(p<0.0167),但EP组和Seprafilm组之间未发现显著差异(p>0.0167)。
与未治疗的对照组相比,EP和Seprafilm均可减少腹腔粘连的形成。EP和Seprafilm之间未发现显著差异。