Moorfields Eye hospital NHS, 162 City Road, ECV1 2PD London, UK.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug 15;14:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-99.
This study assessed the barriers to sight impairment certification in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets amongst patients attending the Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Service (DRSS).
All patients who attended DRSS between 1stApril 2009 and 31st of March 2010 and whose recorded best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at DRSS fulfilled the requirements for sight impairment in the UK were included. An additional 24 patients whose general practitioners (GPs) reported them to be certified blind due to no perception of light (NPL) vision were re-examined to ascertain the reason for certification, and their potential social and visual aids needs.
78 patients were identified with certifiable vision and were reviewed: 10 deceased in the preceding 12 months; 60 were not known to be certified. Of these, 57 attended further assessment, 27 were found to have non-certifiable vision, 9 were referred for further interventions, 9 were certified and 9 were found to be eligible, but declined certification. Five patients were registered due to diabetic eye disease.Of those 24 reported by the GP of NPL vision, only 4 had true NPL, the rest had usable vision. Only two of them were certified blind due to diabetes.
Our data shows that sight certification in patients with diabetes might be underestimated and these patients often have non-diabetes related visual loss. We propose that data on certifiable visual impairment could serve, along with existing certification databases, as a resource for quality of care standards assessment and service provision for patients with diabetes.
本研究评估了在东伦敦塔哈姆雷特自治市的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查服务(DRSS)就诊的患者中视力障碍认证的障碍。
所有于 2009 年 4 月 1 日至 2010 年 3 月 31 日期间在 DRSS 就诊且其在 DRSS 处记录的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)符合英国视力障碍认证要求的患者均被纳入研究。另外还有 24 名患者的全科医生(GP)报告称他们因无光感(NPL)视力而被认证为失明,对他们进行了重新检查以确定认证的原因,并评估他们潜在的社会和视觉辅助需求。
确定了 78 名符合认证视力的患者进行了复查:其中 10 名在过去 12 个月内死亡;60 名未被认证。在这些患者中,57 名参加了进一步的评估,其中 27 名被发现视力无法认证,9 名被转介进行进一步干预,9 名被认证,9 名被发现符合认证条件,但拒绝了认证。有 5 名患者因眼部糖尿病病变而被登记。在 GP 报告的 NPL 视力的 24 名患者中,仅有 4 名患者有真正的 NPL,其余患者仍有可使用的视力。他们中只有两人因糖尿病而被认证为失明。
我们的数据表明,糖尿病患者的视力认证可能被低估了,这些患者通常有与糖尿病无关的视力损失。我们建议,可将有资格获得认证的视力障碍数据与现有的认证数据库一起,作为评估糖尿病患者护理质量标准和服务提供的资源。