Rossi Stephanie, Huang Samantha, Furtak Sharon C, Belliveau John W, Ahveninen Jyrki
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Psychology, California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Brain Res. 2014 Oct 2;1583:159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
Our ability to refocus auditory attention is vital for even the most routine day-to-day activities. Shifts in auditory attention can be initiated "voluntarily," or triggered "involuntarily" by unexpected novel sound events. Here we employed psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analyses of auditory functional MRI data, to compare functional connectivity patterns of distinct frontoparietal cortex regions during cued voluntary vs. novelty-driven involuntary auditory attention shifting. Overall, our frontoparietal seed regions exhibited significant PPI increases with auditory cortex (AC) areas during both cued and novelty-driven orienting. However, significant positive PPI patterns associated with voluntary auditory attention (cue>novel task regressor), but mostly absent in analyses emphasizing involuntary orienting (novel>cue task regressor), were observed with seeds within the frontal eye fields (FEF), superior parietal lobule (SPL), and right supramarginal gyri (SMG). In contrast, significant positive PPIs associated selectively with involuntary orienting were observed between ACs and seeds within the bilateral anterior interior frontal gyri (IFG), left posterior IFG, SMG, and posterior cingulate cortices (PCC). We also found indices of lateralization of different attention networks: PPI increases selective to voluntary attention occurred primarily within right-hemispheric regions, whereas those related to involuntary orienting were more frequent with left-hemisphere seeds. In conclusion, despite certain similarities in PPI patterns across conditions, the more dorsal aspects of right frontoparietal cortex demonstrated wider connectivity during cued/voluntary attention shifting, whereas certain left ventral frontoparietal seeds were more widely connected during novelty-triggered/involuntary orienting. Our findings provide partial support for distinct attention networks for voluntary and involuntary auditory attention.
即使是最日常的活动,我们重新聚焦听觉注意力的能力也至关重要。听觉注意力的转移可以“自愿地”启动,或者由意外的新声音事件“非自愿地”触发。在这里,我们采用了听觉功能磁共振成像数据的心理生理交互作用(PPI)分析,以比较在提示性自愿与新奇驱动的非自愿听觉注意力转移过程中,不同额顶叶皮层区域的功能连接模式。总体而言,在提示性和新奇驱动的定向过程中,我们的额顶叶种子区域与听觉皮层(AC)区域的PPI均显著增加。然而,在额叶眼区(FEF)、顶上小叶(SPL)和右侧缘上回(SMG)内的种子区域观察到,与自愿听觉注意力相关的显著正PPI模式(提示>新奇任务回归系数),但在强调非自愿定向的分析中(新奇>提示任务回归系数)大多不存在。相反,在双侧前内侧额叶回(IFG)、左侧后IFG、SMG和后扣带回皮质(PCC)内的AC与种子区域之间,观察到了选择性地与非自愿定向相关的显著正PPI。我们还发现了不同注意力网络的偏侧化指标:对自愿注意力有选择性的PPI增加主要发生在右半球区域,而与非自愿定向相关的PPI增加在左半球种子区域更为频繁。总之,尽管不同条件下的PPI模式存在某些相似之处,但右侧额顶叶皮层的背侧区域在提示性/自愿注意力转移过程中表现出更广泛的连接,而某些左侧腹侧额顶叶种子区域在新奇触发/非自愿定向过程中连接更广泛。我们的研究结果为自愿和非自愿听觉注意力的不同注意力网络提供了部分支持。