Geisler Minna E, O'Mahony Anne, Meaney Sarah, Waterstone John J, O'Donoghue Keelin
Cork Fertility Centre, Fernhurst Clinic, College Road, Cork, Ireland; Anu Research Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Wilton Road, Cork, Ireland.
Anu Research Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Wilton Road, Cork, Ireland.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Oct;181:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.033. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
Twin pregnancy is associated with increased obstetric and perinatal risk. There are conflicting reports on whether assisted conception (ART) further increases these risks. The aim of this study is to assess the obstetric and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies according to mode of conception.
A retrospective study of all viable dichorionic-diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancies (n=539) delivered at Cork University Maternity Hospital, Ireland between 2009 and 2012, divided according to spontaneous conception (SC) and ART conception, specifically IVF or ICSI.
The ART conceived group were on average 4 years older (36.8±4.23 vs 32.3±4.93 years) and more frequently nulliparous (73.7%; n=126 vs 36.1%; n=133) than their SC counterparts (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in maternal antenatal complications. ART twins were twice as likely to be delivered by caesarean section (CS) (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.76-3.14). There was no significant difference in the rates of preterm birth or NICU admission according to mode of conception. ART conceived twins were almost twice as likely to be delivered moderately preterm (32-33(+6)) (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.21-3.23) and were more likely to have RDS and neonatal hypoglycaemia
Twin pregnancy, irrespective of mode of conception, carries an increased risk of morbidity and mortality for both mother and babies and therefore couples should be counselled regarding the increased risk of iatrogenic twinning associated with double embryo transfer. However, for those that do conceive twins, they can be advised that assisted conception conveys no significant disadvantage over naturally conceived twin pregnancies.
双胎妊娠与产科及围产期风险增加相关。关于辅助受孕(ART)是否会进一步增加这些风险,存在相互矛盾的报道。本研究的目的是根据受孕方式评估双胎妊娠的产科及围产期结局。
对2009年至2012年间在爱尔兰科克大学妇产医院分娩的所有存活的双绒毛膜双羊膜囊(DCDA)双胎妊娠(n = 539)进行回顾性研究,根据自然受孕(SC)和ART受孕(具体为IVF或ICSI)进行分组。
ART受孕组的平均年龄比自然受孕组大4岁(36.8±4.23岁 vs 32.3±4.93岁),且初产妇比例更高(73.7%;n = 126 vs 36.1%;n = 133)(p<0.001)。产妇产前并发症无显著差异。ART双胎通过剖宫产(CS)分娩的可能性是自然受孕双胎的两倍(OR 2.35;95% CI 1.76 - 3.14)。根据受孕方式,早产率或新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入住率无显著差异。ART受孕的双胎中度早产(32 - 33(+6)周)的可能性几乎是自然受孕双胎的两倍(OR 1.98,95% CI 1.21 - 3.23),且更易患呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)和新生儿低血糖。
双胎妊娠,无论受孕方式如何,母婴的发病和死亡风险均会增加,因此应向夫妇咨询与双胚胎移植相关的医源性双胎风险增加的问题。然而,对于那些确实怀上双胎的夫妇,可以告知他们辅助受孕与自然受孕的双胎妊娠相比并无显著劣势。