Porta-Roda Oriol, Vara-Paniagua Jesús, Díaz-López Miguel A, Sobrado-Lozano Pilar, Simó-González Marta, Díaz-Bellido Paloma, Reula-Blasco María C, Muñoz-Garrido Francisco
Service of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Service of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pelvic Floor Unit, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Aug;34(6):533-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.22640. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
To compare the efficacy and safety of Kegel exercises performed with or without, vaginal spheres as treatment for women with urinary incontinence.
Multicentre parallel-group, open, randomized controlled trial. Women were allocated to either a pelvic floor muscle-training program consisting of Kegel exercises performed twice daily, 5 days/week at home, over 6 months with vaginal spheres, or to the same program without spheres. The primary endpoint was women's report of urinary incontinence at 6 months using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF). Secondary outcome measures were the 1 hr pad-test, King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and a five-point Likert scale for subjective evaluation. Adherence was measured with the Morisky-Green test.
Thirty-seven women were randomized to the spheres group and 33 to the control group. The primary endpoint was evaluated in 65 women (35 in the spheres group vs. 30 controls). ICIQ-UI-SF results improved significantly at 1-month follow-up in the spheres group (P < 0.01) and at 6 months in the controls. The 1 hr pad-test improved in the spheres group but not in the control group. No significant differences were found in the KHQ results or in the subjective evaluation of efficacy and safety. Adherence was higher in the spheres group but differences were not significant. Mild transient side effects were reported in four patients in the spheres group and one in the control group.
Both treatments improved urinary incontinence but women who performed the exercises with vaginal spheres showed an earlier improvement. Vaginal spheres were well tolerated and safe.
比较有无阴道球辅助进行凯格尔运动治疗女性尿失禁的疗效和安全性。
多中心平行组开放随机对照试验。女性被随机分配到两个组,一组是盆底肌肉训练计划,在家中每天进行两次凯格尔运动,每周5天,共6个月,使用阴道球辅助;另一组是相同的训练计划但不使用阴道球。主要终点是使用国际尿失禁咨询问卷简表(ICIQ-UI-SF)评估6个月时女性尿失禁的报告情况。次要结局指标包括1小时护垫试验、国王健康问卷(KHQ)以及用于主观评估的五点李克特量表。采用Morisky-Green测试衡量依从性。
37名女性被随机分配到阴道球组,33名被分配到对照组。65名女性(阴道球组35名,对照组30名)评估了主要终点。阴道球组在1个月随访时ICIQ-UI-SF结果显著改善(P<0.01),对照组在6个月时显著改善。1小时护垫试验在阴道球组有所改善,在对照组则未改善。KHQ结果以及疗效和安全性的主观评估未发现显著差异。阴道球组的依从性更高,但差异不显著。阴道球组有4名患者报告了轻微短暂的副作用,对照组有1名。
两种治疗方法均改善了尿失禁,但使用阴道球进行运动的女性改善更早。阴道球耐受性良好且安全。