Suppr超能文献

重新审视美国II型糖尿病筛查的年龄阈值

Reconsidering the age thresholds for type II diabetes screening in the U.S.

作者信息

Chung Sukyung, Azar Kristen M J, Baek Marshall, Lauderdale Diane S, Palaniappan Latha P

机构信息

Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto.

Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2014 Oct;47(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type II diabetes and its complications can sometimes be prevented, if identified and treated early. One fifth of diabetics in the U.S. remain undiagnosed. Commonly used screening guidelines are inconsistent.

PURPOSE

To examine the optimal age cut-point for opportunistic universal screening, compared to targeted screening, which is recommended by U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2010. Number of people needed to screen (NNS) to obtain one positive test result was calculated for different guidelines. Sampling weights were applied to construct national estimates. The 2010 Medicare fee schedule was used for cost estimation. Analysis was conducted in January 2014.

RESULTS

NNS, under universal screening, drops sharply at age 35 years, from 80 (30-34-year-olds) to 31 (35-39-year-olds). Opportunistic universal screening of eligible people aged ≥35 years would yield an NNS of 15, translating to $66 per positive test. Among people aged 35-44 years (who are not recommended for universal screening by ADA), most (71%) were overweight or obese and all had at least one other ADA risk factor. Only 34% of individuals aged ≥35 years met USPSTF criteria. Strictly enforcing USPSTF guidelines would have resulted in a majority (61%) of potential positive test cases being missed (5,508,164 cases nationwide).

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunistic universal screening among individuals aged ≥35 years could greatly reduce the national prevalence of undiagnosed pre-diabetes or diabetes at relatively low cost.

摘要

背景

如果能早期识别并治疗,2型糖尿病及其并发症有时是可以预防的。美国五分之一的糖尿病患者仍未被诊断出来。常用的筛查指南并不一致。

目的

与美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)和美国糖尿病协会(ADA)指南推荐的目标性筛查相比,研究机会性普遍筛查的最佳年龄切点。

方法

对2007 - 2010年全国健康与营养检查调查的具有全国代表性的样本进行横断面分析。针对不同指南计算获得一个阳性检测结果所需筛查的人数(NNS)。应用抽样权重来构建全国估计值。使用2010年医疗保险费用表进行成本估算。分析于2014年1月进行。

结果

在普遍筛查下,NNS在35岁时急剧下降,从80(30 - 34岁人群)降至31(35 - 39岁人群)。对年龄≥35岁的符合条件人群进行机会性普遍筛查,NNS为15,即每个阳性检测结果成本为66美元。在35 - 44岁人群(ADA不建议对其进行普遍筛查)中,大多数(71%)超重或肥胖,且所有人都至少有一项其他ADA风险因素。年龄≥35岁的个体中只有34%符合USPSTF标准。严格执行USPSTF指南会导致大多数(61%)潜在阳性检测病例被漏诊(全国共5508164例)。

结论

对年龄≥35岁的人群进行机会性普遍筛查可以以相对较低的成本大幅降低全国未诊断的糖尿病前期或糖尿病的患病率。

相似文献

1
Reconsidering the age thresholds for type II diabetes screening in the U.S.
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Oct;47(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
2
5
Utility of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for diabetes screening.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.026.
6
Performance of a Random Glucose Case-Finding Strategy to Detect Undiagnosed Diabetes.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):710-716. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
10
Frequency and determinants of screening for diabetes in the U.S.
Diabetes Care. 1994 Oct;17(10):1158-63. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.10.1158.

引用本文的文献

3
How do sex-specific BMI trajectories shape diabetes risk? A longitudinal analysis of Indonesian adults.
BMJ Public Health. 2023 Nov 6;1(1):e000020. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000020. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S27-S49. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S002.
6
2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S20-S42. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S002.
7
Regional high iron deposition on quantitative susceptibility mapping correlates with cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 30;17:1061156. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1061156. eCollection 2023.
8
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S19-S40. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S002.
10
Diabetes screening in South Korea: a new estimate of the number needed to screen to detect diabetes.
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 Jan;38(1):93-100. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.283. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of diabetes in U.S. youth in 2009: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study.
Diabetes Care. 2014 Feb;37(2):402-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1838. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
2
Utility of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for diabetes screening.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.026.
3
Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):807-16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.307.
4
False positive HIV diagnoses in resource limited settings: operational lessons learned for HIV programmes.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059906. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
5
Screening for prostate cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.
6
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2013.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-66. doi: 10.2337/dc13-S011.
7
Recommendations on screening for type 2 diabetes in adults.
CMAJ. 2012 Oct 16;184(15):1687-96. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120732.
8
Should we screen for type 2 diabetes: Yes.
BMJ. 2012 Jul 9;345:e4514. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4514.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验