Wang J M, Liu Q P, Zhang M L, Gong C, Liu S D, Chen W Y, Shen P, Lin H B, Gao P, Tang X
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
Yinzhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo 315101, Zhejiang, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Jun 18;54(3):450-457. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.03.009.
To evaluate the effectiveness of different screening strategies for type 2 diabetes to prevent cardiovascular disease in a community-based Chinese population from economically developed areas based on the Chinese electronic health records research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) study.
A Markov model was used to simulate different systematic diabetes screening strategies, including: (1) screening among Chinese adults aged 40-70 years recommended by the 2020 2 (Strategy 1); (2) screening among Chinese adults aged 35 to 70 years recommended by the 2022 (Strategy 2); and (3) screening among Chinese adults aged 35-70 years with overweight or obesity recommended by the 2021 2 (Strategy 3). According to the guidelines, individuals who were screened positively (fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L) would be introduced to intensive glycemic targets management (glycated hemoglobin < 7.0%).The Markov model simulated different screening scenarios for ten years (cycles) with parameters mainly from the CHERRY study or published literature. Number of cardiovascular disease events or deaths could be prevented and number needed to screen (NNS) were calculated to compare the effectiveness of the different strategies. One-way sensitivity analysis on the sensitivity of screening methods and probabilistic sensitivity analysis on uncertainties of diabetes incidence, the sensitivity of screening methods, and intensive glycemic management effects were conducted.
Totally 289 245 Chinese adults aged 35-70 years without cardiovascular diseases or diagnosed diabetes at baseline were enrolled. In terms of the number of cardiovascular disease events could be prevented, Strategy 1 for systematic diabetes screening among the adults aged 35-70 years was 222 (95% 180-264), Strategy 2 for systematic diabetes screening among the adults aged 40-70 years was 227 (95%: 185-271), and Strategy 3 for systematic diabetes screening among the adults aged 35-70 years with obesity or overweight (body mass index ≥ 24 kg/m) was 131 (95%: 98-164), compared with opportunistic screening. NNS per cardiovascular disease event for the strategies 1, 2 and 3 were 1 184 (95%: 994-1 456), 1 274 (95%: 1 067-1 564) and 814 (95%: 649-1 091), respectively. Compared with Strategy 1, NNS per cardiovascular disease event for Strategy 2 increased by 90 (95%: -197-381) with similar effectiveness of cardiovascular prevention; however, NNS per cardiovascular disease event for Strategy 3 was reduced by 460 (95%: 185-724) in contrast to the Strategy 2, suggesting that the Strategy 3 was more efficient. The results were consistent in multiple sensitivity analyses.
Systematic screening for diabetes based on the latest guidelines in economically developed areas of China can reduce cardiovascular events and deaths. However, merely lowering the starting age of screening from 40 to 35 years seems ineffective for preventing cardiovascular disease, while screening strategy for Chinese adults aged 35-70 years with overweight or obesity is recommended to improve efficiency.
基于中国鄞州电子健康记录研究(CHERRY),评估在中国经济发达地区的社区人群中,不同2型糖尿病筛查策略预防心血管疾病的有效性。
采用马尔可夫模型模拟不同的系统性糖尿病筛查策略,包括:(1)2020年推荐的对40 - 70岁中国成年人进行筛查(策略1);(2)2022年推荐的对35至70岁中国成年人进行筛查(策略2);(3)2021年推荐的对35 - 70岁超重或肥胖的中国成年人进行筛查(策略3)。根据指南,筛查呈阳性(空腹血糖≥7.0 mmol/L)的个体将被纳入强化血糖目标管理(糖化血红蛋白<7.0%)。马尔可夫模型以主要来自CHERRY研究或已发表文献的参数,模拟了十年(周期)内不同的筛查场景。计算可预防的心血管疾病事件或死亡数量以及筛查所需人数(NNS),以比较不同策略的有效性。对筛查方法的敏感性进行单向敏感性分析,并对糖尿病发病率的不确定性、筛查方法的敏感性以及强化血糖管理效果进行概率敏感性分析。
共纳入289245名35 - 70岁基线时无心血管疾病或已确诊糖尿病的中国成年人。就可预防的心血管疾病事件数量而言,对35 - 70岁成年人进行系统性糖尿病筛查的策略1为222例(95%:180 - 264),对40 - 70岁成年人进行系统性糖尿病筛查的策略2为227例(95%:185 - 271),对35 - 70岁肥胖或超重(体重指数≥24 kg/m²)成年人进行系统性糖尿病筛查的策略3为131例(95%:98 - 164),与机会性筛查相比。策略1、2和3每预防一例心血管疾病事件的NNS分别为1184例(95%:994 - 1456)、1274例(95%:1067 - 1564)和814例(95%:649 - 1091)。与策略1相比,策略2每预防一例心血管疾病事件的NNS增加了90例(95%: - 197 - 381),心血管预防效果相似;然而,与策略2相比,策略3每预防一例心血管疾病事件的NNS减少了460例(95%:185 - 724),表明策略3更有效。多项敏感性分析结果一致。
在中国经济发达地区基于最新指南进行系统性糖尿病筛查可减少心血管事件和死亡。然而,仅将筛查起始年龄从40岁降至35岁似乎对预防心血管疾病无效,而推荐对35 - 70岁超重或肥胖的中国成年人进行筛查以提高效率。