• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[基于决策分析马尔可夫模型的不同2型糖尿病筛查策略对中国社区人群心血管疾病预防的有效性]

[Effectiveness of different screening strategies for type 2 diabete on preventing cardiovascular diseases in a community-based Chinese population using a decision-analytic Markov model].

作者信息

Wang J M, Liu Q P, Zhang M L, Gong C, Liu S D, Chen W Y, Shen P, Lin H B, Gao P, Tang X

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.

Yinzhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo 315101, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Jun 18;54(3):450-457. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.03.009.

DOI:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.03.009
PMID:35701121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9197700/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of different screening strategies for type 2 diabetes to prevent cardiovascular disease in a community-based Chinese population from economically developed areas based on the Chinese electronic health records research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) study.

METHODS

A Markov model was used to simulate different systematic diabetes screening strategies, including: (1) screening among Chinese adults aged 40-70 years recommended by the 2020 2 (Strategy 1); (2) screening among Chinese adults aged 35 to 70 years recommended by the 2022 (Strategy 2); and (3) screening among Chinese adults aged 35-70 years with overweight or obesity recommended by the 2021 2 (Strategy 3). According to the guidelines, individuals who were screened positively (fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L) would be introduced to intensive glycemic targets management (glycated hemoglobin < 7.0%).The Markov model simulated different screening scenarios for ten years (cycles) with parameters mainly from the CHERRY study or published literature. Number of cardiovascular disease events or deaths could be prevented and number needed to screen (NNS) were calculated to compare the effectiveness of the different strategies. One-way sensitivity analysis on the sensitivity of screening methods and probabilistic sensitivity analysis on uncertainties of diabetes incidence, the sensitivity of screening methods, and intensive glycemic management effects were conducted.

RESULTS

Totally 289 245 Chinese adults aged 35-70 years without cardiovascular diseases or diagnosed diabetes at baseline were enrolled. In terms of the number of cardiovascular disease events could be prevented, Strategy 1 for systematic diabetes screening among the adults aged 35-70 years was 222 (95% 180-264), Strategy 2 for systematic diabetes screening among the adults aged 40-70 years was 227 (95%: 185-271), and Strategy 3 for systematic diabetes screening among the adults aged 35-70 years with obesity or overweight (body mass index ≥ 24 kg/m) was 131 (95%: 98-164), compared with opportunistic screening. NNS per cardiovascular disease event for the strategies 1, 2 and 3 were 1 184 (95%: 994-1 456), 1 274 (95%: 1 067-1 564) and 814 (95%: 649-1 091), respectively. Compared with Strategy 1, NNS per cardiovascular disease event for Strategy 2 increased by 90 (95%: -197-381) with similar effectiveness of cardiovascular prevention; however, NNS per cardiovascular disease event for Strategy 3 was reduced by 460 (95%: 185-724) in contrast to the Strategy 2, suggesting that the Strategy 3 was more efficient. The results were consistent in multiple sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Systematic screening for diabetes based on the latest guidelines in economically developed areas of China can reduce cardiovascular events and deaths. However, merely lowering the starting age of screening from 40 to 35 years seems ineffective for preventing cardiovascular disease, while screening strategy for Chinese adults aged 35-70 years with overweight or obesity is recommended to improve efficiency.

摘要

目的

基于中国鄞州电子健康记录研究(CHERRY),评估在中国经济发达地区的社区人群中,不同2型糖尿病筛查策略预防心血管疾病的有效性。

方法

采用马尔可夫模型模拟不同的系统性糖尿病筛查策略,包括:(1)2020年推荐的对40 - 70岁中国成年人进行筛查(策略1);(2)2022年推荐的对35至70岁中国成年人进行筛查(策略2);(3)2021年推荐的对35 - 70岁超重或肥胖的中国成年人进行筛查(策略3)。根据指南,筛查呈阳性(空腹血糖≥7.0 mmol/L)的个体将被纳入强化血糖目标管理(糖化血红蛋白<7.0%)。马尔可夫模型以主要来自CHERRY研究或已发表文献的参数,模拟了十年(周期)内不同的筛查场景。计算可预防的心血管疾病事件或死亡数量以及筛查所需人数(NNS),以比较不同策略的有效性。对筛查方法的敏感性进行单向敏感性分析,并对糖尿病发病率的不确定性、筛查方法的敏感性以及强化血糖管理效果进行概率敏感性分析。

结果

共纳入289245名35 - 70岁基线时无心血管疾病或已确诊糖尿病的中国成年人。就可预防的心血管疾病事件数量而言,对35 - 70岁成年人进行系统性糖尿病筛查的策略1为222例(95%:180 - 264),对40 - 70岁成年人进行系统性糖尿病筛查的策略2为227例(95%:185 - 271),对35 - 70岁肥胖或超重(体重指数≥24 kg/m²)成年人进行系统性糖尿病筛查的策略3为131例(95%:98 - 164),与机会性筛查相比。策略1、2和3每预防一例心血管疾病事件的NNS分别为1184例(95%:994 - 1456)、1274例(95%:1067 - 1564)和814例(95%:649 - 1091)。与策略1相比,策略2每预防一例心血管疾病事件的NNS增加了90例(95%: - 197 - 381),心血管预防效果相似;然而,与策略2相比,策略3每预防一例心血管疾病事件的NNS减少了460例(95%:185 - 724),表明策略3更有效。多项敏感性分析结果一致。

结论

在中国经济发达地区基于最新指南进行系统性糖尿病筛查可减少心血管事件和死亡。然而,仅将筛查起始年龄从40岁降至35岁似乎对预防心血管疾病无效,而推荐对35 - 70岁超重或肥胖的中国成年人进行筛查以提高效率。

相似文献

1
[Effectiveness of different screening strategies for type 2 diabete on preventing cardiovascular diseases in a community-based Chinese population using a decision-analytic Markov model].[基于决策分析马尔可夫模型的不同2型糖尿病筛查策略对中国社区人群心血管疾病预防的有效性]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Jun 18;54(3):450-457. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.03.009.
2
[Effectiveness of different screening strategies for cardiovascular diseases prevention in a community-based Chinese population: A decision-analytic Markov model].[基于社区的中国人群中不同心血管疾病预防筛查策略的有效性:决策分析马尔可夫模型]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Jun 18;53(3):460-466. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.03.004.
3
[Effectiveness of statin treatment strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in a community-based Chinese population: A decision-analytic Markov model].[他汀类药物治疗策略对中国社区人群心血管疾病一级预防的有效性:决策分析马尔可夫模型]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Jun 18;54(3):443-449. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.03.008.
4
[Comparison of aspirin treatment strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: A decision-analytic Markov modelling study].[阿司匹林用于心血管疾病一级预防的治疗策略比较:一项决策分析马尔可夫模型研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jun 18;55(3):480-487. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.03.014.
5
[Comparison of initiation of antihypertensive therapy strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Chinese population: A decision-analytic Markov modelling study].中国人群心血管疾病一级预防中抗高血压治疗策略起始的比较:一项决策分析马尔可夫模型研究
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jun 18;56(3):441-447. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.03.010.
6
[Effectiveness of different screening strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in a rural northern Chinese population].[中国北方农村人群心血管疾病一级预防中不同筛查策略的有效性]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Jun 18;50(3):443-449.
7
Cost-effectiveness of two screening strategies based on Chinese diabetes risk score for pre-diabetes in China.基于中国糖尿病风险评分的两种筛查策略在中国进行糖尿病前期的成本效益比较。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;10:1018084. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1018084. eCollection 2022.
8
Reconsidering the age thresholds for type II diabetes screening in the U.S.重新审视美国II型糖尿病筛查的年龄阈值
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Oct;47(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
9
10
A standardized vascular disease health check in europe: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在欧洲进行标准化的血管疾病健康检查:成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 15;8(7):e66454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066454. Print 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Body Mass Index and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.2型糖尿病患者体重指数与血糖控制的关联:一项横断面研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Feb 21;18:555-563. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S508365. eCollection 2025.
2
Global research trends of diabetes remission: a bibliometric study.全球糖尿病缓解研究趋势:文献计量研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 28;14:1272651. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1272651. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断:2022 年糖尿病医疗护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S17-S38. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S002.
2
Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetes in China, 2013-2018.中国糖尿病患病率及治疗状况 2013-2018 年
JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2498-2506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22208.
3
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.2021年欧洲心脏病学会临床实践中心血管疾病预防指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 7;42(34):3227-3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.
4
Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.筛查糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 24;326(8):736-743. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12531.
5
General Health Checks in Adult Primary Care: A Review.成人初级保健中的一般健康检查:综述。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2294-2306. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6524.
6
Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China.中国肥胖问题的健康政策和公共卫生影响。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jul;9(7):446-461. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00118-2. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
7
EQ-5D-3L Decrements by Diabetes Complications and Comorbidities in China.中国糖尿病并发症和合并症导致的EQ-5D-3L减损情况
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Apr;11(4):939-950. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00788-z. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
8
World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions.世界卫生组织心血管疾病风险图表:修订后的模型可估算 21 个全球区域的风险。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Oct;7(10):e1332-e1345. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30318-3. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
9
Using big data to improve cardiovascular care and outcomes in China: a protocol for the CHinese Electronic health Records Research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) Study.利用大数据改善中国心血管疾病护理及治疗效果:中国鄞州电子健康记录研究(CHERRY研究)方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 12;8(2):e019698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019698.
10
Screening for type 2 diabetes: do screen-detected cases fare better?2 型糖尿病筛查:筛查发现的病例预后更好吗?
Diabetologia. 2017 Nov;60(11):2200-2209. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4402-4. Epub 2017 Aug 23.