Hall Charlotte A, Lydon Helen L, Dalton Christopher H, Chipman J K, Graham John S, Chilcott Robert P
CBRN & Chemical Toxicological Research Group, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Health Protection Agency, Chilton, UK; School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
J Appl Toxicol. 2015 May;35(5):536-42. doi: 10.1002/jat.3019. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
The treatment of penetrating, haemorrhaging injuries sustained within a hazardous environment may be complicated by contamination with toxic chemicals. There are currently no specific medical countermeasures for such injuries. Haemostats with an absorbent mechanism of action have the potential to simultaneously stop bleeding and decontaminate wounds. However, a primary requirement of a 'haemostatic decontaminant' is the retention of clotting function in the presence of chemical contaminants. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the haemostatic efficacy of seven commercially available haemostats in the presence of toxic chemicals (soman, VX, sulphur mustard, petrol, aviation fuel and motor oil). Clot viscosity was assessed ex vivo using thrombelastography following treatment of pig blood with: (i) toxic chemical; (ii) haemostat; or (iii) haemostat in combination with toxic chemical. Several contaminants (VX, petrol and GD) were found to be pro-haemostatic and none had an adverse effect on the rate with which the test products attained haemostasis. However, the total clot strength for blood treated with certain haemostats in the presence of sulphur mustard, soman and petrol was significantly decreased. Three test products failed to demonstrate haemostatic function in this ex vivo (thrombelastography) model; this was tentatively ascribed to the products achieving haemostasis through a tamponade mechanism of action, which can only be replicated using in vivo models. Overall, this study has identified a number of commercial products that may have potential as haemostatic decontaminants and warrant further investigation to establish their decontaminant efficacy.
在危险环境中遭受的穿透性出血损伤的治疗可能会因有毒化学物质的污染而变得复杂。目前针对此类损伤尚无特定的医学应对措施。具有吸收作用机制的止血剂有可能同时止血和对伤口进行去污。然而,“止血去污剂”的一个主要要求是在存在化学污染物的情况下保持凝血功能。因此,本研究的目的是调查七种市售止血剂在有毒化学物质(梭曼、维埃克斯、芥子气、汽油、航空燃料和机油)存在时的止血效果。在用以下物质处理猪血后,使用血栓弹力图在体外评估凝块粘度:(i)有毒化学物质;(ii)止血剂;或(iii)止血剂与有毒化学物质组合。发现几种污染物(维埃克斯、汽油和沙林)具有促止血作用,且对测试产品达到止血的速度均无不利影响。然而,在芥子气、梭曼和汽油存在的情况下,用某些止血剂处理的血液的总凝块强度显著降低。三种测试产品在这个体外(血栓弹力图)模型中未能显示止血功能;初步认为这是由于这些产品通过填塞作用机制实现止血,而这只能在体内模型中复制。总体而言,本研究确定了一些可能具有作为止血去污剂潜力的商业产品,值得进一步研究以确定其去污效果。