Kampouropoulos D, Gaintantzopoulou M, Papazoglou E, Kakaboura A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2014 Jun;22(2):84-8.
Two shades of four resin cements (Calibra, Clearfil Esthetic, Insure, Variolink II), in light- and dual-curing modes, were tested for colour matching with their corresponding try-in pastes, immediately after photopolymerization and after 24-hour dry and dark storage. Colour measurements were performed for 0.8 mm-thick specimens through a 0.8mm-thick ceramic plate. For each resin cement, colour differences (deltaE) were calculated between the two curing modes, and between the corresponding try-in paste, at baseline and after 24h. deltaE>0 values were detected between all resin cements and their try-in pastes, which were brand/shade/curing mode depended. The try-in pastes of the Variolink II system demonstrated the best colour matching (deltaE<2). Try-in pastes of Calibra and Insure, at both curing modes, did not match at an acceptable value, the shade of their corresponding resin cements (deltaE>3.3). Calibra presented the highest colour differences. deltaE values of the Clearfil Esthetic system immediately after photo-activation ranged between 2 and 3 units. A ceramic restoration may fail aesthetically as a result of not acceptable colour match (deltaE>3.3) between the shade of certain resin cements and their relevant try-in pastes.
对四种树脂水门汀(Calibra、Clearfil Esthetic、Insure、Variolink II)的两种色号,在光固化和双重固化模式下,于光聚合后以及24小时干燥黑暗储存后,测试其与相应试戴糊剂的颜色匹配情况。通过0.8毫米厚的陶瓷板对0.8毫米厚的样本进行颜色测量。对于每种树脂水门汀,计算两种固化模式之间以及相应试戴糊剂在基线和24小时后的颜色差异(ΔE)。在所有树脂水门汀及其试戴糊剂之间均检测到ΔE>0的值,这些值取决于品牌/色号/固化模式。Variolink II系统的试戴糊剂表现出最佳的颜色匹配(ΔE<2)。Calibra和Insure的试戴糊剂在两种固化模式下,与其相应树脂水门汀的色号均未达到可接受的值匹配(ΔE>3.3)。Calibra呈现出最高的颜色差异。Clearfil Esthetic系统在光激活后立即的ΔE值在2至3个单位之间。由于某些树脂水门汀的色号与其相关试戴糊剂之间颜色匹配不可接受(ΔE>3.3),陶瓷修复体可能在美学上失败。