Suppr超能文献

酒精与能量饮料混合饮用对客观及主观醉酒状态的影响:一项荷兰场所内研究的结果

Effects of mixing alcohol with energy drink on objective and subjective intoxication: results from a Dutch on-premise study.

作者信息

Verster J C, Benjaminsen J M E, van Lanen J H M, van Stavel N M D, Olivier B

机构信息

Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Mar;232(5):835-42. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3715-y. Epub 2014 Aug 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this on-premise study was to determine if alcohol mixed with energy drink (AMED) consumption masks the subjective feelings of intoxication when compared to consuming alcohol only.

METHODS

The study was conducted on five nights in the city center of Utrecht. N = 997 people leaving bars were interviewed about their alcohol consumption with and without energy drinks, for that particular evening and for other occasions. People reporting drug and medication use were excluded (N = 84). Subjective intoxication was rated on a 10-point scale. Objective intoxication (breath alcohol concentration, BrAC) was determined with a breath alcohol test. Three groups were identified: (1) the AMED-tonight group (N = 185, 20.2 %), (2) the AMED-other-nights group (N = 246, 27.1 %), and (3) the no-AMED group (N = 482, 52.7 %).

RESULTS

Objective intoxication (BrAC) did not significantly differ (p = 0.94) between the AMED-tonight group (0.074 % ± 0.05), AMED-other-nights group (0.073 % ± 0.05), and the no-AMED group (0.074 % ± 0.05). In line, subjective intoxication was not significantly different (p = 0.96) between the AMED-tonight group (4.5 ± 2.2), AMED-other-nights group (4.6 ± 2.3), and no-AMED group (4.6 ± 2.2). Within-subjects comparisons revealed no significant differences in total alcohol consumption between AMED occasions and alcohol only occasions. Regression analyses showed that "gender" (beta = 0.078, p = 0.016), "time of testing" (beta = 0.085, p = 0.009,) and "BrAC" (beta = 0.574, p = 0.0001) together explained 37.7 % of variance of subjective intoxication scores (Cohen's f (2) = 0.605). Whether or not subjects consumed energy drinks did not predict subjective intoxication scores.

CONCLUSION

The data suggests that mixing alcohol with energy drink does not mask subjective intoxication.

摘要

背景

这项现场研究的目的是确定与仅饮酒相比,饮用酒精与能量饮料的混合物(AMED)是否会掩盖醉酒的主观感受。

方法

该研究在乌得勒支市中心的五个晚上进行。对997名离开酒吧的人进行了访谈,询问他们在那个特定夜晚以及其他场合饮酒时是否饮用了能量饮料。报告使用毒品和药物的人被排除在外(N = 84)。主观醉酒程度用10分制进行评分。通过呼气酒精测试确定客观醉酒程度(呼气酒精浓度,BrAC)。确定了三组:(1)今晚饮用AMED组(N = 185,20.2%),(2)其他夜晚饮用AMED组(N = 246,27.1%),以及(3)未饮用AMED组(N = 482,52.7%)。

结果

今晚饮用AMED组(0.074%±0.05)、其他夜晚饮用AMED组(0.073%±0.05)和未饮用AMED组(0.074%±0.05)之间的客观醉酒程度(BrAC)没有显著差异(p = 0.94)。同样,今晚饮用AMED组(4.5±2.2)、其他夜晚饮用AMED组(4.6±2.3)和未饮用AMED组(4.6±2.2)之间的主观醉酒程度没有显著差异(p = 0.96)。受试者内部比较显示,饮用AMED的场合与仅饮酒的场合之间的总酒精消费量没有显著差异。回归分析表明,“性别”(β = 0.078,p = 0.016)、“测试时间”(β = 0.085,p = 0.009)和“BrAC”(β = 0.574,p = 0.0001)共同解释了主观醉酒评分方差的37.7%(科恩f(2)= 0.605)。受试者是否饮用能量饮料并不能预测主观醉酒评分。

结论

数据表明,将酒精与能量饮料混合不会掩盖主观醉酒感受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7660/4325184/eb5ac551ec33/213_2014_3715_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验