Verster Joris C, Benson Sarah, Johnson Sean J, Alford Chris, Godefroy Samuel Benrejeb, Scholey Andrew
Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2018 Mar;33(2):e2650. doi: 10.1002/hup.2650. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to critically review the (1) prevalence of alcohol mixed with energy drink (AMED) consumption, (2) motives for AMED consumption, (3) correlates of AMED consumption, and (4) whether AMED consumption has an impact on (a) alcohol consumption, (b) subjective intoxication, and (c) risk-taking behavior. Overall a minority of the population consumes AMED, typically infrequently. Motives for AMED consumption are predominantly hedonistic and social. Meta-analyses revealed that AMED consumers drink significantly more alcohol than alcohol-only (AO) consumers. Within-subject comparisons restricted to AMED consumers revealed that alcohol consumption does not significantly differ between typical AMED and AO occasions. On past month heaviest drinking occasions, AMED users consume significantly less alcohol on AMED occasions when compared to AO occasions. AMED consumers experience significantly fewer negative consequences and risk-taking behavior on AMED occasions compared with AO occasions. Meta-analyses of subjective intoxication studies suggest that AMED consumption does not differentially affect subjective intoxication when compared to AO consumption. In conclusion, when compared to AO consumption, mixing alcohol with energy drink does not affect subjective intoxication and seems unlikely to increase total alcohol consumption, associated risk-taking behavior, nor other negative alcohol-related consequences. Further research may be necessary to fully reveal the effects of AMED.
(1)酒精与能量饮料混合饮用(AMED)的流行率;(2)AMED饮用的动机;(3)AMED饮用的相关因素;以及(4)AMED饮用是否对以下方面有影响:(a)酒精消费;(b)主观醉酒感;(c)冒险行为。总体而言,少数人群饮用AMED,且通常不频繁。AMED饮用的动机主要是享乐主义和社交性的。荟萃分析表明,AMED消费者比仅饮酒(AO)的消费者饮用的酒精量显著更多。在仅针对AMED消费者的受试者内比较显示,在典型的AMED饮用场合和AO饮用场合之间,酒精消费量没有显著差异。在过去一个月饮酒量最大的场合,与AO场合相比,AMED使用者在AMED场合饮用的酒精量显著更少。与AO场合相比,AMED消费者在AMED场合经历的负面后果和冒险行为显著更少。对主观醉酒感研究的荟萃分析表明,与AO饮用相比,AMED饮用对主观醉酒感没有差异影响。总之,与AO饮用相比,酒精与能量饮料混合饮用不会影响主观醉酒感,似乎也不太可能增加总酒精消费量、相关的冒险行为或其他与酒精相关的负面后果。可能需要进一步的研究来充分揭示AMED的影响。