School of Medicine (Psychology), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.
School of Medicine (Psychology), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia; National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Nov 1;180:292-303. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
We report a series of studies examining the effect of alcohol mixed with energy drinks (AmEDs) versus alcohol on objective intoxication (breath alcohol concentration; BrAC), intensity, and nature of intoxication. We also aimed to disentangle the role of energy drink (ED) ingredients in any effects.
Three within-subject double-blind placebo-controlled studies measured BrAC, subjective intoxication and impairment ('intensity of intoxication'), stimulation and sedation ('nature of intoxication') following administration of ED, Cola, Caffeine+Sugar, and Placebo with alcohol (Study 1, n=18); ED, Caffeine-only, Sugar-only and Placebo with alcohol (Study 2, n=20); and ED and Placebo with alcohol (Study 3, n=27).
Significant moderate-to-large magnitude BrAC decrements and delayed time to peak BrAC were observed after ED administration versus Placebo. However, no meaningful BrAC differences between ED and other active conditions were observed in Study 1 and 2. After BrAC adjustment, moderate-to-large magnitude reductions in intoxication and impairment ratings were observed after ED versus Placebo on the ascending limb in all studies and at peak in Study 2 and 3. No meaningful differences were observed in intoxication and impairment ratings between ED and Caffeine+Sugar and Cola conditions (Study 1); ratings were lower after ED versus Sugar-only (Study 2). Stimulation and sedation ratings did not differ between ED and Placebo.
Reductions in objective intoxication and perceived intensity of intoxication, but not nature of intoxication, were observed after AmED consumption. However, effects may be common to alcohol mixers containing sugars (objective intoxication) and caffeine (intensity of intoxication) and specific to a laboratory setting.
我们报告了一系列研究,旨在考察酒精混合能量饮料(AmEDs)与酒精对客观醉酒(呼气酒精浓度;BrAC)、醉酒强度和醉酒性质的影响。我们还旨在厘清能量饮料(ED)成分在任何影响中的作用。
三项在体双盲安慰剂对照研究在摄入 ED、可乐、咖啡因+糖和安慰剂与酒精后,测量了 BrAC、主观醉酒和醉酒程度(“醉酒强度”)、兴奋和镇静(“醉酒性质”),研究 1(n=18)中包括 ED、咖啡因仅、糖仅和安慰剂与酒精;研究 2(n=20)中包括 ED、咖啡因仅、糖仅和安慰剂与酒精;研究 3(n=27)中包括 ED 和安慰剂与酒精。
与安慰剂相比,ED 给药后观察到中等至较大幅度的 BrAC 降低和峰值 BrAC 延迟。然而,在研究 1 和 2 中,ED 与其他活性条件之间未观察到有意义的 BrAC 差异。在 BrAC 调整后,所有研究在上升支上和研究 2 和 3 的峰值时,与安慰剂相比,ED 后观察到中等至较大幅度的醉酒和醉酒程度评分降低。在研究 1 中,ED 与咖啡因+糖和可乐条件之间未观察到醉酒和醉酒程度评分的有意义差异;在研究 2 中,ED 后评分低于糖仅组。在 ED 和安慰剂之间,兴奋和镇静评分没有差异。
在摄入 AmED 后,观察到客观醉酒和感知醉酒强度的降低,但醉酒性质没有降低。然而,这些影响可能与含有糖(客观醉酒)和咖啡因(醉酒强度)的酒精混合剂共同存在,并且特定于实验室环境。