Suppr超能文献

针对重度抑郁症的第三代认知疗法与基于心理化的治疗:一项随机临床试验。

Third-wave cognitive therapy versus mentalisation-based treatment for major depressive disorder: a randomised clinical trial.

作者信息

Jakobsen Janus Christian, Gluud Christian, Kongerslev Mickey, Larsen Kirsten Aaskov, Sørensen Per, Winkel Per, Lange Theis, Søgaard Ulf, Simonsen Erik

机构信息

Psychiatric Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 19;4(8):e004903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004903.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the benefits and harms of third-wave cognitive therapy versus mentalisation-based therapy in a small sample of depressed participants.

SETTING

The trial was conducted at an outpatient psychiatric clinic for non-psychotic patients in Roskilde, Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

44 consecutive adult participants diagnosed with major depressive disorder.

INTERVENTIONS

18 weeks of third-wave cognitive therapy (n=22) versus 18 weeks of mentalisation-based treatment (n=22).

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) at end of treatment (18 weeks). Secondary outcomes were: remission (HDRS <8), Beck's Depression Inventory, Symptom Checklist 90 Revised and The WHO-Five Well-being Index 1999.

RESULTS

The trial inclusion lasted for about 2 years as planned but only 44 out of the planned 84 participants were randomised. Two mentalisation-based participants were lost to follow-up. The unadjusted analysis showed that third-wave participants compared with mentalisation-based participants did not differ significantly regarding the 18 weeks HDRS score (12.9 vs 17.0; mean difference -4.14; 95% CI -8.30 to 0.03; p=0.051). In the analysis adjusted for baseline HDRS score, the difference was favouring third-wave cognitive therapy (p=0.039). At 18 weeks, five of the third-wave participants (22.7%) were in remission versus none of the mentalisation-based participants (p=0.049). We recorded no suicide attempts or suicides during the intervention period in any of the 44 participants. No significant differences were found between the two intervention groups on the remaining secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Third-wave cognitive therapy may be more effective than mentalisation-based therapy for depressive symptoms measured on the HDRS. However, more randomised clinical trials are needed to assess the effects of third-wave cognitive therapy and mentalisation-based treatment for depression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Registered with Clinical Trials government identifier: NCT01070134.

摘要

目的

在一小部分抑郁症患者样本中比较第三代认知疗法与基于心理化的疗法的利弊。

设置

该试验在丹麦罗斯基勒一家针对非精神病患者的门诊精神科诊所进行。

参与者

44名连续的被诊断为重度抑郁症的成年参与者。

干预措施

18周的第三代认知疗法(n = 22)与18周的基于心理化的治疗(n = 22)。

结局指标

主要结局指标是治疗结束时(18周)的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)。次要结局指标包括:缓解(HDRS <8)、贝克抑郁量表、症状自评量表90修订版和1999年世界卫生组织五福安康指数。

结果

试验纳入按计划持续了约2年,但计划的84名参与者中只有44名被随机分组。两名接受基于心理化治疗的参与者失访。未调整分析显示,与基于心理化治疗的参与者相比,第三代认知疗法参与者在18周HDRS评分上无显著差异(12.9对17.0;平均差异 -4.14;95%可信区间 -8.30至0.03;p = 0.051)。在根据基线HDRS评分进行调整的分析中,差异有利于第三代认知疗法(p = 图039)。在18周时,第三代认知疗法组中有5名参与者(22.7%)缓解,而基于心理化治疗组中无人缓解(p = 0.049)。在44名参与者的干预期间,我们记录到无自杀未遂或自杀事件。在其余次要结局指标上,两个干预组之间未发现显著差异。

结论

对于HDRS测量的抑郁症状,第三代认知疗法可能比基于心理化的疗法更有效。然而,需要更多随机临床试验来评估第三代认知疗法和基于心理化的治疗对抑郁症的效果。

试验注册号

在临床试验政府标识符注册:NCT01070134 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed02/4139625/54d7a67abbce/bmjopen2014004903f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验