• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种简短版声音接纳与行动量表(VAAS)的心理测量特性:对幻觉的第二代和第三代行为与认知疗法的启示

Psychometric Properties of Two Brief Versions of the Voices Acceptance and Action Scale (VAAS): Implications for the Second-wave and Third-wave Behavioural and Cognitive Approaches to Auditory Hallucinations.

作者信息

Brockman Robert, Kiernan Michael, Murrell Elizabeth

机构信息

Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.

University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(5):450-9. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1916. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1002/cpp.1916
PMID:25139072
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Despite a steep rise in the evidence base for third-wave cognitive and behavioural therapy approaches over the past decade, a scarcity of change measures relevant to these therapies as applied to psychosis is arguably slowing empirical progress in the area. The Voices Acceptance and Action Scale (VAAS), a measure of acceptance of voice experiences, is a notable exception. However, there are no published data on its psychometric properties outside of that provided by the scale developers. The current study explored the psychometric properties of two brief versions of the VAAS in a sample of psychotic voice hearers in a routine outpatient mental health service. Evidence from the current study suggests that both brief versions are robust measures of acceptance of voice experiences. Some limited support for the shortened VAAS-9 as being a marginally improved scale over the original brief VAAS-12 was also found. The current study found acceptance of voices to be highly related to depression, anxiety, stress and general negative affect and to predict unique variance in depression and general negative affect beyond that attributable to negative beliefs about voices and thought suppression. It was also found that acceptance was positively related to the use of reappraisal, indicating that the distinctiveness of acceptance from appraisal processes may be less pronounced in this context than what was has been reported previously. Implications for future research, as well as the practice of second-wave and third-wave cognitive and behavioural approaches to psychosis, are discussed.

KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE

Two brief versions of the VAAS instrument were found to be robust measures of acceptance of psychotic voice experiences. The construct of acceptance of voices is highly related to indices of well-being and negative appraisal processes in psychosis and appears to offer an alternative route to therapeutically addressing the toxic effects of negative beliefs about voices. The recent focus on acceptance-based techniques within cognitive and behavioural approaches to psychosis was supported.

摘要

未标注

尽管在过去十年中,第三波认知和行为疗法的证据基础急剧增加,但应用于精神病的与这些疗法相关的改变测量方法的稀缺,可能正在减缓该领域的实证进展。声音接纳与行动量表(VAAS)是一种衡量对幻听体验接纳程度的量表,是一个显著的例外。然而,除了量表开发者提供的数据外,没有关于其心理测量特性的已发表数据。本研究在一家常规门诊心理健康服务机构的精神病性幻听患者样本中,探讨了VAAS两个简短版本的心理测量特性。本研究的证据表明,两个简短版本都是对幻听体验接纳程度的可靠测量方法。还发现了一些有限的证据支持缩短后的VAAS-9比原始简短的VAAS-12略有改进。本研究发现,对幻听的接纳与抑郁、焦虑、压力和一般负面情绪高度相关,并能预测抑郁和一般负面情绪中超出因对幻听的负面信念和思维抑制所致的独特变异。还发现接纳与重新评价的使用呈正相关,这表明在这种情况下,接纳与评价过程的区别可能不如先前报道的那么明显。讨论了对未来研究以及第二波和第三波精神病认知和行为疗法实践的启示。

关键从业者信息

发现VAAS工具的两个简短版本是对精神病性幻听体验接纳程度的可靠测量方法。对幻听的接纳结构与精神病中的幸福感指标和负面评价过程高度相关,似乎为治疗性解决对幻听的负面信念的毒性影响提供了一条替代途径。支持了最近在精神病认知和行为疗法中对基于接纳的技术的关注。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of Two Brief Versions of the Voices Acceptance and Action Scale (VAAS): Implications for the Second-wave and Third-wave Behavioural and Cognitive Approaches to Auditory Hallucinations.两种简短版声音接纳与行动量表(VAAS)的心理测量特性:对幻觉的第二代和第三代行为与认知疗法的启示
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(5):450-9. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1916. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
2
The voices acceptance and action scale (VAAS): Pilot data.声音接纳与行动量表(VAAS):试点数据。
J Clin Psychol. 2007 Jun;63(6):593-606. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20366.
3
[Acceptance of "voices" in people with or without psychiatric disorders: Francophone validation of the 9-item VAAS scale].[有或无精神疾病者对“幻听”的接受度:9项VAAS量表的法语验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
4
Beliefs about voices and schemas about self and others in psychosis.精神病中关于幻听以及自我和他人的图式的信念。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2015 Mar;43(2):209-23. doi: 10.1017/S1352465813000817. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
5
Psychological flexibility and nonjudgemental acceptance in voice hearers: relationships with omnipotence and distress.幻听患者的心理灵活性与无评判性接纳:与全能感和痛苦的关系
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;48(12):1150-62. doi: 10.1177/0004867414535671. Epub 2014 May 16.
6
[Influence of resistance to voices on depression].[对幻听的抵抗对抑郁症的影响]
Encephale. 2015 Feb;41(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 May 9.
7
An Exploration of the Reliability and Validity of the Spanish Version of the 'Voice and You' (VAY): A Scale for Measuring the Relationship with Voices.《“声音与你”(VAY)西班牙语版的信效度探究:一种衡量与声音关系的量表》
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(2):183-8. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1949. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
8
Interpersonal processes and hearing voices: a study of the association between relating to voices and distress in clinical and non-clinical hearers.人际关系过程与幻听:一项关于幻听与临床和非临床聆听者的痛苦之间关联的研究。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2010 Mar;38(2):127-40. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809990506. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
9
Auditory hallucinations: a comparison of beliefs about voices in individuals with schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder.听觉幻觉:精神分裂症和边缘型人格障碍个体对声音的信念比较。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 May-Jun;20(3):239-45. doi: 10.1002/cpp.791. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
10
Experiential avoidance and appraisals of voices as predictors of voice-related distress.将对声音的经验性回避和评估作为与声音相关痛苦的预测因素。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2016 Sep;55(3):320-31. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12102. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Can we respond mindfully to distressing voices? A systematic review of evidence for engagement, acceptability, effectiveness and mechanisms of change for mindfulness-based interventions for people distressed by hearing voices.我们能否正念地回应困扰性声音?一项针对受幻听困扰人群的正念干预措施的参与度、可接受性、有效性及改变机制的证据的系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 14;6:1154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01154. eCollection 2015.