Suppr超能文献

发作性紧张型头痛急性治疗疗效的证据:口服治疗随机试验的方法学批判

Evidence for efficacy of acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache: methodological critique of randomised trials for oral treatments.

作者信息

Moore R Andrew, Derry Sheena, Wiffen Philip J, Straube Sebastian, Bendtsen Lars

机构信息

Pain Research and Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, The Churchill, Oxford, UK.

Pain Research and Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, The Churchill, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Pain. 2014 Nov;155(11):2220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Aug 17.

Abstract

The International Headache Society (IHS) provides guidance on the conduct of trials for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache (TTH), a common disorder with considerable disability. Electronic and other searches identified randomised, double-blind trials of oral drugs treating episodic TTH with moderate or severe pain at baseline, or that tested drugs at first pain onset. The aims were to review methods, quality, and outcomes reported (in particular the IHS-recommended primary efficacy parameter pain-free after 2 hours), and to assess efficacy by meta-analysis. We identified 58 reports: 55 from previous reviews and searches, 2 unpublished reports, and 1 clinical trial report with results. We included 40 reports of 55 randomised trials involving 12,143 patients. Reporting quality was generally good, with potential risk of bias from incomplete outcome reporting and small size; the 23 largest trials involved 82% of patients. Few trials reported IHS outcomes. The number needed to treat values for being pain-free at 2 hours compared with placebo were 8.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2 to 15) for paracetamol 1000 mg, 8.9 (95% CI 5.9 to 18) for ibuprofen 400mg, and 9.8 (95% CI 5.1 to 146) for ketoprofen 25mg. Lower (better) number needed to treat values were calculated for outcomes of mild or no pain at 2 hours, and patient global assessment. These were similar to values for these drugs in migraine. No other drugs had evaluable results for these patient-centred outcomes. There was no evidence that any one outcome was better than others. The evidence available for treatment efficacy is small in comparison to the size of the clinical problem.

摘要

国际头痛协会(IHS)为发作性紧张型头痛(TTH)的急性治疗试验提供指导,TTH是一种常见疾病,会导致相当严重的功能障碍。通过电子检索及其他检索方式,我们确定了针对基线时患有中度或重度疼痛的发作性TTH进行口服药物治疗的随机双盲试验,或在首次疼痛发作时对药物进行测试的试验。目的是回顾所报告的方法、质量和结果(特别是IHS推荐的主要疗效参数:2小时后无痛),并通过荟萃分析评估疗效。我们确定了58份报告:55份来自之前的综述和检索结果,2份未发表报告,以及1份有结果的临床试验报告。我们纳入了55项随机试验中的40份报告,涉及12143名患者。报告质量总体良好,但存在因结果报告不完整和样本量小而导致偏倚的潜在风险;23项规模最大的试验涉及82%的患者。很少有试验报告IHS的结果。与安慰剂相比,服用1000毫克对乙酰氨基酚2小时后无痛的需治疗人数为8.7(95%置信区间[CI]6.2至15),服用400毫克布洛芬的需治疗人数为8.9(95%CI5.9至18),服用25毫克酮洛芬的需治疗人数为9.8(95%CI5.1至146)。对于2小时时轻度疼痛或无疼痛以及患者整体评估的结果,计算出的需治疗人数较低(更好)。这些结果与这些药物在偏头痛治疗中的结果相似。对于这些以患者为中心的结果,没有其他药物有可评估的结果。没有证据表明任何一种结果比其他结果更好。与临床问题的规模相比,现有的治疗疗效证据较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验