Derry Sheena, Wiffen Philip J, Moore R Andrew
Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LE.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 13;1(1):CD011888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011888.pub2.
Tension-type headache (TTH) affects about 1 person in 5 worldwide. It is divided into infrequent episodic TTH (fewer than one headache per month), frequent episodic TTH (two to 14 headache days per month), and chronic TTH (15 headache days per month or more). Aspirin is one of a number of analgesics suggested for acute treatment of episodic TTH.
To assess the efficacy and safety of aspirin for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache (TTH) in adults compared with placebo or any active comparator.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and the Oxford Pain Relief Database from inception to September 2016, and also reference lists of relevant published studies and reviews. We sought unpublished studies by asking personal contacts and searching online clinical trial registers and manufacturers' websites.
We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (parallel-group or cross-over) using oral aspirin for symptomatic relief of an acute episode of TTH. Studies had to be prospective, with participants aged 18 years or over, and include at least 10 participants per treatment arm.
Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data. For various outcomes (predominantly those recommended by the International Headache Society (IHS)), we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and number needed to treat for one additional beneficial outcome (NNT), one additional harmful outcome (NNH), or to prevent one event (NNTp) for oral aspirin compared to placebo or an active intervention.We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table.
We included five studies enrolling adults with frequent episodic TTH; 1812 participants took medication, of which 767 were included in comparisons of aspirin 1000 mg with placebo, and 405 in comparisons of aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg with placebo. Not all of these participants provided data for outcomes of interest in this review. Four studies specified using IHS diagnostic criteria; one predated commonly recognised criteria, but described comparable characteristics and excluded migraine. All participants treated headaches of at least moderate pain intensity.None of the included studies were at low risk of bias across all domains considered, although for most studies and domains this was likely to be due to inadequate reporting rather than poor methods. We judged one study to be at high risk of bias due to small size.There were no data for aspirin at any dose for the IHS preferred outcome of being pain free at two hours, or for being pain free at any other time, and only one study provided data equivalent to having no or mild pain at two hours (very low quality evidence). Use of rescue medication was lower with aspirin 1000 mg than with placebo (2 studies, 397 participants); 14% of participants used rescue medication with aspirin 1000 mg compared with 31% with placebo (NNTp 6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.1 to 12) (low quality evidence). Two studies (397 participants) reported a Patient Global Evaluation at the end of the study; we combined the top two categories for both studies to determine the number of participants who were 'satisfied' with treatment. Aspirin 1000 mg produced more satisfied participants (55%) than did placebo (37%) (NNT 5.7, 95% CI 3.7 to 12) (very low quality evidence).Adverse events were not different between aspirin 1000 mg and placebo (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.5), or aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg and placebo (RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.8 to 2.0) (low quality evidence). Studies reported no serious adverse events.The quality of the evidence using GRADE comparing aspirin doses between 500 mg and 1000 mg with placebo was low or very low. Evidence was downgraded because of the small number of studies and events, and because the most important measures of efficacy were not reported.There were insufficient data to compare aspirin with any active comparator (paracetamol alone, paracetamol plus codeine, peppermint oil, or metamizole) at any of the doses tested.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of aspirin between 500 mg and 1000 mg provided some benefit in terms of less frequent use of rescue medication and more participants satisfied with treatment compared with placebo in adults with frequent episodic TTH who have an acute headache of moderate or severe intensity. There was no difference between a single dose of aspirin and placebo for the number of people experiencing adverse events. The amount and quality of the evidence was very limited and should be interpreted with caution.
紧张型头痛(TTH)在全球约五分之一的人群中发病。它分为偶发性紧张型头痛(每月头痛少于一次)、频发偶发性紧张型头痛(每月头痛2 - 14天)和慢性紧张型头痛(每月头痛15天及以上)。阿司匹林是推荐用于偶发性紧张型头痛急性治疗的多种镇痛药之一。
评估与安慰剂或任何活性对照药相比,阿司匹林对成人偶发性紧张型头痛(TTH)急性治疗的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase和牛津疼痛缓解数据库,检索时间从建库至2016年9月,同时检索了相关已发表研究和综述的参考文献列表。我们通过个人联系、检索在线临床试验注册库和制造商网站来查找未发表的研究。
我们纳入了使用口服阿司匹林对TTH急性发作进行症状缓解的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(平行组或交叉设计)。研究必须是前瞻性的,参与者年龄在18岁及以上,每个治疗组至少包括10名参与者。
两名综述作者独立评估研究是否纳入并提取数据。对于各种结局(主要是国际头痛协会(IHS)推荐的那些结局),我们计算了风险比(RR)以及口服阿司匹林与安慰剂或活性干预相比,获得额外一项有益结局所需治疗人数(NNT)、额外一项有害结局所需治疗人数(NNH)或预防一项事件所需治疗人数(NNTp)。我们使用GRADE评估证据并创建了“结果总结”表。
我们纳入了五项针对频发偶发性TTH成人的研究;1812名参与者服用了药物,其中767名被纳入阿司匹林1000mg与安慰剂的比较,405名被纳入阿司匹林500mg或650mg与安慰剂的比较。并非所有这些参与者都提供了本综述感兴趣结局的数据。四项研究明确使用了IHS诊断标准;一项早于普遍认可的标准,但描述了类似特征并排除了偏头痛。所有参与者治疗的头痛疼痛强度至少为中度。在所考虑的所有领域中,纳入的研究均无低偏倚风险,尽管对于大多数研究和领域,这可能是由于报告不充分而非方法不佳所致。由于样本量小,我们判定一项研究存在高偏倚风险。对于IHS的首选结局,即两小时无痛或其他任何时间无痛,没有任何剂量阿司匹林的数据,只有一项研究提供了相当于两小时无疼痛或轻度疼痛的数据(证据质量极低)。与安慰剂相比,阿司匹林1000mg组使用急救药物的比例更低(2项研究,397名参与者);14%服用阿司匹林1000mg的参与者使用了急救药物,而服用安慰剂的为31%(NNTp 6.0,95%置信区间(CI)4.1至12)(证据质量低)。两项研究(397名参与者)在研究结束时报告了患者总体评估;我们将两项研究的前两个类别合并以确定对治疗“满意”的参与者人数。阿司匹林100mg组“满意”的参与者(55%)多于安慰剂组(37%)(NNT 5.7,95% CI 3.7至12)(证据质量极低)。阿司匹林1000mg与安慰剂之间的不良事件无差异(RR 1.1,95% CI 0.8至1.5),阿司匹林500mg或650mg与安慰剂之间也无差异(RR 1.3,95% CI 0.8至2.0)(证据质量低)。研究报告无严重不良事件。使用GRADE比较500mg至1000mg阿司匹林剂量与安慰剂的证据质量低或极低。证据被降级是因为研究和事件数量少,以及未报告最重要的疗效指标。在任何测试剂量下,均无足够数据将阿司匹林与任何活性对照药(单独使用对乙酰氨基酚、对乙酰氨基酚加可待因、薄荷油或安乃近)进行比较。
对于有中度或重度急性头痛的频发偶发性TTH成人,与安慰剂相比,500mg至1000mg的单剂量阿司匹林在减少急救药物使用频率和使更多参与者对治疗满意方面有一定益处。单剂量阿司匹林与安慰剂在不良事件发生人数上无差异。证据的数量和质量非常有限,应谨慎解读。