Moreira Xoaquín, Abdala-Roberts Luis, Parra-Tabla Víctor, Mooney Kailen A
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Departamento de Ecología Tropical, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 20;9(8):e105438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105438. eCollection 2014.
Despite increasing evidence that plant intra- and inter-specific diversity increases primary productivity, and that such effect may in turn cascade up to influence herbivores, there is little information about plant diversity effects on plant anti-herbivore defenses, the relative importance of different sources of plant diversity, and the mechanisms for such effects. For example, increased plant growth at high diversity may lead to reduced investment in defenses via growth-defense trade-offs. Alternatively, positive effects of plant diversity on plant growth may lead to increased herbivore abundance which in turn leads to a greater investment in plant defenses. The magnitude of trait variation underlying diversity effects is usually greater among species than among genotypes within a given species, so plant species diversity effects on resource use by producers as well as on higher trophic levels should be stronger than genotypic diversity effects. Here we compared the relative importance of plant genotypic and species diversity on anti-herbivore defenses and whether such effects are mediated indirectly via diversity effects on plant growth and/or herbivore damage. To this end, we performed a large-scale field experiment where we manipulated genotypic diversity of big-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) and tree species diversity, and measured effects on mahogany growth, damage by the stem-boring specialist caterpillar Hypsipyla grandella, and defensive traits (polyphenolics and condensed tannins in stem and leaves). We found that both forms of plant diversity had positive effects on stem (but not leaf) defenses. However, neither source of diversity influenced mahogany growth, and diversity effects on defenses were not mediated by either growth-defense trade-offs or changes in stem-borer damage. Although the mechanism(s) of diversity effects on plant defenses are yet to be determined, our study is one of the few to test for and show producer diversity effects on plant chemical defenses.
尽管越来越多的证据表明植物种内和种间多样性会提高初级生产力,且这种效应可能进而层层递进影响食草动物,但关于植物多样性对植物抗食草动物防御的影响、植物多样性不同来源的相对重要性以及这种影响的机制,我们所知甚少。例如,在高多样性条件下植物生长增加可能会通过生长 - 防御权衡导致对防御的投资减少。或者,植物多样性对植物生长的积极影响可能会导致食草动物数量增加,进而导致对植物防御的更大投资。在给定物种中,多样性效应背后的性状变异幅度通常在物种间比在基因型间更大,因此植物物种多样性对生产者资源利用以及更高营养级的影响应该比基因型多样性的影响更强。在这里,我们比较了植物基因型和物种多样性对植物抗食草动物防御的相对重要性,以及这种影响是否通过对植物生长和/或食草动物损害的多样性效应间接介导。为此,我们进行了一项大规模田间实验,在实验中我们控制大叶桃花心木(Swietenia macrophylla)的基因型多样性和树种多样性,并测量对桃花心木生长、蛀干专食性毛虫大痣小卷蛾(Hypsipyla grandella)造成的损害以及防御性状(茎和叶中的多酚和缩合单宁)的影响。我们发现这两种植物多样性形式对茎(而非叶)防御都有积极影响。然而,两种多样性来源都未影响桃花心木的生长,并且对防御的多样性效应既不是由生长 - 防御权衡介导的,也不是由蛀干害虫损害的变化介导的。尽管多样性对植物防御的影响机制尚待确定,但我们的研究是少数测试并显示生产者多样性对植物化学防御有影响的研究之一。