Agresta C, Slobodinsky M, Tucker C
Department of Physical Therapy, Temple University, Philadelphia, United States.
Int J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;35(14):1203-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382055. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
Recreational runners have an estimated overuse injury incidence rate of up to 79% and 90% for marathoners. A pre-participation screening tool that can identify risk for injury may help reduce overuse injury in runners. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS(TM)) is a reliable clinical tool used with athletes to help predict injury. To date, the FMS(TM) has not been used with endurance athletes. The purpose of this article is to establish normative FMS(TM) values for distance runners. 45 healthy runners performed the FMS(TM). Descriptive statistics were calculated; independent t-tests were performed to examine the effect of gender, experience and injury on scores. A Chi-square test was used to evaluate whether significant differences in scores exist for any component of the FMS(TM). The mean FMS(TM) score was 13.13±1.8. No significant differences in FMS(TM) scores were found between novice and experienced runners (p=0.71) or runners with a history of injury and those without (p=0.20). While male and female runners did not differ significantly in their total FMS(TM) score (p=0.65), significant differences were found in the deep squat (p<0.05), trunk stability push-up (p<0.001) and active straight leg raise components (p=0.002). This study provides normative values for FMS(TM) scores when testing uninjured distance runners.
据估计,普通跑步者的过度使用损伤发生率高达79%,而马拉松运动员的这一比例为90%。一种能够识别损伤风险的参与前筛查工具可能有助于减少跑步者的过度使用损伤。功能性动作筛查(FMS™)是一种用于运动员的可靠临床工具,有助于预测损伤。迄今为止,FMS™尚未用于耐力运动员。本文的目的是确定长跑运动员的FMS™标准值。45名健康的跑步者进行了FMS™测试。计算了描述性统计数据;进行独立t检验以检查性别、经验和损伤对得分的影响。使用卡方检验来评估FMS™的任何组成部分在得分上是否存在显著差异。FMS™的平均得分为13.13±1.8。新手和有经验的跑步者之间(p=0.71)或有损伤史和无损伤史的跑步者之间(p=0.20)在FMS™得分上未发现显著差异。虽然男性和女性跑步者的FMS™总分没有显著差异(p=0.65),但在深蹲(p<0.05)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑(p<0.001)和主动直腿抬高项目(p=0.002)上发现了显著差异。本研究为测试未受伤的长跑运动员时的FMS™得分提供了标准值。