Chimera Nicole J, Smith Craig A, Warren Meghan
Department of Athletic Training, Daemen College, Amherst, NY;
J Athl Train. 2015 May;50(5):475-85. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.6.02. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Research is limited regarding the effects of injury or surgery history and sex on the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and Y Balance Test (YBT).
To determine if injury or surgery history or sex affected results on the FMS and YBT.
Cross-sectional study.
Athletic training facilities.
A total of 200 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I female (n = 92; age = 20.0 ± 1.4 years, body mass index = 22.8 ± 3.1 kg/m(2)) and male (n = 108; age = 20.0 ± 1.5 years, body mass index = 27.0 ± 4.6 kg/m(2)) athletes were screened; 170 completed the FMS, and 190 completed the YBT.
INTERVENTION(S): A self-reported questionnaire identified injury or surgery history and sex. The FMS assessed movement during the patterns of deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, impingement-clearing test, straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, press-up clearing test, rotary stability, and posterior-rocking clearing test. The YBT assessed balance while participants reached in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The FMS composite score (CS; range, 0-21) and movement pattern score (range, 0-3), the YBT CS (% lower extremity length), and YBT anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral asymmetry (difference between limbs in centimeters). Independent-samples t tests established differences in mean FMS CS, YBT CS, and YBT asymmetry. The Mann-Whitney U test identified differences in FMS movement patterns.
We found lower overall FMS CSs for the following injuries or surgeries: hip (injured = 12.7 ± 3.1, uninjured = 14.4 ± 2.3; P = .005), elbow (injured = 12.1 ± 2.8, uninjured = 14.3 ± 2.4; P = .02), and hand (injured = 12.3 ± 2.9, uninjured = 14.3 ± 2.3; P = .006) injuries and shoulder surgery (surgery = 12.0 ± 1.0, no surgery = 14.3 ± 2.4; P < .001). We observed worse FMS movement pattern performance for knee surgery (rotary stability: P = .03), hip injury (deep squat and hurdle: P < .042 for both), hip surgery (hurdle and lunge: P < .01 for both), shoulder injury (shoulder and hand injury: P < .02 for both), and shoulder surgery (shoulder: P < .02). We found better FMS movement pattern performance for trunk/back injury (deep squat: P = .02) and ankle injury (lunge: P = .01). Female athletes performed worse in FMS movement patterns for trunk (P < .001) and rotary (P = .01) stability but better in the lunge (P = .008), shoulder mobility (P < .001), and straight-leg raise (P < .001). Anterior asymmetry was greater for male athletes (P = .02).
Injury history and sex affected FMS and YBT performance. Researchers should consider adjusting for confounders.
关于损伤或手术史以及性别对功能性动作筛查(FMS)和Y平衡测试(YBT)的影响,相关研究有限。
确定损伤或手术史以及性别是否会影响FMS和YBT的测试结果。
横断面研究。
运动训练设施。
总共200名美国国家大学体育协会第一分区的女性(n = 92;年龄 = 20.0 ± 1.4岁,体重指数 = 22.8 ± 3.1 kg/m²)和男性(n = 108;年龄 = 20.0 ± 1.5岁,体重指数 = 27.0 ± 4.6 kg/m²)运动员接受了筛查;170人完成了FMS测试,190人完成了YBT测试。
通过一份自我报告问卷确定损伤或手术史以及性别。FMS评估了深蹲、跨栏步、直线弓步蹲、肩部活动度、撞击清除测试、直腿抬高、躯干稳定性俯卧撑、俯卧撑清除测试、旋转稳定性和后摇清除测试等动作模式下的运动情况。YBT评估了参与者向前、后内侧和后外侧方向伸展时的平衡能力。
FMS综合评分(CS;范围为0 - 21)和动作模式评分(范围为0 - 3)、YBT综合评分(%下肢长度)以及YBT前侧、后内侧和后外侧不对称性(两下肢之间以厘米为单位的差异)。独立样本t检验确定了FMS综合评分、YBT综合评分和YBT不对称性的均值差异。曼-惠特尼U检验确定了FMS动作模式的差异。
我们发现,以下损伤或手术的FMS总体综合评分较低:髋部损伤(受伤 = 12.7 ± 3.1,未受伤 = 14.4 ± 2.3;P = 0.005)、肘部损伤(受伤 = 12.1 ± 2.8,未受伤 = 14.3 ± 2.4;P = 0.02)、手部损伤(受伤 = 12.3 ± 2.9,未受伤 = 14.3 ± 2.3;P = 0.006)以及肩部手术(手术 = 12.0 ± 1.0,未手术 = 14.3 ± 2.4;P < 0.001)。我们观察到,膝关节手术(旋转稳定性:P = 0.03)、髋部损伤(深蹲和跨栏步:两者P < 0.042)、髋部手术(跨栏步和弓步蹲:两者P < 0.01)、肩部损伤(肩部和手部损伤:两者P < 0.02)以及肩部手术(肩部:P < 0.02)的FMS动作模式表现较差。我们发现,躯干/背部损伤(深蹲:P = 0.02)和脚踝损伤(弓步蹲:P = 0.01)的FMS动作模式表现较好。女性运动员在FMS动作模式的躯干(P < 0.001)和旋转(P = 0.01)稳定性方面表现较差,但在弓步蹲(P = 0.008)、肩部活动度(P < 0.001)和直腿抬高(P < 0.001)方面表现较好。男性运动员的前侧不对称性更大(P = 0.02)。
损伤史和性别会影响FMS和YBT的表现。研究人员应考虑对混杂因素进行校正。