Schwingshackl Lukas, Missbach Benjamin, König Jürgen, Hoffmann Georg
University of Vienna, Faculty of Life Sciences,Department of Nutritional Sciences,Althanstraße 14 UZA II,A-1090 Vienna,Austria.
Public Health Nutr. 2015 May;18(7):1292-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001542. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
Adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with significant improvements in health status. However, to date no systematic review and meta-analysis has summarized the effects of Mediterranean diet adherence on the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Electronic searches for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were performed in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE and the Cochrane Trial Register until 2 April 2014. Pooled effects were calculated by an inverse-variance random-effect meta-analysis using the statistical software Review Manager 5.2 by the Cochrane Collaboration.
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.
19+years of age.
One randomized controlled trial and eight prospective cohort studies (122 810 subjects) published between 2007 and 2014 were included for meta-analysis. For highest v. lowest adherence to the Mediterranean diet score, the pooled risk ratio was 0.81 (95 % CI 0.73, 0.90, P<0.0001, I 2=55 %). Sensitivity analysis including only long-term studies confirmed the results of the primary analysis (pooled risk ratio=0.75; 95 % CI 0.68, 0.83, P<0.00001, I 2=0 %). The Egger regression test provided no evidence of substantial publication bias (P=0.254).
Greater adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of diabetes (19 %; moderate quality evidence). These results seem to be clinically relevant for public health, in particular for encouraging a Mediterranean-like dietary pattern for primary prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
坚持地中海饮食与健康状况的显著改善相关。然而,迄今为止,尚无系统评价和荟萃分析总结坚持地中海饮食对2型糖尿病风险的影响。
截至2014年4月2日,在MEDLINE、SCOPUS、EMBASE和Cochrane试验注册库中对随机对照试验和队列研究进行电子检索。使用Cochrane协作网的统计软件Review Manager 5.2,通过逆方差随机效应荟萃分析计算合并效应。
随机对照试验和队列研究的荟萃分析。
年龄≥19岁。
纳入一项随机对照试验和八项前瞻性队列研究(122810名受试者)进行荟萃分析,这些研究发表于2007年至2014年之间。对于地中海饮食评分最高与最低的依从性相比,合并风险比为0.81(95%CI 0.73, 0.90,P<0.0001,I²=55%)。仅纳入长期研究的敏感性分析证实了主要分析的结果(合并风险比=0.75;95%CI 0.68, 0.83,P<0.00001,I²=0%)。Egger回归检验未提供显著发表偏倚的证据(P=0.254)。
更高程度地坚持地中海饮食与糖尿病风险显著降低相关(19%;中等质量证据)。这些结果似乎对公共卫生具有临床意义,特别是对于鼓励采用类似地中海的饮食模式来进行2型糖尿病的一级预防。