Suppr超能文献

新型口服抗凝剂治疗急性静脉血栓栓塞症——一项间接比较的系统评价

New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism - a systematic review with indirect comparisons.

作者信息

Hirschl Mirko, Kundi Michael

机构信息

Department of Angiology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Institute of Environmental Health Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Vasa. 2014 Sep;43(5):353-64. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000373.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For decades, heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the gold standards in therapy of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The advent of factor IIa and Xa inhibitors provides new therapeutic options. The aim of this analysis is to compare the currently available new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with VKAs and also indirectly the NOACs with each other, as it is unlikely that a head-to-head comparison will ever be available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 27,024 patients were included in the RE-COVER, RE-COVER II, EINSTEIN DVT and PE, AMPLIFY and HOKUSAI studies with 13,511 in the VKA arm and 13,513 in the NOAC arm. Efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed by relative risks (RR) and absolute risk reductions (ARR) relative to VKA. The indirect comparison between the NOACs was performed according to ISPOR guidelines.

RESULTS

No differences between NOACs and VKA were found regarding recurrent VTE and death. Bleeding was significantly reduced by NOACs: major bleeding by rivaroxaban (RR 0.55; 0.38 - 0.81) and apixaban (RR 0.31; 0.17 - 0.55); major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding by dabigatran (RR 0.63; 0.51 - 0.77), apixaban (RR 0.44; 0.36 - 0.55) and edoxaban (RR 0.81; 0.71 - 0.93). The ARR for major bleeding was 1 % for rivaroxaban and apixaban; and for the composite bleeding endpoint 3.2 % for dabigatran, 5.4 % for apixaban, and 1.9 % for edoxaban. Regarding efficacy, no differences were found between NOACs. Apixaban reduced incidence of major bleeding more than dabigatran and edoxaban. Regarding occurrence of the composite bleeding endpoint, apixaban performed better than all other NOACs and dabigatran better than rivaroxaban and edoxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

NOACs are as efficient in the treatment of VTE as VKA but with reduced risk of bleeding complications. Indirect comparisons indicate differences in the risk of clinically relevant bleeding events. Important issues such as monitoring and reversal of anticoagulation are still unresolved, but introduction of NOACs increased the therapeutic spectrum and thereby the potential for individualized therapy.

摘要

背景

几十年来,肝素和维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)一直是静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)治疗的金标准。凝血因子IIa和Xa抑制剂的出现提供了新的治疗选择。本分析的目的是将目前可用的新型口服抗凝药(NOAC)与VKA进行比较,并间接比较不同的NOAC,因为不太可能进行直接的头对头比较。

患者和方法

RE-COVER、RE-COVER II、EINSTEIN DVT和PE、AMPLIFY以及HOKUSAI研究共纳入27,024例患者,其中VKA组13,511例,NOAC组13,513例。通过相对于VKA的相对风险(RR)和绝对风险降低率(ARR)评估疗效和安全性终点。根据药物经济学与药品疗效研究协会(ISPOR)指南对NOAC进行间接比较。

结果

在复发性VTE和死亡方面,未发现NOAC与VKA之间存在差异。NOAC显著降低了出血风险:利伐沙班使大出血风险降低(RR 0.55;0.38 - 0.81),阿哌沙班使大出血风险降低(RR 0.31;0.17 - 0.55);达比加群使大出血和临床相关非大出血风险降低(RR 0.63;0.51 - 0.77),阿哌沙班使大出血和临床相关非大出血风险降低(RR 0.44;0.36 - 0.55),依度沙班使大出血和临床相关非大出血风险降低(RR 0.81;0.71 - 0.93)。利伐沙班和阿哌沙班大出血的ARR为1%;达比加群复合出血终点的ARR为3.2%,阿哌沙班为5.4%,依度沙班为1.9%。在疗效方面,未发现不同NOAC之间存在差异。阿哌沙班比达比加群和依度沙班更能降低大出血的发生率。在复合出血终点的发生情况方面,阿哌沙班的表现优于所有其他NOAC,达比加群优于利伐沙班和依度沙班。

结论

NOAC在治疗VTE方面与VKA一样有效,但出血并发症风险降低。间接比较表明在临床相关出血事件风险方面存在差异。抗凝监测和逆转等重要问题仍未解决,但NOAC的引入拓宽了治疗范围,从而增加了个体化治疗的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验