Suppr超能文献

非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药治疗静脉血栓栓塞症的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhuang Yan, Dai Lin-Feng, Chen Ming-Qi

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029 China.

出版信息

JRSM Open. 2021 Jun 13;12(6):20542704211010686. doi: 10.1177/20542704211010686. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several trials had compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin for acute venous thromboembolism, but the results were incomplete. This updated review comprehensively assessed the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Six databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2018.

SETTING

Adult patients had got non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or warfarin for venous thromboembolism.

PARTICIPANTS

Randomised control trials that compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants .

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 29,879 cases were included, among which 14,943 cases were assigned to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group and 14,936 cases to warfarin group. Meta-analysis showed that compared with warfarin, recurrent venous thromboembolism (odds ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.11]), death related to venous thromboembolism or fatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.00 [95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.60]), symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (odds ratio 0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.09]), symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.03 [(95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.30]) and all deaths (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.12]) are similar in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group, but major bleeding event (odds ratio 0.61 [95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.75]) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding event (odds ratio [95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.85]) are less in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group. .

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of venous thromboembolism, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is as effective as warfarin, and has a better safety profile than warfarin.

摘要

目的

多项试验比较了非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药与华法林治疗急性静脉血栓栓塞症的疗效和安全性,但结果并不完整。本更新综述全面评估了非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药治疗静脉血栓栓塞症的疗效和安全性。

设计

随机对照试验的荟萃分析。检索了2000年1月至2018年12月的六个数据库。

背景

成年患者接受非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药或华法林治疗静脉血栓栓塞症。

参与者

比较非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药与华法林疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。

主要观察指标

非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药的疗效和安全性。

结果

纳入7项研究,共29879例患者,其中14943例被分配至非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药组,14936例被分配至华法林组。荟萃分析显示,与华法林相比,非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药组的复发性静脉血栓栓塞(比值比0.94[95%置信区间0.81至1.11])、与静脉血栓栓塞相关的死亡或致命性肺栓塞(比值比1.00[95%置信区间0.63至1.60])、有症状的深静脉血栓形成(比值比0.88[95%置信区间0.72至1.09])、有症状的非致命性肺栓塞(比值比1.03[95%置信区间0.82至1.30])和所有死亡(比值比0.92[95%置信区间0.76至1.12])相似,但主要出血事件(比值比0.61[95%置信区间0.50至0.75])和临床相关非主要出血事件(比值比[95%置信区间0.53至0.85])在非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药组较少。

结论

对于静脉血栓栓塞症的治疗,非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药与华法林疗效相当,且安全性优于华法林。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fb6/8207293/b7b430ab85d5/10.1177_20542704211010686-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验