Suppr超能文献

两种单根管系统Wave One和One Shape促进细菌清除。

Bacterial removal promoted by 2 single-file systems: Wave One and One Shape.

作者信息

Nabeshima Cleber Keiti, Caballero-Flores Hector, Cai Silvana, Aranguren José, Borges Britto Maria Leticia, Machado Manoel Eduardo de Lima

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):1995-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.024. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Different single-file systems are available for endodontic treatment; however, comparative studies are scarce. Thus, the present study evaluated bacterial reduction promoted by 2 single-file systems: Wave One (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and One Shape (Micromega, Besancon, France).

METHODS

Forty-five distobuccal root canals of upper molars sterilized with ethylene oxide were infected with Enterococcus faecalis for 21 days, and then root canal initial bacterial sample was collected with paper cones and plated on M-enterococcus agar. The specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups according to instrumentation (n = 15): Wave One, One Shape, and the crown-down manual technique (control group). The other 6 specimens without contamination were control asepsis. After instrumentation, samples were collected with the use of scraping and paper cones. The bacterial reduction was calculated, and then intragroup analysis was performed using the paired t test and intergroup analysis using analysis of variance (both at 5% significance).

RESULTS

All techniques significantly reduced the number of bacteria in the root canal (P < .05), with no significant difference between them (P > .05). The aseptic control group did not show any bacterial growth.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that the single-file systems Wave One and One Shape significantly reduce the bacterial number in the root canal and that there is no significant difference in their bacterial reduction abilities.

摘要

引言

目前有不同的单根管系统可用于根管治疗;然而,相关的比较研究较少。因此,本研究评估了两种单根管系统——Wave One(登士柏迈丽菲,瑞士巴拉格)和One Shape(迈科美加,法国贝桑松)——对细菌的清除效果。

方法

45颗经环氧乙烷灭菌的上颌磨牙远中颊根根管,用粪肠球菌感染21天,然后用纸尖收集根管初始细菌样本,接种于M-肠球菌琼脂培养基上。根据器械操作方法将标本随机分为3组(每组n = 15):Wave One组、One Shape组和冠向下手动技术组(对照组)。另外6个未受污染的标本作为无菌对照组。器械操作后,用刮匙和纸尖收集样本。计算细菌减少量,然后使用配对t检验进行组内分析,使用方差分析进行组间分析(均以5%为显著性水平)。

结果

所有技术均显著减少了根管内的细菌数量(P < 0.05),但它们之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。无菌对照组未显示任何细菌生长。

结论

可以得出结论,Wave One和One Shape这两种单根管系统均能显著减少根管内的细菌数量,且它们的细菌清除能力无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验