• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Antibacterial Efficacy of Rotary and Reciprocating Instrumentation Techniques.旋转和往复式器械操作技术的抗菌效果
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Sep;58(3):245-254. doi: 10.15644/asc58/3/5.
2
One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study.一次性与两次性根管治疗术治疗根尖周炎患牙的疗效比较:一项组织细菌学研究。
J Endod. 2012 Aug;38(8):1040-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
3
Comparation of the effectiveness of conventional needle irrigation and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming with sodium hypochorite in the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial.传统针管冲洗与光致光声流联合次氯酸钠治疗根尖周炎牙齿的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 2;24(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04055-6.
4
Evaluation of filling material remnants after basic preparation, apical enlargement and final irrigation in retreatment of severely curved root canals in extracted teeth.评价在严重弯曲根管再治疗中基本预备、根尖扩大和最终冲洗后根管内的充填材料残留。
Int Endod J. 2020 Jul;53(7):962-973. doi: 10.1111/iej.13287. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
5
Comparison of final disinfection protocols using antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and different irrigants after single-file reciprocating instrumentation against intracanal bacterial biofilm - An in vitro study.比较单根镍钛器械在不同冲洗液冲洗后应用抗菌光动力疗法对根管内细菌生物膜的最终消毒效果:一项体外研究。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2018 Dec;24:153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.使用扫描电子显微镜对手动与旋转ProTaper技术联合制备的根管壁上的玷污层和碎屑进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):574-81.
7
Efficacy of 3D conforming nickel titanium rotary instruments in eliminating canal wall bacteria from oval-shaped root canals.三维适形镍钛旋转器械清除椭圆形根管管壁细菌的疗效
J Dent. 2015 May;43(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
8
Comparison of antibacterial effectiveness of three rotary file system with different geometry in infected root canals before and after instrumentation-a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.三种不同几何形状的旋转锉系统在根管预备前后对感染根管抗菌效果的比较——一项双盲随机对照临床试验
BDJ Open. 2020 Jun 8;6:8. doi: 10.1038/s41405-020-0035-7. eCollection 2020.
9
Disinfecting Effects of Rotary Instrumentation with Either 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite or 2% Chlorhexidine as the Main Irrigant: A Randomized Clinical Study.以2.5%次氯酸钠或2%氯己定为主要冲洗液的旋转器械消毒效果:一项随机临床研究
J Endod. 2016 Jun;42(6):943-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
10
Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial.单次就诊与两次就诊根管治疗根尖周炎患牙的成功率:一项随机对照试验。
J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Shaping Efficiency of Rotary and Reciprocating Kinematics of Engine-driven Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Moderate and Severely curved Root Canals Using Microcomputed Tomography: A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo Studies.使用微计算机断层扫描评估机用镍钛器械在中度和重度弯曲根管中旋转和往复运动的效率:体外研究的系统评价。
J Endod. 2024 Jul;50(7):907-924. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
2
Principle and antimicrobial efficacy of laser-activated irrigation: A narrative review.激光激活冲洗的原理和抗菌效果:综述。
Int Endod J. 2024 Jul;57(7):841-860. doi: 10.1111/iej.14042. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
3
Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in Retreatment of Bioactive and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers.往复式器械在再治疗生物活性和树脂类根管封闭剂中的疗效。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022 Dec;56(4):338-350. doi: 10.15644/asc56/4/1.
4
Efficiency Evaluation of Various Solvents in Retreatment of Endodontic Filling in Extracted Teeth.不同溶剂对拔除牙根管充填物再处理的效率评估
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022 Mar;56(1):2-11. doi: 10.15644/asc56/1/1.
5
Present status and future directions - irrigants and irrigation methods.现状与未来方向——冲洗剂和冲洗方法。
Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):588-612. doi: 10.1111/iej.13739. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
6
An Update on Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Endodontics: Mechanical Characteristics, Testing and Future Perspective-An Overview.镍钛旋转器械在牙髓病学中的最新进展:机械特性、测试及未来展望——综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;8(12):218. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8120218.
7
Effectiveness of 1-Visit and 2-Visit Endodontic Retreatment of Teeth with Persistent/Secondary Endodontic Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 18 Months of Follow-up.一次性和两次性根管再治疗术治疗持续性/继发性根管感染患牙的疗效:一项为期 18 个月随访的随机临床试验。
J Endod. 2022 Jan;48(1):4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
8
The impact of an enhanced infection control protocol on molar root canal treatment outcome - a randomized clinical trial.增强感染控制方案对磨牙根管治疗效果的影响——一项随机临床试验。
Int Endod J. 2021 Nov;54(11):1993-2005. doi: 10.1111/iej.13605. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
9
Critical analysis of the reporting quality of randomized trials within Endodontics using the Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) 2020 quality standard checklist.运用 2020 年《牙髓随机对照试验报告的首选条目清单》(PRIRATE)质量标准检查表,对牙髓学领域随机试验的报告质量进行批判性分析。
Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1083-1104. doi: 10.1111/iej.13489. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
10
Quantitative Assessment of the Efficacy of Two Different Single-file Systems in Reducing the Bacterial load in Oval-Shaped Canals: A Clinical Study.两种不同单器械系统减少卵圆形根管内细菌负荷效果的定量评估:一项临床研究。
J Endod. 2020 Sep;46(9):1228-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

旋转和往复式器械操作技术的抗菌效果

Antibacterial Efficacy of Rotary and Reciprocating Instrumentation Techniques.

作者信息

Sesar Anja, Budimir Ana, Anić Ivica, Kapetanović Petričević Gabrijela, Bago Ivona

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Oral Pathology and Periodontology, Dental Polyclinic Zagreb, Croatia.

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Infection Prevention and Control, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Sep;58(3):245-254. doi: 10.15644/asc58/3/5.

DOI:10.15644/asc58/3/5
PMID:39492863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526829/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To clinically evaluate the effectiveness of rotary (ProTaper Next [PTN]) and reciprocating (Wave One Gold [WOG]) instrumentation techniques in eliminating bacteria from the root canals of teeth with apical periodontitis during a single-visit root canal treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients were randomly assigned to the WOG or PTN instrumentation techniques groups. A single-visit root canal treatment was performed on all the patients. In both groups, root canals were irrigated with 10 ml of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and the final irrigation protocol was applied. Microbiological samples from the root canal were collected initially (Sample 1), after chemo-mechanical instrumentation (Sample 2), and after the final irrigation protocol (Sample 3). Quantification of bacteria at each stage of root canal treatment was performed using the culture method (colony-forming units [CFUs]), and bacterial species were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

There were 55 aerobic and anaerobic bacterial species identified. Chemo-mechanical root canal treatment with both instrumentation techniques and the final irrigation protocol significantly reduced the number of CFUs (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in antibacterial efficacy between WOG and PTN groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although both root canal instrumentation techniques were highly effective in removing bacteria from the necrotic canals of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis, no complete eradication of bacteria was found in any sample.

摘要

目的

临床评估旋转(ProTaper Next [PTN])和往复(Wave One Gold [WOG])器械预备技术在单次就诊根管治疗中从患有根尖周炎的牙齿根管中清除细菌的有效性。

材料与方法

40例患者被随机分配至WOG或PTN器械预备技术组。对所有患者进行单次就诊根管治疗。两组均用10 ml次氯酸钠(NaOCl)冲洗根管并应用最终冲洗方案。在根管治疗的初始阶段(样本1)、化学机械预备后(样本2)以及最终冲洗方案后(样本3)收集根管微生物样本。使用培养法(菌落形成单位[CFU])对根管治疗各阶段的细菌进行定量,并使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法鉴定细菌种类。

结果

共鉴定出55种需氧和厌氧细菌。两种器械预备技术联合最终冲洗方案进行化学机械根管治疗均显著减少了CFU数量(p<0.001)。WOG组和PTN组之间的抗菌效果无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

尽管两种根管器械预备技术在从患有慢性根尖周炎的牙齿坏死根管中清除细菌方面都非常有效,但在任何样本中均未发现细菌被完全根除。