Suppr超能文献

旋转和往复式器械操作技术的抗菌效果

Antibacterial Efficacy of Rotary and Reciprocating Instrumentation Techniques.

作者信息

Sesar Anja, Budimir Ana, Anić Ivica, Kapetanović Petričević Gabrijela, Bago Ivona

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Oral Pathology and Periodontology, Dental Polyclinic Zagreb, Croatia.

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Infection Prevention and Control, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Sep;58(3):245-254. doi: 10.15644/asc58/3/5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To clinically evaluate the effectiveness of rotary (ProTaper Next [PTN]) and reciprocating (Wave One Gold [WOG]) instrumentation techniques in eliminating bacteria from the root canals of teeth with apical periodontitis during a single-visit root canal treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients were randomly assigned to the WOG or PTN instrumentation techniques groups. A single-visit root canal treatment was performed on all the patients. In both groups, root canals were irrigated with 10 ml of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and the final irrigation protocol was applied. Microbiological samples from the root canal were collected initially (Sample 1), after chemo-mechanical instrumentation (Sample 2), and after the final irrigation protocol (Sample 3). Quantification of bacteria at each stage of root canal treatment was performed using the culture method (colony-forming units [CFUs]), and bacterial species were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

There were 55 aerobic and anaerobic bacterial species identified. Chemo-mechanical root canal treatment with both instrumentation techniques and the final irrigation protocol significantly reduced the number of CFUs (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in antibacterial efficacy between WOG and PTN groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although both root canal instrumentation techniques were highly effective in removing bacteria from the necrotic canals of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis, no complete eradication of bacteria was found in any sample.

摘要

目的

临床评估旋转(ProTaper Next [PTN])和往复(Wave One Gold [WOG])器械预备技术在单次就诊根管治疗中从患有根尖周炎的牙齿根管中清除细菌的有效性。

材料与方法

40例患者被随机分配至WOG或PTN器械预备技术组。对所有患者进行单次就诊根管治疗。两组均用10 ml次氯酸钠(NaOCl)冲洗根管并应用最终冲洗方案。在根管治疗的初始阶段(样本1)、化学机械预备后(样本2)以及最终冲洗方案后(样本3)收集根管微生物样本。使用培养法(菌落形成单位[CFU])对根管治疗各阶段的细菌进行定量,并使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法鉴定细菌种类。

结果

共鉴定出55种需氧和厌氧细菌。两种器械预备技术联合最终冲洗方案进行化学机械根管治疗均显著减少了CFU数量(p<0.001)。WOG组和PTN组之间的抗菌效果无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

尽管两种根管器械预备技术在从患有慢性根尖周炎的牙齿坏死根管中清除细菌方面都非常有效,但在任何样本中均未发现细菌被完全根除。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Present status and future directions - irrigants and irrigation methods.现状与未来方向——冲洗剂和冲洗方法。
Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):588-612. doi: 10.1111/iej.13739. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验