Wirth Steffen, Best Christofer, Spaeth Johannes, Guttmann Josef, Schumann Stefan
Division of Experimental Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Hugstetter Straße 55, Freiburg, Germany.
Division of Experimental Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Hugstetter Straße 55, Freiburg, Germany.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2014 Oct 1;202:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
Recently, we presented Flow Controlled Expiration (FLEX) as a new option for lung-protective ventilation. FLEX delays the expiratory volume decrease in the lungs without prolonging the duration of expiration. Most ventilated patients nowadays receive spontaneous breathing support. We investigated whether FLEX is tolerated by awake subjects. In 24 healthy subjects restrictive lung disease was simulated by bandaging the thorax. The subjects were asked to indicate the perceived discomfort of breathing at various levels of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP=0, 3, 6 or 9 cmH2O) with and without FLEX. Breathing discomfort was not affected by FLEX (p=0.269), but higher PEEP increased breathing discomfort (p<0.001). Only in forced choice comparison a stronger FLEX condition was perceived as less comfortable (p<0.01) than a weaker one. We conclude that FLEX decreases the breathing comfort in healthy subjects to a lesser extent than PEEP. Therefore, FLEX might be used to support ventilation therapy in spontaneously breathing patients.
最近,我们提出了流量控制呼气(FLEX)作为肺保护性通气的一种新选择。FLEX可延缓肺内呼气容积的减少,而不会延长呼气时间。如今,大多数接受通气治疗的患者都接受自主呼吸支持。我们研究了清醒受试者是否能耐受FLEX。在24名健康受试者中,通过包扎胸部模拟限制性肺病。要求受试者指出在不同水平的呼气末正压(PEEP = 0、3、6或9 cmH₂O)下,有和没有FLEX时呼吸的不适感。FLEX对呼吸不适感没有影响(p = 0.269),但较高的PEEP会增加呼吸不适感(p < 0.001)。仅在强制选择比较中,较强的FLEX条件被认为比较弱的条件更不舒服(p < 0.01)。我们得出结论,FLEX对健康受试者呼吸舒适度的降低程度小于PEEP。因此,FLEX可用于支持自主呼吸患者的通气治疗。